The ICTY and the Right to a Fair Trial: A Critique of the Critics

Leiden Journal of International Law

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 215-221

  Swaak Goldman, Olivia Q ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

fair trial; International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920557373     PISSN: 09221565     EISSN: 14789698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0922156597000198     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. G. Robertson, War Crimes Deserve a Fair Trial, The Times, 26 June 1996, at 20.
2. C. Thornberry, Saving the War Crimes Tribunal, 104 Foreign Policy 72, 84 (Fall 1996).
3. W.E. Burger, The Doctrine ofJudicial Review: Mr. Marshall, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Mar bury, in M.W. Cannon & D.M. O'Brien (Eds.), Views from the Bench 14 (1985); cited in L. Fisher, American Constitutional Law 52 (1995).
4. R.J. Goldstone, It's Not Too Late for Action Against War Crime, International Herald Tribune, 5 March 1997.
5. Id.
6. The President's Second Report to the United Nations General Assembly, 7 Nov. 1995, reproduced in 1995 Yearbook of the ICTY 311 (1996).
7. Prosecutor v. Tadic, Decision on the Prosecutor's Motion for Protective Measures for Viaims and Witnesses, Case No. IT-94-1-T, T. Ch. II, 10 Aug. 1995 (Victims and Witnesses Decision).
8. M. Leigh, The Use of Unnamed Witnesses Against Accused, 90 AJIL 235 (1996).
9. Victims and Witnesses Decision, The Use of Unnamed Witnesses Against Accused note 7, at para. 26.
10. Id., at para. 27. See also Prosecutor v. Landzo, Delic, Delalic and Mucic, Decision on Dela-lic's Motion for Provisional Release, Case No. IT-96-21, T. Ch. II, 25 Sept. 1996.
11. C. Chinkin, Due Process and Witness Anonymity, 91 AJIL 75, at 76 (1997).
12. P. Inventius Celsius, +140.
13. Prosecutor v. Blaskic, Decision of Trial Chamber I on the Protection of Witnesses and Start of the Trial, Case No. IT-95-14-T, T. Ch. I, 2 Oct. 1996.
14. Prosecutor v. Tadic, Decision on Prosecutor's Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Witness R, at 5, Case No. IT-94-1-T, T. Ch. n, 31 July 1996.
15. Featherstone, Decision on Prosecutor's Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Witness R note 8, at 186.
16. Prosecutor v. Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motions to Summon and Protect Defence Witnesses, and On the Giving of Evidence by Video-link, Case No. IT-94-T-1, T. Ch. II, 25 June 1996. See Featherstone, Featherstone note 8 at 191-194.
17. Victims and Witnesses Decision, Decision on the Defence Motions to Summon and Protect Defence Witnesses note 7, at paras. 70-71.
18. See M. Rees & S. Maguire, Rape as a Crime Against Humanity Tribunal, Nov./Dec. 1996, at 8; see also Chinkin, Victims and Witnesses Decision note 13.