Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 27-35

  Scheuner, Maren T ^a,b   Peredo, Jane ^a   Benkendorf, Judith ^c   Bowdish, Bruce ^c   Feldman, Gerald ^d   Fleisher, Lynn ^e   Mulvihill, John J ^f   Watson, Michael ^c   Herman, Gail E ^g   Evans, James ^h  

^a VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c American College of Medical Genetics   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

incidental findings; informed consent; next generation sequencing; return of results; secondary findings

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMERICAN COLLEGE OF MEDICAL GENETICS AND GENOMICS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL GENETICS; CYTOGENETICS; EXPERIENCE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENOME SCALE SEQUENCING; GENOMICS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; PROCEDURES;

DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GENOMICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; INTERNET; MALE;

EID: 84920545337     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.165     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013;15:258-267.
2. Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2418-2425.
3. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Board of Directors. Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing. Genet Med 2012;14:759-761.
4. Shameer K, Klee EW, Dalenberg AK, Kullo IJ. Whole exome sequencing implicates an INO80D mutation in a syndrome of aortic hypoplasia, premature atherosclerosis, and arterial stiffness. Circ Cardiovasc Genet e-pub ahead of print 13 August 2014.
5. Chen PC, Yin J, Yu HW, et al. Next-generation sequencing identifies rare variants associated with Noonan syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111: 11473-11478.
6. Gee HY, Ashraf S, Wan X, et al. Mutations in EMP2 cause childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2014;94:884-890.
7. Kuhlenbaümer G, Hullmann J, Appenzeller S. Novel genomic techniques open new avenues in the analysis of monogenic disorders. Hum Mutat 2011;32: 144-151.
8. Grove ME, Wolpert MN, Cho MK, Lee SS, Ormond KE. Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results. J Genet Couns 2014;23 :531-538.
9. Strong KA, Zusevics KL, Bick D, Veith R. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings. Clin Genet 2014;86:461-468.
10. Yu JH, Harrell TM, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and wholegenome sequencing. Am J Hum Genet 2014;95:77-84.
11. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (PCSBI). Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts. Washington, DC, 2013:27.
12. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al.; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15:565-574.
13. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn, Oxford University Press: New York, 2008.
14. National Human Genome Research Institute. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER). http://www.genome.gov/CSER. Accessed 15 August 2014.
15. Battista RN, Blancquaert I, Laberge AM, van Schendel N, Leduc N. Genetics in health care: an overview of current and emerging models. Public Health Genomics 2012;15:34-45.
16. National Bioethical Advisory Commission. Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, summary. Bethesda, MD, 2001. ISBN 1-931022-18-6.
17. Lohn Z, Adam S, Birch P, Townsend A, Friedman J. Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161A:542-549.
18. Lemke AA, Bick D, Dimmock D, Simpson P, Veith R. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study. Clin Genet 2013;84:230-236.
19. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG News. ACMG Updates Recommendation on "Opt Out" for Genome Sequencing Return of Results. https://www.acmg.net/docs/Release-ACMGUpdatesRecommendations-final.pdf. Accessed 15 August 2014.