Reconsidering prior knowledge

Thinking with Data

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 319-344

  Schwartz, Daniel L ^a   Sears, David ^a   Chang, Jammie ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920443695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810057     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). What features make samples seem representative? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 515–550.
2. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, (vol. 24; pp. 61–100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning(pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
5. CTGV [Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt]. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
7. Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
8. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment. Psychological Review, 62, 32–51.
9. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1983). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of the fraction concept. Cognitive Science, 29, 587–625.
11. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Minstrell, J. A. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research(pp. 129–149). Alexandria, VA: ASCD
13. Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339–363.
14. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. (L. Leake, Jr., P. Burrell, & H. D. Fischbein, Trans.). NY: Norton.
15. Plato (1961). Collected dialogs of Plato including the letters. (E. Hamilton & H. Cairns, Eds.) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998) A Time for telling. Cognition & Instruction, 16, 475–522.
17. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. A. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective(pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
18. Schwartz, D. L., Goldman, S. R., Vye N. J., Barron, B. J., & CTGV. (1998). Aligning everyday and mathematical reasoning: The case of sampling assumptions. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Agendas for learning, teaching and assessment in K–12(pp. 233–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for learning: The hidden efficiency of original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 22, 129–184.
20. Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Nasir, N. (2005). Designs for knowledge evolution: Towards a prescriptive theory for integrating first- and second-hand knowledge. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education, and communication technology(pp. 21–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Pfaffman, J. (2005). How mathematics propels the development of physical knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 65–88.
22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds.). NY: Plenum.