Use of popular and literary criticism in providing subject access to imaginative literature

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 71-97

  Hayes, Susan M ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Access point; Connotative; Denotative; Fiction; Literary criticism; Subject access; Subject analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920437277     PISSN: 01639374     EISSN: 15444554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v32n04_05     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Library Association. Resources and Technical Services Division. Cataloging and Classification Section. Subject Analysis Committee. Subcommittee on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, etc. 1990. Guidelines On Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, etc. Chicago: American Library Association.
2. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. Cataloging and Classification Section. Subject Analysis Committee. Subcommittee on the Revision of the Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, etc. 2000. 2nd edition. Guidelines On Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, etc. Chicago: American Library Association.
3. Beardsley, Monroe. 1958. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
4. Beghtol, Clare. 1994. The Classification of Fiction: The Development of a System Based on Theoretical Principles. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1994.
5. Bookstein, Abraham. 1983. “Sampling From Card Files.” Library Quarterly 53, no. 3:307-312.
6. Bookstein, Abraham. 1985. “Probability and Fuzzy-set Applications to Information Retrieval.” In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), v. 20, p. 117-151. Edited by M.E. Williams. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
7. Bradley, Jana. 1993. “Methodological Issues and Practices in Qualitative Research.” Library Quarterly 63, no. 4:431-449.
8. Columbia University Press. 1975. The New Columbia Encyclopedia. 4th ed. Edited by William H. Harris and Judith S. Levey. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Culler, J. 1985. “Introduction: The Identity of the Literary Text.” In Identity of the Literary Text, p. 3-15. Edited by M.J. Valdes and O.J. Miller. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
10. DeZelar-Tiedman, Christine. 1996. “Subject Access to Fiction: An Application of the Guidelines.” Library Resources & Technical Services 40 (3):203-210.
11. Down, Nancy. 1995. “Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction: Participating in the OCLC/LC Fiction Project.” Cataloging&Classification Quarterly 20(2):61-69.
12. El-Hoshy, Lynn. 2001. Library of Congress Report On Subject Cataloging. ALA ALCTS CCS Subject Analysis Committee (SAC). Annual Meeting, June 17, 2001.
13. Frank, Frederick S. 1986. “Proto-Gothicism: The Infernal Iconography of Walpole’s Castle of Otranto.” Orbis Litterarum 41 (3):199-212.
14. Hooper, R.S. 1965. Indexer Consistency Tests–Origin, Measurements, Results and Utilization. Bethesda, MD: IBM Corp.
15. Johnson, Barbara. 1981. The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Library of Congress. Cataloging Policy & Support Office. 2001. Library of Congress Subject Headings. 24th edition. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress.
17. Library of Congress. Cataloging Policy & Support Office. August 2000. “Literature: Fiction H 1790.” Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. 5th ed. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress, pp. 5-7.
18. Leonard, Lawrence. 1977. “Inter-Indexer Consistency Studies, 1954-1975: a Review of the Literature and Summary of Study Results.” University of Illinois Graduate School of Library Science Occasional Papers no. 131. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
19. MacEwan, Andrew. 1997. “Promoting Fiction Through the Catalogue.” Librarian’s World 6(2):22-24.
20. Markey, Karen. 1984. “Interindexer Consistency Tests: a Literature Review and Report of a Test of Consistency in Indexing Visual Materials.” Library and Information Science Research 6, no. 2: 155-77.
21. Maron, M.E. 1993. “On Indexing, Retrieval and the Meaning of About.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28, no. 1 (January): 38-43.
22. Martinez, Bonati Felix. 1985. “The Stability of Literary Meaning.” In Identity of the Literary Text, p. 232-245. Edited by M.J. Valdes and O.J. Miller. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
23. McGrath, J.E., J.M. Martin and R.A. Kulka. 1982. Some Quasi-rules for Making Judgment Calls in Research. Edited by J.E. McGrath, J.M. Martin and R.A. Kulka. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Olderr, Stephen. 1991. Olderr’s Fiction Subject Headings: A Supplement and Guide to the LC Thesaurus. Chicago: American Library Association, 1991.
25. Ransley, Ambrose. 1987. “Towards a Fiction Index: Part One,” The Australian Library Journal 36, no. 1 (Feb.): 44-54, and “Towards a Fiction Index: Part Two.” The Australian Library Journal 36, no. 2 (May): 102-113.
26. Ranta, Judith A. 1991. “The New Literary Scholarship and a Basis for Increased Subject Catalog Access to Imaginative Literature.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 14, no. 1 (1991): 3-27.
27. Smiraglia, Richard. 1991. “Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: Proposal for a Doctoral Dissertation.” Graduate Library School, University of Chicago.
28. Svenonius, Elaine. 1988. “An Ideal Classification for an On-line Catalog.” In Classification Theory in the Computer Age: Conversations Across the Disciplines, p. 35-43. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18-19, 1988, Albany, NY: The School of Information Science and Policy and the Professional Development Program of Rockefeller College, Univ. at Albany, State Univ. of New York.
29. Tonta, Yasar. 1991. “A Study of Indexing Consistency between Library of Congress and British Library Catalogers.” Library Resources & Technical Services 35, no. 2: 177-185.
30. Wellek, Rene. 1978. “What Is Literature?” In What Is Literature? Edited by Paul Hernadi. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31. Yu, Liangzhi and Ann O’Brien. 1997. “Constructing REFERENCES from the Book to the Reader in Fiction Searching: An Experiment on the Construction of Information Cues from the Reading Context Approach.” Information Services and Use 17 (1997): 187-199.