Designing a data analysis tool for learners

Thinking with Data

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 267-291

  Konold, Clifford ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920430631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810057     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bakker, A. (2002). Route-type and landscape-type software for learning statistical data analysis. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching of Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
2. Bakker, A., Biehler, R., & Konold, C. (2005). Should young students learn about boxplots? In G. Burrill & M. Camden (Eds.), Curricular development in statistics education: International Association for Statistical Education 2004 Roundtable (pp. 163–173). Voorburg, the Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
3. Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 147–168) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Biehler, R. (1997). Software for learning and for doing statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 167–189.
5. Biehler, R. (1998). Students—statistical software—statistical tasks: A study of problems at the interfaces. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 1025–1031). Singapore: International Statistical Institute.
6. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.
7. Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1–78.
8. Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104, 301–318.
9. Flowers, J. H., & Hauer, T. A. (1992). The ear’s versus the eye’s potential to assess characteristics of numeric data: Are we too visuocentric? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24(2), 258–264.
10. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Harradine, A., & Konold, C. (2006). How representational medium affects the data displays students make. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics(ICOTS) [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
12. Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.
13. Konold, C. (2002). Teaching concepts rather than conventions. New England Journal of Mathematics, 34(2), 69–81.
14. Konold, C. (1995). Datenanalyse mit einfachen, didaktisch gestalteten Softwarewerkzeugen für Schülerinnen und Schüler [Designing data analysis tools for students]. Computer und Unterricht, 17, 42–49.
15. Konold, C., & Higgins, T. L. (2003). Reasoning about data. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 193–215). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
16. Konold, C., & Miller, C. (1994). DataScope. Santa Barbara: Intellimation Library for the Macintosh.
17. Konold, C., & Miller, C., D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
18. Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students’ reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 392–414.
19. Konold, C., Robinson, A., Khalil, K., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Wing, R., et al. (2002). Students' use of modal clumps to summarize data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching of Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
21. Noss, R., Pozzi, S. & Hoyles, C. (1999). Touching epistemologies: Meanings of average and variation in nursing practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 25–51.
22. Pollatsek, A., Konold, C., Well, A. D., & Lima, S. D. (1984). Beliefs underlying random sampling. Memory & Cognition, 12, 395–401.
23. Rubin, A., Hammerman, J., Campbell, C., & Puttick, G. (2005). The effect of distributional shape on group comparison strategies. In K. Makar (Ed.), Reasoning about distribution: A collection of current research studies. Proceedings of the Fourth International Research Forum on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy (SRTL-4). Brisbane: University of Queensland.
24. Thamel, P. (2003). Baseball; Red Sox’ Checklist: Manager (Yes), Rodriguez (Maybe). The New York Times, December 5, 2003. Sec. D, p. 3.
25. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
26. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Boyce, S. J. (1990). Understanding the effects of sample size on the variability of the mean. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 289–312.