Investigating event-related oscillations in infancy

Infant EEG and Event-Related Potentials

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 289-304

  Csibra, Gergely ^a   Johnson, Mark H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920371089     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203759660     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (2002). Developments in young infant's reasoning about occluded objects. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 267 336.
2. Baillargeon, R. (1994). Physical reasoning in young infants: Seeking explanations for impossible events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 9-33.
3. Baillargeon, R. (2001). Infants’ physical knowledge: Of acquired expectations and core principles, ln E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development (pp. 341-361). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
4. Bertenthal, B. I., Campos, J. J., & Haith, M. M. (1980). Development of visual organization: The perception of subjective contours. Child Development, 51,1072-1080.
5. Csibra, G. (2001). Illusory contour figures are perceived as occluding surfaces by 8-month-old infants. Developmental Science. 4. F7-F11.
6. Csibra, G., Davis, G., Spralling, M. W., & Johnson, M. H. (2000). Gamma oscillations and object processing in the infant brain. Science, 290, 1582-1585.
7. Csibra, G., Tucker, L. A., & Johnson, M. H. (1998). Neural correlates of saccade planning in infants: A high-density ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 201-215.
8. Csibra, G., Tucker, L. A., & Johnson, M. H. (2001). Differential frontal cortex activation before anticipatory and reactive saccades in infants. Infancy. 2, 159-174.
9. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces in preattentive human vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 24, 169-184.
10. Elliott, M. A., & Müller, J. (2000). Evidence for 40-Hz oscillatory short-term visual memory revealed by human reaction-time measurements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26, 703-718.
11. Ghim, H.-R. (1990). Evidence for perceptual organization in infants: Perception of subjective contours ill young infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 13, 221-248.
12. Graziano, M. S. A., Hu, X. U., & Gross, C. G. (1997). Coding the locations of objects in the dark. Science, 277, 239 241.
13. Grice, S. J., de Haan, M., Halit, H., Johnson, M. H., Csibra, G., & KarmilolT-Smith, A. (2003). ERP abnormalities of visual perception in Williams syndrome. Neuro Report, 14, 1773-1777.
14. Herrmann, C. S., & Mecklingcr, A. (2000). Magnetocncephalographic responses to illusory figures: Early evoked gamma is affectcd by processing of stimulus features. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 38, 265-281.
15. Herrmann, C. S., Mecklinger, A., & Pfeifer, W. (1999). Gamma responses and ERPs in a visual classification task. Clinical Neurophysiology. 111, 636-642.
16. Johnson, M. H., Tucker, L., Stiles, J., & Trauner, D. (1998). Visual attention in infants with perinatal brain damage: Evidence of the importance of anterior lesions. Developmental Science, I, 53-58.
17. Kanizsa, G. (1976). Subjective contours. Scientific American, 234, 48, 52.
18. Kaufman, J., Csibra, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2003). Representing occluded objects in the human infant brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biology Letters, 270/S2, 140-143.
19. Kaufman, J., Csibra, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2005). Oscillatory activity in the infant brain reflects object maintenance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 15271-15274.
20. Kavsek, M. J. (2002). The perception of static subjective contours in infancy. Child Development, 73, 331-344.
21. Kavsek, M. (2004). The influence of contcxt on amodal completion in 5- and 7-month-old infants. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5,159-184.
22. Kellman, P. J., & Banks, M. S. (1998). Infant visual perception. In W. Damon. D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child development (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 103-146). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Lachau, J.-P, Lutz, A., Rudrauf, D., Cosmelli, D., Le Van Quycn, M., Martinerie, J. et al. (2002). Estimating the timc-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: An introduction to wavelet coherence. Neurophysiologie CliniquelClinical Neurophysiology, 32, 157-174.
24. Lachau, J.-P, Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping. 8,194-208.
25. Llinás, R. R. (1988). The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: Insights into central nervous system function. Science. 242, 1654, 1664.
26. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Ocltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
27. Múller, M. M., Bosch, J., Elbert, T., Kreiter, A., Sosa, M. V., Sosa, P. V. et al. (1996). Visually induced gamma-band responses in human electroencephalographic activity—a link to animal studies. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 96-102.
28. Munakata, Y. (2001). Graded representations in behavioral dissociations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 309-315.
29. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
30. Rainer, G., & Miller, E. K. (2000). Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 27, 179-189.
31. Reid, V. M., Csibra, G., Belsky, J., & Johnson, M. H. (in press). Neural correlates of the perception of goal-directed actions in infants. Acta Psychologica.
32. Samar, V. J., Bopardikar, A., Rao, R., & Swartz, K. (1999). Wavelet analysis of neuroelectric waveform: A conceptual tutorial. Brain and Language, 66, 7-60.
33. Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Explaining the infant’s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18.555-586.
35. Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151, 162.
36. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, J., & Pcrnier, J. (1996). Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. Journal of Neuroscience, 16,4240-4249.
37. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., & Pernier, J. (1999). A ring-shaped distribution of dipoles as a source of induced gamma-band activity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110,660-665.
38. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Peronnet, F., & Pernier, J. (1998). Induced gammaband activity during the delay of a visual short-term memory task in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 18,4244-4254.
39. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14,107-141.
40. Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P, Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brain web: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 229-239.
41. von Hofsten, C., & Spelke, E. S. (1985). Object perception and object-directed reaching in infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114,198-212.
42. Wynn, K., & Chiang, W. C. (1998). Limits to infants’ object knowledge: The case of magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9.448-155.