Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1628-1639

  Li, Shuangcheng ^a   Wang, Jue ^a   Zhu, Wenbo ^a   Zhang, Jin ^a   Liu, Ya ^a   Gao, Yang ^a   Wang, Yang ^a   Li, Yan ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services geography; paradigm; Research; Spatial and regional perspective

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; HUMAN GEOGRAPHY; PARADIGM SHIFT; RESEARCH; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WELFARE PROVISION;

EID: 84920288863     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201411004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
2. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
3. Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 2002, 297: 950- 953.
4. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision-makers. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
5. Alcamo J, van Vuuren D, Ringler C et al. Changes in nature's balance sheet: model-based estimates of future worldwide ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2005, 10(2): 19.
6. Fu Bejie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China. Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 4(6): 571-576.
7. Li Wenhua, Zhang Biao, Xie Gaodi. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 1-10.
8. Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196
9. Li Shuangcheng, Liu Jinlong, Zhang Caiyu et al. The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1618-1630.
10. Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106(5): 1305-1312.
11. Haines-Young R, Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being//Raffaelli D, Frid C. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridge, 2010.
12. Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming G S et al. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social- ecological approach. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2013, 11(5): 268-273.
13. Steffen W. Interdisciplinary research for managing ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106(5): 1301-1302.
14. Syrbe R, Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 80-88.
15. Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A. Valuing ecosystem services Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2010, 1185: 54-78.
16. Potschin M, Haines-Young R H. Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective. Progress in Physical Geography, 2011, 35(5): 575-594.
17. Cai Yunlong. On geography in contemporary scientific and social perspectives. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2013, 35 (1): 30-39.
18. Liu Changming, Zheng Du, Lu Dadao et al. Development orientation for geographical sciences: Written speeches by editors in chief from geographical journals. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 531-545.
19. Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
20. Li Shuangcheng. The Research Paradigm of Physical Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
21. Tang Maolin. The diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(4): 865-882.
22. Ye Chao. The significant turns of thoughts on space in human geography. Human Geography, 2012, 27(5): 1-5.
23. Nemec K T, Raudsepp-Hearne C. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2013, 22: 1-15
24. Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(18): 1379-1390.
25. Li Shuangcheng, Ma Cheng, Wang Yang et al. The Geography of Ecosystem Services. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
26. Wallace K J. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139(3/4): 235-246.
27. Fisher B, Turner R K. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(5): 1167-1169.
28. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
29. Haines-Young R, Potschin M. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. 2010. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem/pdf/ UNCEEA-5-7-Bk1.pdf.
30. Zhang Biao, Xie Gaodi, Xiao Yu et al. Classificationof ecosystem services based on human demand. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 6(12): 64-67.
31. Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr. T D, Bennett E M et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28.
32. Maes J, Paracchini M L, Zulian G et al. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 2012, 155: 1-12.
33. McShane T O, Hirsch P D, Trung T C et al. Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 966-972
34. Syrbe Ralf-Uwe, Walz Ulrich. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 80-88.