Transcatheter aortic valve replacement program development: Recommendations for best practice

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 859-867

  Hawkey, Marian C ^a   Lauck, Sandra B ^b   Perpetua, Elizabeth M ^c   Fowler, Jill ^d   Schnell, Susan ^e   Speight, Martina ^f   Lisby, Karen Holst ^g   Webb, John G ^b   Leon, Martin B ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute   (United States)

^e MERIDIAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Aortic valve disease; Percutaneous intervention; Program development; Transcatheter valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HOSPITAL UTILIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPROCEDURAL CARE; POSTPROCEDURAL CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREPROCEDURAL CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; COOPERATION; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BENCHMARKING; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84920270689     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25529     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Nkomo V, Gardin J, Skelton T, Gottdiener J, Scott C, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: A populationbased study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-1011.
2. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal R, Pai R. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: Results from a cohort of 277 patients aged>or =80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:722-727.
3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597-1607.
4. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-2198.
5. Lauck S, Achtem L, Webb JG, et al. Implementation of processes of care to support transcatheter aortic valve replacement programs. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012;12:33-38.
6. Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1200-1254.
7. Webb J, Rodés-Cabau J, Fremes S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A canadian cardiovascular society position statement. Can J Cardiol 2012;28:520-528.
8. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:e1-e90.
9. Vahanian A, Otto CM. Risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 2010;31:416-423.
10. Bonow R, Carabello B, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): Developed in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists: Endorsed by the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions and the society of thoracic surgeons. American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines; society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists; society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions; society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 2006;114:e84-e231.
11. Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, Cohn LH, Koster JK, Collins JJ. Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation 1980;62:42-48.
12. Quere J-P, Monin J-L, Levy F, et al. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:1738- 1744.
13. Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, LaBounty TM, et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:416-429.
14. Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, et al. A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:441-455.
15. Dewey TM, Brown DL, Herbert MA, et al. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89:758-767.
16. Nombela-Franco L, Webb JG, de Jaegere PP, et al. Timing, predictive factors, and prognostic value of cerebrovascular events in a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation 2012;126:3041-3053.
17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of the patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
18. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695-699.
19. Green P, Woglom AE, Genereux P, et al. The impact of frailty status on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults with severe aortic stenosis: A single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:974-981.
20. Stortecky S, Schoenenberger AW, Moser A, et al. Evaluation of multidimensional geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:489-496.
21. Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin J-F, et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1668-1676.
22. Katz S, Branch LG, Branson MH, Papsidero JA, Beck JC, Greer DS. Active life expectancy. N Engl J Med 1983;309: 1218-1224.
23. Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: Selfmaintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179-186.
24. Ware JJ, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
25. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller M, et al. The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 1991;7:6-9.
26. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionanaire: A new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1245-1255.
27. Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure, part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire. Heart Failure 1987;3:198-209.
28. Tommaso CL, Bolman Iii RM, Feldman T, et al. Multisociety (AATS, ACCF, SCAI, and STS) expert consensus statement: Operator and institutional requirements for transcatheter valve repair and replacement, part 1: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2028-2042.
29. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Decision Memo for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR), Vol. CAG-00430N. USA; 2012.
30. Jilaihawi H, Chakravarty T, Weiss RE, Fontana GP, Forrester J, Makkar RR. Meta-analysis of complications in aortic valve replacement: Comparison of Medtronic-Corevalve, Edwards- Sapien and surgical aortic valve replacement in 8, 536 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:128-138.
31. Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: A consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:253-269.
32. Drolet A, De Juilio P, Harkless S, et al. Move to improve: The feasibility of using an early mobility protocol to increase ambulation in the intensive and intermediate care settings. Phys Ther 2013;93:197-207.
33. The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American geriatrics society updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:616-631.
34. Food and Drug Administration. Instructions for use: Edwards Sapien transcatheter heart valve with the Retroflex 3 delivery system. 2011, November. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/CirculatorySystemDevicesPanel/UCM262938.pdf. Accessed on February 1, 2013.
35. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The valve academic research consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;42:S45- S60.
36. Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M, et al.; FRANCE Registry Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Early results of the FRANCE (french aortic national corevalve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J 2011;32:191-197.
37. Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, et al.; German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: First results from a multi-centre realworld registry. Eur Heart J 2011;32:198-204.
38. Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology. STS/ACC transcatheter valve therapies registry. 2012. Available at: https://http://www.ncdr.com/TVT/Home/Default.aspx. Accessed on December 10, 2012.
39. Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T, et al. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic bioprosthesis european outcome (SOURCE) registry: A european registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 2010; 122:62-69.
40. Roselli EE, Abdel Azim A, Houghtaling PL, Jaber WA, Blackstone EH. Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse early and late outcomes after aortic valve replacement: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:1067-1074.
41. Cam A, Goel SS, Agarwal S, et al. Prognostic implications of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:800-808.
42. Toggweiler S, Boone RH, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2068- 2074.
43. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1686-1695.
44. Pilgrim T, Stortecky S, Luterbacher F, Windecker S, Wenaweser P. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and bleeding: Incidence, predictors and prognosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2012;35:1-7.
45. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Wang K, et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: Results from the PARTNER (placement of aortic transcatheter valve) trial (cohort A). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:548-558.
46. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: Results of the PARTNER (placement of aortic transcatheter valves) trial (cohort A). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;69: 2683-2692.
47. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Wang K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard care among inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis: Results from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort B). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;125:1102-1109.