The psychologist

Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 149-177

  Meloni, F ^a   Federici, S ^a,b   Stella, A ^c   Mazzeschi, C ^b   Cordella, B ^d   Greco, F ^d   Grasso, M ^d  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^c University for Foreigners   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920265314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. AAATE. (2003). AAATE Position Paper: A 2003 View on Technology and Disability. Retrieved from http://www.aaate.net/
2. American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
3. Badley, E. M. (2006, June 5-7). More than Facilitators and Barriers: Fitting the Full Range of Environmental and Personal Contextual Factors into the ICF Model. Paper presented at the 12th annual North American Collaborating Centre Conference on ICF, Vancouver, Canada.
4. Barker, D. J., Reid, D., and Cott, C. (2006). The experience of senior stroke survivors: Factors in community participation among wheelchair users. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(1), 18-25. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0002
5. Barry, P., and O'Leary, J. (1989). Roles of the psychologist on a traumatic brain injury rehabilitation team. Rehabilitation Psychology, 34(2), 83-90. doi:10.1037/h0091712
6. Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., and Üstün, T. B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48(9), 1173-1187. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00441-9
7. Bodenheimer, T., Lorig, K., Holman, H., and Grumbach, K. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(19), 2469-2475. doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469
8. Brown, M., and Gordon, W. A. (2004). Empowerment in measurement: "Muscle," "voice," and subjective quality of life as a gold standard. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(Suppl. 2), S13-S20. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.110
9. Carli, R. (1993). L'Analisi Della Domanda in Psicologia Clinica [Demand Analysis in Clinical Psychology]. Milan, Italy: Giuffré.
10. Cherry, K. (2010). What Is Abnormal Psychology? Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/
11. Cordella, B., Cardarelli, L., and Pizzi, E. (2001). L'identità professionale dello psicologo: Competenze specifiche/capacità di orientarsi [The professional identity of psychologist: Specific skills/ professional orientation abilities]. In M. Grasso (Ed.), Modelli e Contesti dell'Intervento Psicologico (p. 352). Rome: Kappa.
12. Cordella, B., Greco, F., and Grasso, M. (2011, May 17-20). Strategies of Development of a Vision Rehabilitation Service. Paper presented at the 16th International Association of Psychology and Psychiatry for Adults and Children Conference: APPAC '11, Athens, Greece.
13. Cruice, M. (2008). The contribution and impact of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health on quality of life in communication disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 38-49. doi:10.1080/17549500701790520
14. Duchan, J. F. (2004). Where is the person in the ICF? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6(1), 63-65. doi:10.1080/14417040410001669444
15. Farr, R. M., and Moscovici, S. (1984). Social Representations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Federici, S., and Meloni, F. (2010). WHODAS II: Disability self-evaluation in the ICF conceptual frame. In J. Stone, and M. Blouin (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation (pp. 1-22). Buffalo, NY: Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE). Retrieved from http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/299/
17. Federici, S., and Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2006). Un difficile accordo tra prevenzione e promozione. [Hard-won agreement between prevention and promotion]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 10(2), 330-334.
18. Finkelstein, V. (1998). Emancipating disability studies. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives (pp. 28-49). London: Cassell.
19. Finn, S. E. (2003). Therapeutic assessment of a man with "ADD." Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(2), 115-129. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_01
20. Finn, S. E., and Fischer, C. T. (1997, Aug 15-19). Therapeutic Psychological Assessment: Illustration and Analysis of Philosophical Assumptions. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
21. Fischer, C. T. (1982). Intimacy in assessment. In M. Fisher, and G. Stricker (Eds.), Intimacy (pp. 443-460). New York: Plenum.
22. Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Cote, J., and St-Michel, G. (1999). The Quebec Classification: Disability Creation Process. Québec, Canada: International Network on the Disability Creation Process.
23. Freda, M. F. (2009). Narrazione e Intervento in Psicologia Clinica. Costruire, Pensare e Trasformare Narrazioni tra Logos e Pathos [Narration and Intervention in Clinical Psychology. Building, Thinking and Transform Narratives Between Logos and Pathos]. Napoli, Italy: Liguori Editore.
24. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The Mind's Past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Geyh, S., Peter, C., Müller, R., Bickenbach, J. E., Kostanjsek, N., Üstün, B. T., et al. (2011). The personal factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the Literature-A systematic review and content analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(13-14), 1089-1102. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.523104
26. Girdler, S. J., Boldy, D. P., Dhaliwal, S. S., Crowley, M., and Packer, T. L. (2010). Vision self-management for older adults: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(2), 223. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.147538
27. Godshalk, A. N., Brown, G. C., Brown, H. C., and Brown, M. M. (2008). The power of hope: Being a doctor is more than relying solely on the numbers. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 92(6), 783-787. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.141663
28. Grasso, M. (2001). Modelli e Contesti dell'Intervento Psicologico [Models and Contexts of Psychological Intervention]. Rome: Kappa.
29. Grasso, M. (2010). La Relazione Terapeutica [The Therapeutic Relationship]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
30. Grasso, M., Cordella, B., and Pennella, A. R. (2003). L'Intervento in Psicologia Clinica: Fondamenti Teorici [Intervention in Clinical Psychology: Theoretical Foundations]. Roma, Italy: Carocci.
31. Grasso, M., and Salvatore, L. (1997). Pensiero e Decisionalità. Contributo alla Critica della Prospettiva Individualista in Psicologia [Thinking and Decision-Making. A Contribution to the Critique of the Individualist Perspective in Psychology] (Vol. 134). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
32. Greco, F. (in press). Resoconto Clinico di un Processo di Rieducazione in un CRPM di Parigi [Clinical Report of a Rehabilitation Process in a CPMR in Paris]. Rome: Nuova Cultura.
33. Gutenbrunner, C., Ward, A. B., and Chamberlain, M. A. (2007). White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in Europe (Revised November 2009). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(Suppl), 1-48. doi:10.2340/16501977-0028
34. Hayeems, R. Z., Geller, G., Finkelstein, D., and Faden, R. R. (2005). How patients experience progressive loss of visual function: A model of adjustment using qualitative methods. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89(5), 615-620. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.036046
35. Henderson, S., Skelton, H., and Rosenbaum, P. (2008). Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: Impact on child and caregiver ffunction. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50(2), 89-98. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.02021.x
36. Holman, H., and Lorig, K. (2000). Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. British Medical Journal, 320(7234), 526-527. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7234.526
37. Howe, T. J. (2008). The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1-2), 27-37. doi:10.1080/14417040701774824
38. Hunsley, J., and Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446-455. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
39. Jahiel, R. I., and Scherer, M. J. (2010). Initial steps towards a theory and praxis of personenvironment interaction in disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(17), 1467-1474. doi:10.3109/ 09638280802590637
40. Kandel, E. R. (2000). From nerve cells to cognition: The internal cellular representation required for perception and action. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of Neural Science (4th ed., pp. 381-403). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Kayes, N. M., and McPherson, K. M. (2010). Measuring what matters: Does 'objectivity' mean good science? Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(12), 1011-1019. doi:10.3109/09638281003775501
42. Khan, F., and Pallant, J. F. (2007). Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify preliminary comprehensive and brief core sets for multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(3), 205-213. doi:10.1080/09638280600756141
43. Lancia, F. (2004). Strumenti per l'Analisi dei Testi. Introduzione all'Uso di T-LAB [Tools for the Analysis of Texts. An Introduction to the Use of T-LAB]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
44. Lehman, C. A. (2003). Idiopathic intracranial hypertension within the ICF model: A review of the literature. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(5), 263-269. doi:10.1097/01376517-200310000-00004
45. Lenker, J. A., and Paquet, V. L. (2004). A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 16(1), 1-10. doi:10.1080/10400435.2004.10132069
46. Matte Blanco, I. (1975). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets: An Essay in Bi-logic. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
47. McInerney, R. G., and Walker, M. M. (2002). Toward a method of neurophenomenological assessment and intervention. Humanistic Psychologist, 30(3), 180-193. doi:10.1080/08873267.2002.9977034
48. Meloni, F., Federici, S., and Stella, A. (2011). The Psychologist's Role: A Neglected Presence in the Assistive Technology Assessment Process. In G. J. Gelderblom, M. Soede, L. Adriaens & K. Miesenberger (Eds.), Everyday Technology for Independence and Care: AAATE 2011 (Vol. 29, pp. 1199-1206). Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-814-4-1199
49. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128-165. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128
50. Mitani, S., Fujisawa, S., Mima, A., Shiota, H., Yanashima, K., Takahara, M., et al. (2007). The importance of measuring medical and psychological characteristics in visibility measurement of persons with low visual capability. In G. Eizmendi, J. M. Azkoitia, and G. Craddock (Eds.), Challenges for Assistive Technology: AAATE 07 (pp. 331-335). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
51. Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son Image et Son Public [Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
52. Nair, K. P. S. (2003). Life goals: The concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(2), 192-202. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr599oa
53. Neisser, U. (1989). Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54. Nihei, M., Inoue, T., Kaneshige, Y., and Fujie, M. G. (2007). Proposition of a new mobility aid for older persons: Reducing psychological conflict associated with the use of assistive technologies. In G. Eizmendi, J. M. Azkoitia, and G. Craddock (Eds.), Challenges for Assistive Technology: AAATE 07 (pp. 80-84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
55. Olkin, R. (1999). The personal, professional and political when clients have disabilities. Women and Therapy, 22(2), 87-103. doi:10.1300/J015v22n02_07
56. Pape, T. L.-B., Kim, J., and Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal ffactors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 5-20. doi:10.1080/09638280110066235
57. Pfeiffer, D. (1998). The ICIDH and the need for its revision. Disability and Society, 13(4), 503-523.
58. Philips, B., and Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36-45. doi:10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205
59. Plante, T. G. (2005). Contemporary Clinical Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
60. Poston, J. M., and Hanson, W. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 203-212. doi:10.1037/A001s679
61. Ricœur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian Press.
62. Riemer-Reiss, M. L., and Wacker, R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.
63. Roulstone, A. (1998). Researching a disabling society: The case of employment and new technology. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives (pp. 110-128). London: Cassell.
64. Scherer, M. J. (1998). Matching Person & Technology. A Series of Assessments for Evaluating Predispositions to and Outcomes of Technology Use in Rehabilitation, Education, the Workplace & Other Settings. Webster, NY: The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc.
65. Scherer, M. J. (2000). Living in the State of Stuck: How Technologies Affect the Lives of People with Disabilities (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
66. Scherer, M. J. (Ed.). (2002). Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67. Scherer, M. J. (2005). Cross-Walking the ICF to a Measure of Assistive Technology Predisposition and Use. Paper presented at the 11th Annual North American Collaborating Center (NACC) Conference on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), Rochester, NY.
68. Scherer, M. J., Blair, K. L., Banks, M. E., Brucker, B., Corrigan, J., and Wegener, S. (2004). Rehabilitation psychology. In W. E. Craighead and C. B. Nemeroff (Eds.), The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science (3rd ed., pp. 801-802). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
69. Scherer, M. J., Craddock, G., and MacKeogh, T. (2011). The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(10), 811-817. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511418
70. Scherer, M. J., and Cushman, L. A. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 387-393. doi:10.1080/09638280010006665
71. Scherer, M. J., Cushman, L. A., and Federici, S. (2004, Jun 2). Measuring Participation and the Disability Experience with the "Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment." Paper presented at the American Collaborating Center (NACC) Conference on ICF: Advancing a Research Agenda for ICF. Retrieved from http://www.icfconference.com/downloads/Marcia_Scherer.pdf.
72. Scherer, M. J., and Dicowden, M. A. (2008). Organizing future research and intervention efforts on the impact and effects of gender differences on disability and rehabilitation: The usefulness of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(3), 161-165. doi:10.1080/09638280701532292
73. Scherer, M. J., Sax, C. L., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L. A., and Scherer, J. V. (2005). Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(21), 1321-1331. doi:10.1080/09638280500164800
74. Sen, A. (2002). Health: Perception versus observation. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 324(7342), 860-861. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7342.860
75. Söderström, S., and Ytterhus, B. (2010). The use and non-use of assistive technologies from the world of information and communication technology by visually impaired young people: A walk on the tightrope of peer inclusion. Disability and Society, 25(3), 303-315. doi:10.1080/09687591003701215
76. Steiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., and Stucki, G. (2002). Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy, 82(11), 1098-1107.
77. Stephens, D., and Kerr, P. (2000). Auditory disablements: An update. Audiology, 39(6), 322-332. doi:10.3109/00206090009098013
78. Telfener, U. (2011). Apprendere I Contesti. Strategie Per Inserirsi in Nuovi Ambiti Di Lavoro [Learning the Contexts. Strategies to Fit into New Contexts of Work]. Milan, Italy: Raffaello Cortina.
79. Tharinger, D. J., Finn, S. E., Gentry, L., Hamilton, A., Flower, J., Matson, M., et al. (2009). Therapeutic assessment with children: A pilot study of treatment acceptability and outcome. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(3), 238-244. doi:10.1080/00223890902794275
80. Threats, T. T. (2003). The conceptual framework of ASHA's new scope of practice for speech-language pathology. Speech Pathology Online. Retrieved from http://www.speechpathology.com
81. Threats, T. T. (2007). Access for persons with neurogenic communication disorders: Influences of personal and environmental factors of the ICF. Aphasiology, 21(1), 67-80. doi:10.1080/ 02687030600798303
82. Ueda, S., and Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11-12), 596-601. doi:10.1080/0963828031000137108
83. Ugazio, V. (1989). La Costruzione della Conoscenza: l'Approccio Europeo alla Cognizione del Sociale [The Construction of Knowledge: The European Approach to Social Cognition]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
84. Uppal, S. (2006). Impact of the timing, type and severity of disability on the subjective well-being of individuals with disabilities. Social Science and Medicine, 63(2), 525-539. doi:10.1016/j. socscimed.2006.01.016
85. Verbrugge, L. M., and Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine, 38(1), 1-14. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1
86. Verza, R., Carvalho, M. L. L., Battaglia, M. A., and Uccelli, M. M. (2006). An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Multiple Sclerosis, 12(1), 88-93. doi:10.1191/1352458506ms1233oa
87. Viol, M., Grotkamp, S., van Treeck, B., Nuchtern, E., Hagen, T., Manegold, B., et al. (2006). Personal contextual factors, Part I-A first attempt at a systematic, commented listing of personal contextual factors for sociomedical expertise in the German-speaking region. Gesundheitswesen, 68(12), 747-759. doi:10.1055/s-2006-927328
88. Wade, D. T. (2000). Personal context as a focus for rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14(2), 115-118. doi:10.1191/026921500672636483
89. Waldron, D., and Layton, N. (2008). Hard and soft assistive technology: Defining roles for clinicians. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55(1), 61-64. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00707.x
90. Weigl, M., Cieza, A., Cantista, P., Reinhardt, J. D., and Stucki, G. (2008). Determinants of disability in chronic musculoskeletal health conditions: A literature review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(1), 67-79.
91. World Health Organization (WHO). (1980). ICIDH: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
92. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
93. World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). ICF-CY: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health-Children and Youth Version. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
94. World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
95. Zimmer, Z., and Chappell, N. L. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(5-6), 222-230. doi:10.1080 /096382899297648
96. Zola, I. K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl. 2 Pt. 2), 401-428. doi:10.2307/3350151
97. Zola, I. K. (1993). Disability statistics, what we count and what it tells us: A personal and political analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4(2), 9-39. doi:10.1177/104420739300400202