Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2338-2348

  Gierach, Gretchen L ^a   Geller, Berta M ^b   Shepherd, John A ^c   Patel, Deesha A ^a   Vacek, Pamela M ^b   Weaver, Donald L ^b   Chicoine, Rachael E ^b   Pfeiffer, Ruth M ^a   Fan, Bo ^c   Mahmoudzadeh, Amir Pasha ^c   Wang, Jeff ^c,d   Johnson, Jason M ^b,e   Herschorn, Sally D ^b   Brinton, Louise A ^a   Sherman, Mark E ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ABNORMALITIES; AGE; BODY MASS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; MAMMARY GLAND; MENOPAUSE; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING;

EID: 84920201436     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0257     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:1133-44.
2. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1159-69.
3. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4 ed: Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2003.
4. Yaffe M. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:209.
5. Highnam R, Pan X, Warren R, Jeffreys M, Davey Smith G, Brady M. Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF). Phys Med Biol 2006;51:2695-713.
6. Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ, Rico D, Yang J, Mawdsley GE, et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003;30:352-64.
7. Shepherd JA, Herve L, Landau J, Fan B, Kerlikowske K,Cummings SR. Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4:173-82.
8. Gweon HM, Youk JH, Jeong-Ah K, Son EJ. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:692-7.
9. van Engeland S, Snoeren PR, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N. Volumetric breast density estimation from full- field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:273-82.
10. Malkov S, Wang J, Kerlikowske K, Cummings SR, Shepherd JA. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. Med Phys 2009; 36:5525-36.
11. Ciatto S, Bernardi D, Calabrese M, Durando M, Gentilini MA, Mariscotti G, et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast 2012;21:503-6.
12. Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographic density - Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:201.
13. Martin LJ, Minkin S, Boyd NF. Hormone therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Maturitas 2009;64:20-6.
14. Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, et al. Screen-fi lm mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:418-28.
15. Boyd N, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Maudsley G, Peressotti C, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1754-62.
16. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, Davey Smith G. Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: crosssectional study. Br J Cancer 2008;98:210-6.
17. Lokate M, Kallenberg MG,Karssemeijer N, Van den Bosch MA, Peeters PH, Van Gils CH. Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:3096-105.
18. McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I. Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16: 1148-54.
19. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152: 514-27.
20. Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:627-35.
21. Ding J, Warren R, Warsi I, Day N, Thompson D, Brady M, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1074-81.
22. Stone J, Ding J, Warren RM, Duffy SW. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;124:551-4.
23. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Duewer F, Fan B, Wang J, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1473-82.
24. Gierach GL, Yang XR, Figueroa JD, Sherman ME. Emerging concepts in breast cancer risk prediction. Obstet Gynecol Rep 2013;2:43-52.
25. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1001-8.
26. Breastscreening.cancer.gov [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health [updated 2014 Feb 7; cited 2014 May 21]. Available from: http:// breastscreening.cancer.gov/
27. Prevrhal S, Shepherd JA, Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Kerlikowske K. Accuracy ofmammographic breast density analysis: results of formal operator training. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1389-93.
28. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39: 1629-38.
29. Box G, Cox D. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc 1964; 26:211-522.
30. Stone J, Warren RML, Pinney E, Warwick J, Cuzick J. Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1571-8.
31. Cabanes A, Pastor-Barriuso R, García-López M, Pedraz-Pingarrón C, Sánchez-Contador C, Vázquez Carrete J, et al. Alcohol, tobacco, and mammographic density: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;129:135-47.
32. Butler L, Gold E, Conroy S, Crandall C, Greendale G, Oestreicher N, et al. Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21:301-11.
33. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1622-9.
34. Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:715-22.
35. Weaver DL, Vacek PM, Skelly JM, Geller BM. Predicting biopsy outcome after mammography: what is the likelihood the patient has invasive or in situ breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12: 660-73.
36. Weiss HA, Devesa SS, Brinton LA. Laterality of breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 1996;7:539-43.
37. Perkins CI, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL. Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994-1998. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:637-45.
38. Garfinkel L, Craig L, Seidman H. An appraisal of left and right breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;23:617-31.
39. Jeffreys M, Warren R, HighnamR, Davey Smith G. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. Br J Radiol 2006;79:378-82.
40. Ellison-Loschmann L, McKenzie F, Highnam R, Cave A, Walker J, Jeffreys M. Age and ethnic differences in volumetric breast density in new zealand women: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2013;8: e70217.
41. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1224-37.
42. Wang J, Azziz A, Fan B, Malkov S, Klifa C, Newitt D, et al. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e81653.
43. Sherman ME, Mies C, Gierach GL. Opportunities for molecular epidemiological research on ductal carcinoma in-situ and breast carcinogenesis: Interdisciplinary approaches. Breast Dis 2014;34: 105-16.
44. Ursin G, Hovanessian-Larsen L, Parisky Y, Pike M, Wu A. Greatly increased occurrence of breast cancers in areas of mammographically dense tissue. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R605-R8.
45. Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Hipwell JH, Record C, Wilkinson LS, Moss SM, et al. Localized fibroglandular tissue as a predictor of future tumor location within the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1718-25.