An Invitation to an Event

Understanding Events: From Perception to Action

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Shipley, Thomas F ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Event perception; Feature binding; Grouping; Object perception; Representation; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920138650     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0001     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Avrahami, J., & Kareev, Y. (1994). The emergence of events. Cognition, 53, 239-261.
2. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72, 708-717.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 211-227.
4. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (2000). Views on views: Response to Hayward & Tarr (2000). Vision Research, 40(28), 3901-3905.
5. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1473-1493.
6. Clark, E. V. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp 379-405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cornsweet, T. N. (1970). Visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
8. Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727-738.
9. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Gibbon, J., Malapanic, C., Daleb, C. L., & Gallistel, C. R. (1997). Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: Advances and challenges. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(2), 170-184.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G. A., Reynolds, H. N., & Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 113-116.
13. Hanson, C., & Hanson, S. J. (1996). Development of schemata during event parsing:Neisser's perceptual cycle as a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 119-134.
14. Hayward, W. G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 425-427.
15. Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (2000). Differing views on views: Comments on Biederman and Bar (1999). Vision Research, 40, 3895-3899.
16. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
17. Hespos, S. J., & Rochat, P. (1997). Dynamic representation in infancy. Cognition, 64, 153-189.
18. Hill, H., & Pollick, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223-228.
19. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (in press). Action meets words: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494-500.
21. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
22. Kellman, P. J., Guttman, S. E., & Wickens, T. D. (2001). Geometric and neural models of object perception. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp 181-246). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
23. Klinkenborg, V. (2005, Aug. 23). Grasping the depth of time as a first step in understanding evolution. New York Times.
24. Koslowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
25. Leech, G. (1992). 100 million words of English: The British National Corpus. Language Research, 28(1), 1-13.
26. Michotte, A. (1946). La perception de la causalité. Louvain, France: Institut Superieur de Philosophie.
27. Michotte, A., Thines, G., & Crabbe, G. (1964/1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures (E. Miles & T. R. Miles, trans.). In G. Thines, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Muchisky, M., & Bingham, G. (2002). Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(1), 15-31.
29. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
30. Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480-494.
31. Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
32. Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 387-393.
33. Paterson, H. M., & Pollick, F. E. (2003). Perceptual consequences when combining form and biological motion. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 786a.
34. Pittenger, J. B., & Shaw, R. E. (1975). Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 374-382.
35. Pollick, F. E., Kay, J., Heim, K., & Stringer, R. (2005). Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1247-1265.
36. Reynolds, J. R., Zacks, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2004). A computational model of the role of event structure in perception. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.
37. Riccio, G. E., & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3, 195-240.
38. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7(4), 733-740.
39. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 112(4), 585-615.
40. Shaw, R. E., McIntyre, M., & Mace, W. M. (1974). The role of symmetry in event perception. In R. B. MacLeod & H. L. Pick (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson (pp. 276-310). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
41. Shipley, T. F. (2005). Event path perception: Recognition of transposed spatiotemporal curves. Abstracts of the Psychonomics Society, 10, 46.
42. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1993). Optical tearing in spatiotemporal boundary formation: When do local element motions produce boundaries, form and global motion? Spatial Vision, 7(4), 323-339.
43. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1994). Spatiotemporal boundary formation: Boundary, form, and motion perception from transformations of surface elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(1), 3-20.
44. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (Eds.) (2001). From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
45. Singh, M., & Hoffman, D. D. (2001). Parts-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 401-459). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
46. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Language, speech, and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
48. Tremoulet, P., & Feldman, J., (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951.
49. Troje, N. (2002). The little difference: Fourier-based synthesis of gender specific biological motion. In R. P. Würtz & M. Lappe (Eds.), Dynamic perception (pp. 115-120). Berlin: AKA Press.
50. Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2005). Detection of direction in scrambled motion: A simple "life detector"? Journal of Vision, 5(8), 1058a.
51. Wilder, D. A. (1978a). Effect of predictability on units of perception and attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 281-284.
52. Wilder, D. A. (1978b). Predictability of behaviors, goals, and unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 604-607.
53. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273-293.
54. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3-21.
55. Zalla, T., Verlut, I., Franck, N., Puzenat, D., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Perception of dynamic action in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 128(1), 39-51.