Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010

Journal of Spatial Information Science

Volumn 1, Issue 2010, 2010, Pages 3-20

  Goodchild, Michael F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographic information science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920092331     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1948660X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ABLER, R. F. The National Science Foundation National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1, 4 (1987), 303-326. doi:10.1080/02693798708927819.
2. ANDRIENKO, G., AND ANDRIENKO, N. Interactive maps for visual data exploration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13, 4 (1999), 355-374. doi:10.1080/136588199241247.
3. ANSELIN, L. What is special about spatial data? Tech. Rep. 89-4, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA, 1989.
4. ANSELIN, L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 27(1995), 93-115.
5. BERRY, B. J. L. Approaches to regional analysis: A synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 54, 2 (1964), 2-11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1964.tb00469.x.
6. BUNGE, W. Theoretical Geography, 2nd ed. No. 1 in Lund Studies in Geography Series C: General and Mathematical Geography. Gleerup, Lund, Sweden, 1966.
7. BURROUGH, P. A., AND FRANK, A. U. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. Taylor and Francis, London, 1996.
8. BURROUGH, P. A., AND MCDONNELL, R. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford, New York, 1998. doi:10.1080/10106048609354060.
9. CHRISMAN, N. R., AND YANDELL, B. S. Effects of point error on area calculations: A statistical model. Surveying and Mapping 48 (1988), 241-246.
10. CLARKE, K. C., AND GAYDOS, L. Loose coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, 7 (1998), 699-714.
11. COUCLELIS, H. People manipulate objects but cultivate fields: Beyond the rastervector debate in GIS. In Theories andMethods of Spatial-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, A. U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, Eds. Springer, Berlin, 1992, pp. 105-138.
12. COVA, T. J., AND GOODCHILD, M. F. Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 6 (2002), 509-532. doi:10.1080/13658810210137040.
13. DI BATTISTA, G., EADES, P., TAMASSIA, R., AND TOLLIS, I. G. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999.
14. DORLING, D. F. L. A New Social Atlas of Britain. Wiley, Chichester, 1995.
15. EGENHOFER, M. J., AND FRANK, A. U. Object-oriented modeling for GIS. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 4, 2 (1992), 3-19.
16. EGENHOFER, M. J., AND FRANZOSA, R. D. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5, 2 (1991), 161-174. doi:10.1080/02693799108927841.
17. EGENHOFER, M. J., AND MARK, D. M. Naïve geography. In Proc. COSIT 95, Semmering, Austria, A. Frank and W. Kuhn, Eds., vol. 988 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 1-13.
18. ENGLUND, E. J. Spatial simulation: Environmental applications. In Environmental Modeling with GIS, M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, and L. T. Steyaert, Eds. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
19. FISHER, P. F., Ed. Classics from IJGIS: Twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Science. CRC, Hoboken, NJ, 2006. doi:10.1201/9781420006377.
20. FISHER, P. F., AND PATHIRANA, S. The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sensing of Environment 34 (1990), 121-132. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(90)90103-S.
21. FOTHERINGHAM, A. S., BRUNSDON, C., AND CHARLTON, M. GeographicallyWeighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2002. doi:10.1068/a301905.
22. FRANK, A. U. Qualitative spatial reasoning: Cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 10, 3 (1996), 269-290. doi:10.1080/02693799608902079.
23. GOODCHILD, M., AND GOPAL, S. Accuracy of Spatial Databases. Taylor and Francis, London, 1989.
24. GOODCHILD, M. F. Keynote address: Spatial information science. In Fourth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (Zurich, July 1990) (1990), vol. 1, pp. 3-14.
25. GOODCHILD, M. F. Keynote address-progress on the GIS research agenda. In Second European GIS Conference, Brussels (Utrecht, 1991), EGIS Foundation, pp. 342-350.
26. GOODCHILD, M. F. Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6, 1 (1992), 31-45. doi:10.1080/02693799208901893.
27. GOODCHILD, M. F. The geolibrary. In Innovations in GIS, S. Carver, Ed., vol. 5. Taylor and Francis, London, 1998, pp. 59-68. doi:10.4324/9780203478776 chapter FIVE.
28. GOODCHILD, M. F. Rediscovering the world through GIS: Prospects for a second age of geographical discovery. In GISPlaNET 98, Lisbon (1998).
29. GOODCHILD, M. F. A geographer looks at spatial information theory. In Proc. COSIT 2001, Morro Bay, CA, September, D. R. Montello, Ed., vol. 2205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 2001, pp. 1-13. doi:10.1007/3-540-45424-1_1.
30. GOODCHILD, M. F. Theoretical geography (1962): William Bunge. In Key Texts in Human Geography, P. Hubbard, R. Kitchin, and G. Valentine, Eds. SAGE, Los Angeles, 2008, pp. 9-16.
31. GOODCHILD, M. F. Geographic information systems and science: today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS 15, 1 (2009), 3-9. doi:10.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.160.
32. GOODCHILD, M. F. Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth in press (2010). doi:10.1080/17538941003759255.
33. GOODCHILD, M. F., EGENHOFER, M. J., KEMP, K. K., MARK, D. M., AND SHEPPARD, E. Introduction to the Varenius project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13, 8 (1999), 731-745. doi:10.1080/136588199240996.
34. GOODCHILD, M. F., YUAN, M., AND COVA, T. J. Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21, 3 (2007), 239-260. doi:10.1080/13658810600965271.
35. HARRIE, L., AND SARJAKOSKI, T. Simultaneous graphic generalization of vector data sets. Geoinformatica 6, 3 (2002), 233-261. doi:10.1023/A:1019765902987.
36. HEUVELINK, G., BURROUGH, P., AND STEIN, A. Propagation of errors in spatial modeling with GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 3, 4 (1989), 304-322. doi:10.1080/02693798908941518.
37. KUHN, W., AND FRANK, A. A formalization ofmetaphors and image-schemas in user interfaces. In Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, D. MarkandA. Frank, Eds. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991, pp. 419-434.
38. MARK, D. M. Geographic information science: Critical issues in an emerging crossdisciplinary research domain. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 12, 1 (2000), 45-54.
39. MARK, D. M. Geographic information science: Defining the field. In Foundations of Geographic Information Science, M. Duckham, M. F. Goodchild, andM. F. Worboys, Eds. Taylor and Francis, New York, 2003, pp. 1-18. doi:10.1201/9780203009543.ch1.
40. MARK, D. M., AND FRANK, A. U. Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. Kluwer, Boston, 1991.
41. MARK, D. M., HIRTLE, S. C., EGENHOFER, M. J., AND SMITH, B. Ontological foundations for geographic information science. In A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science, L. Usery and R. B. McMaster, Eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005, pp. 335-350. doi:10.1201/9781420038330.ch12.
42. MONMONIER, M. Geographic brushing: Enhancing exploratory analysis of the scatterplot matrix. Geographical Analysis 21, 1 (1992), 81-84.
43. NATIONAL CENTER FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS (NCGIA). The research plan of the National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 3, 2 (1989), 117-136.
44. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006.
45. SAHR, K., WHITE, D., AND KIMERLING, A. J. Geodesic discrete global grid systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30, 2 (2003), 121-134.
46. SAMET, H. TheDesign and Analysis of SpatialData Structures. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.
47. SINTON, D. The inherent structure of information as a constraint to analysis: Mapped thematic data as a case study. In Harvard Papers on GIS, G. Dutton, Ed., vol. 7. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978.
48. SUI, D. Z. Tobler's first law of geography: A big idea for a small world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2004), 269-277. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402003.x.
49. TAKEYAMA, M., AND COUCLELIS, H. Map dynamics: Integrating cellular automata and GIS through geo-algebra. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11 (1997), 73-91. doi:10.1080/136588197242509.
50. TOMLIN, C. D. Geographic Information Systems and Cartographic Modeling. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.
51. TURNER, A. Introduction to Neogeography. OReilly, Sebastopol, CA, 2006.
52. UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE (UCGIS). Research priorities of the University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 23, 3 (1996).
53. USERY, L., AND MCMASTER, R. B., Eds. A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004. doi:10.1201/9781420038330.
54. WORBOYS, M. F., HEARNSHAW, H. M., AND MAGUIRE, D. J. Object-oriented data modelling for spatial databases. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 4, 4 (1990), 369-383. doi:10.1080/02693799008941553.
55. WRIGHT, D. J., GOODCHILD, M. F., AND PROCTOR, J. D. Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as 'tool' versus 'science'. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87, 2 (1997), 346-362. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.872057.
56. YUAN, M. Representing complex geographic phenomena with both object- and fieldlike properties. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28, 2 (2001), 83-96.
57. YUAN, M., AND HORNSBY, K. S., Eds. Computation and Visualization for Understanding Dynamics in Geographic Domains. CRC, Boca Raton, 2008. doi:10.1201/9781420060331.