Defending indigenous water rights with the laws of a dominant culture: The case of the United States

Liquid Relations: Contested Water Rights and Legal Complexity

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 44-65

  Getches, David H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920025398     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564-576 (1908).
2. Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963).
3. Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963). Ibid.
4. Colorado River Water Consewation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800-810 (1976).
5. United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375-384 (1886).
6. In re General Adjudication of All Righ ts to Use Water in the Big Horn River System, 753 P.2d 76, affirmed, Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406 (1989).
7. N. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. County of Maricopa, 972 P.2d 179 (Ariz. 1999).
8. In re Snake River Basin Water System, 764 P.2d 78 (Idaho 1988).
9. Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963).
10. Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605 (1983).
11. Nevada v. United States, 463 U.S. no.1 (1983).
12. Skeem v. United States, 273 Fed. 93, 9th Cir. (1921);.
13. Holly v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, 655 . Supp. 557, E.D. Wash. (1985);.
14. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324 (1983).
15. Arizona v. California, 439 U.S. 419 (1979).
16. In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System, 835 P.2d 273, Wyo. (1992).