The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 9-10, 2014, Pages 334-340

  Ruhotina, Nedim ^a   Dagenais, Julien ^a   Gandaglia, Giorgio ^b   Sood, Akshay ^c,d   Abdollah, Firas ^d   Chang, Steven L ^a,c   Leow, Jeffrey J ^c   Olugbade, Kola ^a   Rai, Arun ^a   Sammon, Jesse D ^c,d   Schmid, Marianne ^c   Varda, Briony ^a   Zorn, Kevin C ^b   Menon, Mani ^d   Kibel, Adam S ^a   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^a,c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919920887     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: 19201214     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2170     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:679-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027
2. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038
3. Sood A, Ghani KR, Ahlawat R, et al. Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL Phase 2a-b). Eur Urol 2014;66:371-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.055
4. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, et al. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:401-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.05.169
5. Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, et al. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013;64:786-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012
6. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa012337
7. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Colletti LM, et al. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 2004;139:137-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.137
8. Khuri SF, Najjar SF, Daley J, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ann Surg 2001;234:370-82; discussion 382-73.
9. Duchene DA, Rosso F, Clayman R, et al. Current minimally invasive practice patterns among postgraduate urologists. J Endourol 2011;25:1797-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0092
10. Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, et al. Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 2006;132:159-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.578
11. Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, et al. Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 2012;203:347-51; discussion 351-2.
12. Itani KM, DePalma RG, Schifftner T, et al. Surgical resident supervision in the operating room and outcomes of care in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Am J Surg 2005;190:725-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.042
13. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, et al. Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:19-26; discussion 26-18.
14. Kern SQ, Lustik MB, McMann LP, et al. Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Endourol 2014;28:40-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0051
15. Caras RJ, Lustik MB, Kern SQ, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates less morbidity than open radical prostatectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with a focus on surgical trainee involvement. J Endourol 2014;28:298-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0475
16. Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg 2009;198:S19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg. 2009.07.025
17. ACS-NSQIP. ACS-NSQIP data collection, analysis, and reporting. Available at http://site.acsnsqip.org/program-specifics/data-collection-analysis-and-reporting. Accessed September 17, 2014.
18. Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, et al. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urology 2013;82:579-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080
19. Bridges M, Diamond DL. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 1999;177:28-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00289-X
20. Curet MJ. Resident work hour restrictions: where are we now? J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:767-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.010
21. Ku TS, Kane CJ, Sen S, et al. Effects of hospital procedure volume and resident training on clinical outcomes and resource use in radical retropubic prostatectomy surgery in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Urol 2008;179:272-8; discussion 278-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.149
22. Hoag NA, Mamut A, Afshar K, et al. Trends in urology resident exposure to minimally invasive surgery for index procedures: A tale of two countries. J Surg Educ 2012;69:670-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.007
23. Castleberry AW, Clary BM, Migaly J, et al. Resident education in the era of patient safety: A nationwide analysis of outcomes and complications in resident-assisted oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:3715-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3079-2
24. Trinh QD, Schmitges J, Sun M, et al. Does partial nephrectomy at an academic institution result in better outcomes? World J Urol 2012;30:505-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0759-z
25. Kiran RP, Ahmed Ali U, Coffey JC, et al. Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2012;256:469-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265812a
26. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;58:340-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.047
27. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, et al. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 2013;258:440-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a191ca
28. Wong BM, Levinson W, Shojania KG. Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions. Med Educ 2012;46:107-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x
29. Coburn M, Amling C, Bahnson RR, et al. Urology milestones. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5(1 Suppl 1):79-98.
30. Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2011;254:502-9; discussion 509-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6994
31. Davis JW, Kamat A, Munsell M, et al. Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized? BJU Int 2010;105:1148-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08997.x