Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica

Chemosphere

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 223-231

  Mumford, K A ^a   Rayner, J L ^b   Snape, I ^c   Stevens, G W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC DIVISION   (Australia)

Author keywords

Freeze thaw processes; Hydraulics; Permeable reactive barrier; Remediation

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DISINTEGRATION; FREEZING; GASOLINE; HYDRAULICS; HYDROCARBONS; NUTRIENTS; PARTICLE SIZE; PETROLEUM ANALYSIS; REMEDIATION; RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTION; THAWING;

FREEZE-THAW PROCESS; IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS; PARTICLE DISINTEGRATION; PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS; PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS; TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS; TREATMENT COMBINATIONS;

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS;

PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER POLLUTANT;

FREEZE-THAW CYCLE; OIL SPILL; PARTICLE SIZE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERMEABILITY; REACTIVE BARRIER; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ANTARCTICA; ARTICLE; BIOREMEDIATION; CATCHMENT; DEGRADATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FREEZE THAWING; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDROLOGY; OIL SPILL; PERMEABILITY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION;

ANTARCTICA; CASEY STATION; EAST ANTARCTICA;

ANTARCTIC REGIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; HYDROLOGY; PERMEABILITY; PETROLEUM POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84919918355     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gavaskar, A., Sass, B., Gupta, S., Drescher, E., Yoon, W.-S., Sminchak, J., Janosy, R., Hicks, J., Condit, W., 2002. Evaluating the longevity and hydraulic performance of permeable reactive barriers at department of defense sites, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center.
2. Gibert O., Cortina J.L., de Pablo J., Ayora C. Performance of a field-scale permeable reactive barrier based on organic substrate and zero-valent iron for in situ remediation of acid mine drainage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20:7854-7862.
3. Gore D.B., Heiden E.S., Snape I., Nash G., Stevens G.W. Grain size of activated carbon, and untreated and modified granular clinoptilolite under freeze-thaw: applications to permeable reactive barriers. Polar Rec. 2006, 42:121-126.
4. Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 24:401-423.
5. Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. Impact of solids formation and gas production on the permeability of ZVI PRBs. J. Environ. Eng. - ASCE 2011, 137:689-696.
6. Henry J.L., Ruaya A.L., Garton A. The kinetics of polyolefin oxidation in aqueous media. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 1992, 30:1693-1703.
7. Hornig G., Northcott K., Snape I., Stevens G. Assessment of sorbent materials for treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated ground water in cold regions. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2008, 53:83-91.
8. Johnson R.L., Thoms R.B., Johnson R.O., Krug T. Field evidence for flow reduction through a zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier. Ground Water Monit. Remediation 2008, 28:47-55.
9. Kalinovich I., Rutter A., Poland J.S., Cairns G., Rowe R.K. Remediation of PCB contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic: excavation and surface PRB technology. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 407:53-66.
10. Kalinovich I.K., Rutter A., Rowe R.K., Poland J.S. Design and application of surface PRBs for PCB remediation in the Canadian Arctic. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 101:124-133.
11. Lai K.C.K., Lo I.M.C., Birkelund V., Kjeldsen P. Field monitoring of a permeable reactive barrier for removal of chlorinated organics. J. Environ. Eng. - ASCE 2006, 132:199-210.
12. Levenspiel O. Chemical Reaction Engineering 1999, John Wiley & Sons.
13. Liu S.J., Li X.G., Wang H.X. Hydraulics analysis for groundwater flow through permeable reactive barriers. Environ. Model. Assess. 2011, 16:591-598.
14. Moraci N., Calabro P.S. Heavy metals removal and hydraulic performance in zero-valent iron/pumice permeable reactive barriers. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91:2336-2341.
15. Mumford K.A., Rayner J.L., Snape I., Stark S.C., Stevens G.W., Gore D.B. Design, installation and preliminary testing of a permeable reactive barrier for diesel fuel remediation at Casey Station, Antarctica. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2013, 96:96-107.
16. Mushovic P., Bartlett T., Morrison S.J. Hydraulic conductivity loss at the Monticello PRB leads to trial use of ex-situ treatment cell. Technol. News Trends 2006, 1.
17. Northcott K.A., Snape I., Connor M.A., Stevens G.W. Water treatment design for site remediation at Casey Station, Antarctica: site characterisation and particle separation. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:169-185.
18. Parbs A., Ebert M., Dahmke A. Influence of mineral precipitation on the performance and long-term stability of Fe-0-permeable reactive barriers: a review on the basis of 19 Fe-0-reactive barrier sites. Grundwasser 2007, 12:267-281.
19. Passeport E., Vidon P., Forshay K.J., Harris L., Kaushal S.S., Kellogg D.Q., Lazar J., Mayer P., Stander E.K. Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers. Environ. Manage. 2013, 51:392-413.
20. Paudyn K., Rutter A., Rowe K., Poland J.S. Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2008, 53:102-114.
21. Rakowska M.I., Kupryianchyk D., Smit M.P.J., Koelmans A.A., Grotenhuis J.T.C., Rijnaarts H.H.M. Kinetics of hydrophobic organic contaminant extraction from sediment by granular activated carbon. Water Res. 2014, 51:86-95.
22. Sanscartier D., Laing T., Reimer K., Zeeb B. Bioremediation of weathered petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination in the Canadian high Arctic: laboratory and field studies. Chemosphere 2009, 77:1121-1126.
23. Sanscartier D., Zeeb B., Koch I., Reimer K. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil by heated and humidified biopile system in cold climates. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2009, 55:167-173.
24. Schipper L.A., Barkle G.F., Hadfield J.C., Vojvodic-Vukovic M., Burgess C.P. Hydraulic constraints on the performance of a groundwater denitrification wall for nitrate removal from shallow groundwater. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2004, 69:236-279.
25. Seki K., Thullner M., Hanada J., Miyazaki T. Moderate bioclogging leading to preferential flow paths in biobarriers. Ground Water Monit. Remediation 2006, 26:68-76.
26. USEPA Granular Activated Carbon Systems: Problems and Remedies 1984, United States Environmental Protection Authority, Washington D.C.
27. Wanner C., Zink S., Eggenberger U., Mader U. Unraveling the partial failure of a permeable reactive barrier using a multi-tracer experiment and Cr isotope measurements. Appl. Geochem. 2013, 37:125-133.
28. Wilkin R.T., Acree S.D., Ross R.R., Puls R.W., Lee T.R., Woods L.L. Fifteen-year assessment of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of chromate and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468:186-194.
29. Wilkin R.T., Puls R.W., Sewell G.W. Long-term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero-valent iron: geochemical and microbiological effects. Ground Water 2003, 41:493-503.