Science evaluation in the czech republic: The case of universities

Societies

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 266-279

  Fiala, Dalibor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech universities; Evaluation; Methodology; Rankings; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919881965     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20754698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/soc3030266     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Vaněček, J. Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research publications from 1994 to 2005. Scientometrics 2008, 77, 345–360.
2. Vaněček, J. Patenting propensity in the Czech Republic. Scientometrics 2008, 75, 381–394.
3. Vaněček, J.; Fatun, M.; Albrecht, V. Bibliometric evaluation of the FP-5 and FP-6 results in the Czech Republic. Scientometrics 2010, 83, 103–114.
4. Gorraiz, J.; Reimann, R.; Gumpenberger, C. Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: A case study for Austria and six countries. Scientometrics 2011, 91, 417–433.
5. Radosevic, S.; Auriol, L. Patterns of restructuring in research, development and innovation activities in Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on S&T indicators. Res. Pol. 1999, 28, 351–376.
6. Geuna, A.; Martin, B.R. University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva 2003, 41, 277–304.
7. Hicks, D. Performance-based university research funding systems. Res. Pol. 2012, 41, 251–261.
8. Bucheli, V.; Díaz, A.; Calderón, J.P.; Lemoine, P.; Valdivia, J.A.; Villaveces, J.L.; Zarama, R. Growth of scientific production in Colombian universities: An intellectual capital-based approach. Scientometrics 2012, 91, 369–382.
9. Buela-Casal, G.; Paz Bermúdez, M.; Sierra, J.C.; Quevedo-Blasco, R.; Castro, A.; Guillén Riquelme, A. Ranking 2010 in production and research productivity in Spanish public universities. Psicothema 2011, 23, 527–536.
10. Li, F.; Yi, Y.; Guo, X.; Qi, W. Performance evaluation of research universities in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: Based on a two-dimensional approach. Scientometrics 2012, 90, 531–542.
11. Matthews, A.P. South African universities in world rankings. Scientometrics 2012, 92, 675–695.
12. Wu, H.Y.; Chen, J.K.; Chen, I.S.; Zhuo, H.H. Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model. Measurement 2012, 45, 856–880.
13. Abramo, G.; Cicero, T.; D'Angelo, C.A. A sensitivity analysis of research institutions’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation. J. Informetrics 2012, 6, 298–306.
14. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Costa, F.D. National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics 2011, 89, 929–941.
15. Franceschet, M.; Costantini, A. The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective. J. Informetrics 2011, 5, 275–291.
16. 2 index as a possible alternative. Scientometrics 2012, 91, 751–771.
17. Research and Development in the Czech Republic. Available online: http://www.vyzkum.cz/(accessed on 1 April 2013).