Performance characterisation of a stormwater treatment bioretention basin

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 150, Issue , 2015, Pages 173-178

  Mangangka, Isri R ^a   Liu, An ^b,c   Egodawatta, Prasanna ^d   Goonetilleke, Ashantha ^d  

^a SAM RATULANGI UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Kyoto University Tsinghua University ^*  (China)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bioretention basin; Rainfall characteristics; Stormwater pollutant processes; Stormwater quality; Stormwater treatment

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; NITRITE; NITROGEN DERIVATIVE; RAIN; STORM WATER;

BASIN MANAGEMENT; DISCHARGE; LEACHING; NITRIFICATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RAINFALL; STORMWATER; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; FLOW MEASUREMENT; LEACHING; NUTRIENT; SOIL MOISTURE; WATER CYCLE; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER QUALITY; WATER RETENTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; HYDROLOGY; PROCEDURES; WATER FLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; HYDROLOGY; RAIN; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84919880225     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams M.J. Chemometrics in Analytical Chemistry 1995, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
3. AS/NZS 5667.1 Water Quality - Sampling: Guidance on the Design of Sampling Programs, Sampling Techniques and the Preservation and Handling of Samples 1998, Australian/New Zealand Standard.
4. Davis A.P. Field performance of bioretention: water quality. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 248:1048-1063.
5. Davis A.P. Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts. J.Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(2):90-95.
6. Davis A.P., Hunt W.F., Traver R.G., Clar M. Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J.Environ. Eng. 2009, 135(3):109-117.
7. Dietz M.E., Clausen J.C. Afield evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005, 167(1-4):123-138.
8. Dunstone G., Graham H. Water Sensitive Urban Design. Guidelines 2005, Mildura Rural City Council, Melbourne.
9. Egodawatta P., Goonetilleke A. Characteristics of pollutants build-up on residential road surfaces. The 7th International Conference on HydroScience and Engineering, Philadelphia, USA 2006, Available at:. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12660/.
10. Egodawatta P., Goonetilleke A., Ayoko G.A., Thomas E.C. Understanding the interrelationships between stormwater quality and rainfall and runoff factors in residential catchments. The 7th International Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling and the 4th International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design, Melbourne, Australia 2006, Available at:. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4037/.
11. Goonetilleke A., Thomas E., Ginn S., Gilbert D. Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. J.Environ. Manag. 2005, 74(1):31-42.
12. Guo J.C.Y., Urbonas B. Maximized detention volume determined by runoff capture ratio. J.Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 1996, 122(1):33-39.
13. Hatt B.E., Fletcher T.D., Deletic A. Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42(7):2535-2541.
14. Hatt B.E., Fletcher T.D., Deletic A. Pollutant removal performance of field-scale stormwater biofiltration systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(8):1567-1576.
15. Hatt B.E., Fletcher T.D., Deletic A. Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J.Hydrol. 2009, 365(3-4):310-321.
16. Heasom W., Traver R.G., Welker A. Hydrologic modeling of a bioretention best management practice. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2006, 42(5):1329-1347.
17. Hsieh C.H., Davis A.P. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban stormwater runoff. J.Environ. Eng. 2005, 131(11):1521-1531.
18. Hunt W., Jarrett A., Smith J., Sharkey L. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J.Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2006, 132(6):600-608.
19. Hunt W.F., Smith J.T., Jadlocki S.J. Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C. J.Environ. Eng. 2008, 134(5):403-408.
20. Kokot S., Grigg M., Panayioyou H., Phuong T.D. Data interpretation by some common chemometric methods. Electroanalysis 1998, 10:1081-1088.
21. Liu A., Goonetilleke A., Egodawatta P. Taxonomy for rainfall events based on pollutant wash-off potential in urban areas. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 47:110-114.
22. Liu A., Guan Y.T., Egodawatta P., Goonetilleke A. Selecting rainfall events for effective water sensitive urban design (WSUD) implementation. The 16th International Conference on Diffuse Pollution and Eutrophication, Beijing, China 2013, Available at:. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63407/.
23. Mangangka I. Role of Hydraulic Factors in Constructed Wetland and Bioretention Basin Treatment Performance 2012, (PhD thesis), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
24. Miguntanna N.P., Liu A., Egodawatta P., Goonetilleke A. Characterising nutrients wash-off for effective urban stormwater treatment design. J.Environ. Manag. 2013, 120:61-67.
25. Parker N., Gardner T., Goonetilleke A., Egodawatta P., Giglio D. Effectiveness of WSUD in the 'real world'. The 6th International Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference and the 3rd Hydropolis: Towards Water Sensitive Cities and Citizens, Perth, Western Australia 2009, Available at:. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/26520/.
26. Passeport E., Hunt W.F., Line D.E., Smith R.A., Brown R.A. Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution. J.Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2009, 135(4):505-510.
27. StatistiXL StatistiXL Manual, Australia 2007.
28. Vaze J., Chiew F.H.S. Experimental study of pollutant accumulation on an urban road surface. Urban Water 2002, 4(4):379-389.