Assessing wetland-riparian amphibian and reptile communities of the Mid-Atlantic region

Mid-Atlantic Freshwater Wetlands: Advances in Wetlands Science, Management, Policy, and Practice

Volumn 9781461455967, Issue , 2013, Pages 313-337

  Julian, James T ^a   Rocco, Gianluca ^b   Turner, Melinda M ^c   Brooks, Robert P ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c State College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919868987     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5596-7_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Brooks RP, Brinson MM, Havens KJ, Hershner CS, Rheinhardt RD, Wardrop DH, Whigham DF, Jacobs AD, Rubbo JM (2011) Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA. Wetlands 31(2):207-219
2. Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Bishop JA (2004) Assessing wetland condition on a watershed basis in the Mid-Atlantic region using synoptic land cover maps. Environ Monit and Assess 94:9-22
3. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
4. Crother BI (ed) (2008) Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North American north of Mexico, 6th edn. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herptological Circular 37, p 1-84
5. Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
6. Dahl TE (2011) Status and trends of wetland in the conterminous United State 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, p 108
7. Dettmers R, Buehler DA, Bartlett JB (2002) A test and comparison of wildlife-habitat modelling techniques for predicting bird occurrence at a regional scale. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 607-616
8. Farr MM (2003) Amphibian assemblage response to anthropogenic disturbance in Pennsylvania wetlands. M.S. Thesis. Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, p 190
9. Fike J (1999) Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA
10. Hepinstall JA, Krohn WB, Sader SA (2002) Effects of niche width on the performance and agreement of avian habitat models. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 593-606
11. Hulse AC, McCoy CJ, Censky E (2001) Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, p 419
12. Julian JT (2009) Evaluating amphibian occurrence models and the importance of small, isolated wetlands in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area. PhD. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, p 181
13. Klemens MW (1993) Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut. Bulletin No. 112. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
14. Klute DS, Lovallo MJ, Tzilkowski WM (2002) Autologistic regression modeling of American woodcock habitat use with spatially dependent data. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 335-343
15. Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA, Mossman MJ, Hemesath LM, Lannoo MJ (1999) Effect of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Conserv Biol 13:1437-1446
16. Kolozsvary MB, Swihart RK (1999) Habitat fragtmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland. Can J Zool 77:1288-1299
17. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GD, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248-2255
18. McCoy CJ (1989) The amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania wetlands: an ecological survey. Pages 171-182. In: Majumdar SK, Brooks RP, Benner FJ, Tiner RW (eds) Wetlands ecology and conservation: emphasis in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, PA, p 395
19. Pauly GB, Hillis DM, Cannatella DC (2009) Taxonomic freedom and the role of official lists of species names. Herpetologica 65:115-128
20. Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London
21. Shaffer LL (1991) Pennsylvania amphibians and reptiles. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Harrisburg, PA, p 160
22. Shiner SA, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL (2002) A GIS-based habitat model for wood thrush, Hylocichia mustelina, in Great Smokey mountains National Park. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 529-536
23. Snyder CD, Julian JT, Young AJ, King TL (2005) Assessment of Ambystomatid salamander populations and their breeding habitats in Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Report submitted to National Park Service, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area
24. Suzuki N, Olson DH, Reilly EC (2008) Developing landscape habitat models for rare amphibians with small geographic ranges: a case study of Siskiyou Mountains salamanders in the western USA. Biodivers Conserv 17:2197-2218
25. Tiner RW (2005) In search of swampland: a wetland sourcebook and field guide, 2nd edn. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, p 330