Publishing patterns of top molecular and cellular biologists in subscription model versus open access journals, 2011-2013

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 383-396

  Stankus, Tony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell Press; Nature Publications Group; Open Access science journals; Public Library of Science; subscription model science journals

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY; LIBRARIES; PAPER; PRESSES (MACHINE TOOLS); PUBLISHING;

CELL PRESS; NATURE PUBLICATION GROUP; OPEN ACCESS SCIENCE JOURNAL; OPENACCESS; PUBLIC LIBRARY; PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE; SCIENCE JOURNALS; SUBSCRIPTION MODEL SCIENCE JOURNAL; SUBSCRIPTION MODELS;

CELLS;

EID: 84919845940     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2014.950403     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. BioMed Central. 2014. About us. http://www.biomedcentral.com/about.
2. Chant, I. 2014. Academic: Science launches OA journal. Library Journal 139 (5): 19.
3. Chaudhuri, J., and M. Thohira. 2010. Usage of Open-Access journals: Findings from eleven top science and medical journals. Serials Librarian 58 (1-4): 97-105. doi:10.1080/0361526100362307.
4. eLIFE. 2014. Why publish with us? http://elifesciences.org/about#why.
5. Frandsen, T. 2009a. Attracted to open access journals: A bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology. Journal of Documentation 65 (1): 58-82.
6. Frandsen, T. 2009b. The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields. Information Processing & Management 4. (1): 131-141. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.00.
7. Gumpenberger, C., M. A. Ovalle-Perandones, and J. Gorraiz. 2013. On the impact of Gold Open Access journals. Scientometrics 96 (1): 221-238. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0902-7
8. Kozak, M., and J. Hartley. 2013. Publication fees for open access journals: Different disciplines-different methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 64 (12): 2591-2594. doi:10.1002/asi.2297.
9. Lewis, D. W. 2012. The inevitability of Open Access. College & Research Libraries 73 (5): 493-506.
10. McCabe, M. J., C. M. Snyder, and A. Fagin. 2013. Open access versus traditional journal pricing: Using a simple "platform market" model to understand which will win (and which should). Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (1): 11-19. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.03.
11. PLOS Biology. 2014. PLOS Biology guidelines for authors. http://www.plosbiology.org/static/guidelines%3Bjsessionid=A5A46C9212C875109B9C766706535506. criteria
12. criteria. PLOS ONE. 2014. All good science deserves to be published. http://www.plosone.org/static/publish.
13. Potvin, S. 2013. The principle and the pragmatist. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (1): 67-75. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.00.
14. Reinsfelder, T. L., and J. A. Anderson. 2013. Observations and perceptions of academic administrator influence on Open Access initiatives. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (6): 481-487. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.01.
15. Stankus, T., and S. Spiegel. 2009. The SLA DBIO 100 Poll: 100 journals voted by SLA's BioMedical and Life Sciences Division as the most influential over the last 100 years. Serials Review 35 (4): 202-212. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2009.08.01.
16. Tomaszewski, R., S. Poulin, and K. I. MacDonald. 2013. Publishing in disciplinespecific Open Access journals: Opportunities and outreach for librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (1): 61-66.
17. VanDuinkerken, W., and W. Kaspar. 2013. Continuing the discussion on OA and the role of libraries as publishers. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (6): 445-446. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.09.00.
18. Walters, W. H., and A. C. Linvill. 2011. Characteristics of Open Access journals in six subject areas. College & Research Libraries 72 (4): 372-392.
19. Walters, W. H., and E. Wilder. 2007. The cost implications of Open-Access publishing in the life sciences. Bioscience 57 (7): 619-625. doi:10.1641/B57070.
20. Wen, Y. L., and J.-L. Hsieh. 2013. Informetric analysis on Open-Access high productivity authors in biomedical area. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 51 (2): 219-224. doi:10.6120/JoEMLS.2013.512/0582.RS.AM