The current status of forensic soil examination in the Russian Federation

Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 61-73

  Gradusova, Olga ^a   Nesterina, Ekaterina ^a  

^a Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Research   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919842176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Adya M and Collopy F (1998). How effective are neural networks at forecasting and prediction? A review and evaluation. Journal of Forecasting 17:481-495.
2. Aitken C and Taroni F (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (Statistics in Practice). 2nd edition. Wiley, Chichester.
3. Aitken C, Biedermann A, Garbolino P and Taroni F (2008). Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science (Statistics in Practice). Statistical Papers 49:393-394.
4. Anshits NN, Anshits AG, Bayukov OA, Salanov AN and Vereshchagina TA (2005).The nature of nanoparticles of crystalline phase in cenospheres and morphology of their shells. Glass Physics and Chemistry 31:306-315.
5. Biedermann A and Taroni F (2006). Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data. Forensic Science International 57:163-167.
6. Bogatyryev VS (2001). Opportunities of statistical research of small parts for reconstruction of material conditions of material evidences being. In: Proceedings of Criminalistics of 21st Century, pp. 364-368. MVD, Moscow.
7. Carresy P, Causin V, Marigo A and Schiavone S (2004). Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fiber evidence in a double murder - A case report. Forensic Science International 141:151-170.
8. Cengiz S, Karaca AC, Çakir I, Üner HBand Sevendic A (2004). SEM-EDS analysis and discrimination of forensic soil. Forensic Science International 141:33-37.
9. Consoly NC, Heineck KS, Coop MR, Fonseca AV and Ferreira C (2007). Coal bottom ash as a geomaterial: influence of particle morphology on the behavior of granular materials. Soils and Foundations 47(2):361-373.
10. Fitzpatrick EA (1993). Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology. Wiley, Chichester.
11. Kazdym AA (2006). Technogenic minerals of cultural layers. In: A Technogenic Sediments of Ancient and Modern Urban Territories. Paleoecological Aspect (Ed. SA Nesmeyanov), pp. 116-120. Nauka, Moscow.
12. Khan KY, Pozdnyakov AI and Son BK (2007). Structure and stability of soil aggregates. Eurasian Soil Science 4:451-456.
13. Koldin VY (1996). Expert identification in forensic examinations. Theoretical basis. (Methodical manual for post-graduates, investigators and judges). RFCFR at the Ministry of Justice, Moscow.
14. Mitrychev VS (1976). Criminalistic identification of the whole in parts. In: Theory and Practice of Identification the Whole in Parts. Collection of Research Works 24:3-111.VNIISE at the Ministry of Justice, Moscow.
15. Parfeneva E and Yarilova E (1977). The Manual for Micro Morphological Researches in Soil Science. Nauka, Moscow.
16. Pye K and Blott SJ (2004). Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry. Forensic Science International 144:19-27.
17. Pye K and Croft DJ (2007). Forensic analysis of soil and sediment traces by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis: An experimental investigation. Forensic Science International 165:52-63.
18. Pye K, Blott SJ, Croft DJ and Witton SJ (2007). Discrimination between sediment and soil samples for forensic purposes using elemental data: An investigation of particle size effects. Forensic Science International 167:30-42.
19. Rawlins BG, Semon SJ, Hodgkinson EH, Riding JB, Vane KH, Poulton C and Freeborough K (2006). Potential and pitfalls in establishing the provenance of earth-related samples in forensic investigations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51:832-844.
20. Ruffell A and Wiltshire P (2004). Conjunctive use of quantitative and qualitative X-ray diffraction analysis of soils and rocks for forensic analysis. Forensic Science International 145:13-23.
21. Sjerps M (2006). The role of statistics in forensic science casework and research. Problems of Forensic Science 55:82-90.
22. Tjurikova VV (1976). The conception of identification the whole in parts in soil forensic examination. In: Theory and Practice of Identification the Whole in Parts. Collection of Research Works 24:128-130.VNIISE at the Ministry of Justice, Moscow.
23. Tjurikova VV (1980). Local grounds as an object of criminalistic identification. In: Theoretical and Methodical Questions of Forensic Soil Examination. Collection of Research Works 47:13-27. VNIISE at the Ministry of Justice, Moscow.
24. Vereshchagina TA, Anshits NN, Zykova ID and Salanov AN (2001). Preparation of cenospheres of controlled composition from energy ashes and their properties. Chemistry for Sustainable Development 9:306-315.
25. VNIISE (1993). Complex methods of forensic soil examination in 3 parts. The methodical recommendations for experts, inspectors and judges. VNIISE at the Ministry of Justice, Moscow.
26. Yukun C, Xiaofeng L and Yunfeng L (2004). An e-mail filtering approach using neural network. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Advances in Neural Networks (Ed. D Hutchison), pp. 688-694.Springer, Berlin.