The Duration of Automation Bias in a Realistic Setting

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 287-299

  de Boer, Robert J ^a   Heems, Wijnand ^a   Hurts, Karel ^b  

^a AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b CogniTech ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919763890     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508414.2014.949205     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bahner, J. E., Elepfandt, M. F., & Manzey, D. (2008). Misuse of diagnostic aids in process control: The effects of automation misses on complacency and automation bias. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 1330–1334. doi:10.1177/154193120805201906
2. Baxter, G., Besnard, D., & Riley, D. (2007). Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: Will they ever be a thing of the past? Applied Ergonomics, 38, 417–423.
3. De Boer, R. J. (2012). Seneca’s error: An affective model of cognitive resistance. Industrial design engineering. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
4. Dekker, S. (2009). Report of the flight crew human factors investigation conducted for the Dutch safety board into the accident of TK1951, Boeing 737–800 near Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, February 25, 2009 (p. 127). Lund, Sweden: Lund University, School of Aviation.
5. Dimitrova, N. G. (2014). Rethinking errors: How error-handling strategy affects our thoughts and others’ thoughts about us. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit.
6. Dougherty, E. M. J., & Fragola, J. R. (1988). Foundations for a time reliability correlation system to quantify human reliability. In Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants (pp. 268–278). Monterey, CA: IEEE.
7. Dutch Safety Board. (2010). Crashed during approach, Boeing 737–800, near Amsterdam Schiphol airport, 25 February 2009. The Hague, The Netherlands: Author.
8. Ferris, T., Sarter, N., & Wickens, C. D. (2010). Cockpit automation: Still struggling to catch up. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human Factors in Aviation (2nd ed.; pp. 473–478). New York, NY: Elsevier Publishers.
9. Georgio, G. A. (2006). Probability of detection (PoD) curves: Derivation, applications and limitations. London, UK: Health and Safety Executive.
10. Heems, W., Speet, A., & Stam, R. (2012). Automation surprise, mismatch between human-automation properties and capabilities. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
11. Hollnagel, E. (2009). The ETTO principle: Efficiency-thoroughness trade-off. Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12. Manzey, D., Reichenbach, J., & Onnasch, L. (2012). Human performance consequences of automated decision aids: The impact of degree of automation and system experience. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6, 57–87. doi:10.1177/1555343411433844
13. Mosier, K., & Skitka, L. (1996). Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 201–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Mouloua, M., Hancock, P. A., Jones, L., Vincenzi, D., & Kantowitz, B. H. (2010). Automation in aviation systems: Issues and considerations. In J. A. Wise, V. D. Hopkin, & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors (2nd ed.; 8.1–8.11). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
15. Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors, 52, 381–410. doi:10.1177/0018720810376055
16. Pritchett, A. R. (2009). Aviation automation: General perspectives and specific guidance for the design of modes and alerts. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5, 82–113. doi:10.1518/155723409X448026
17. Rankin, A., Woltjer, R., Field, J., & Woods, D. (2013). Staying ahead of the aircraft and managing surprise in modern airliners. In D. Woods (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Resilience Engineering Symposium. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: TNO.
18. Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
19. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074. doi:10.1068/p2952
20. van Dijk, H., van de Merwe, K., & Zon, R. (2011). A coherent impression of the pilots’ situation awareness: Studying relevant human factors tools. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21, 343–356.
21. Veitengruber, J. E. (1978). Design criteria for aircraft warning, caution, and advisory alerting systems. Journal of Aircraft, 15, 574–581. doi:10.2514/3.58409
22. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 201–212. doi:10.1080/14639220500370105
23. Woods, D. D., Dekker, S., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I., & Sarter, N. (2010). Behind human error (2nd ed.). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.