On the local well-posedness of the prandtl and hydrostatic euler equations with multiple monotonicity regions

SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 3865-3890

  Kukavica, Igor ^a   Masmoudi, Nader ^b   Vicol, Vlad ^c   Wong, Tak Kwong ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary layer; Euler equations; Hydrostatic balance; Inviscid limit; Navier Stokes equations; Prandtl equations

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; EULER EQUATIONS; HYDRAULICS;

BOUNDARY LAYER EQUATIONS; HYDROSTATIC BALANCE; INVISCID LIMITS; LOCAL EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS; LOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS; MONOTONICITY; PRANDTL EQUATIONS;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 84919723225     PISSN: 00361410     EISSN: 10957154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/140956440     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. R. Alexandre, Y.-G. Wang, C.-J. Xu, and T. Yang, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation in Sobolev spaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc., arXiv: 1203.5991 [math.AP], 2014.
2. K. Asano, A note on the abstract Cauchy-Kowalewski theorem, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci., 64 (1988), pp. 102-105.
3. p theory, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 12 (2010), pp. 397-411.
4. H. Beirão da Veiga and F. Crispo, The 3-D inviscid limit result under slip boundary conditions. A negative answer, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 14 (2012), pp. 55-59.
5. Y. Brenier, Homogeneous hydrostatic flows with convex velocity profiles, Nonlinearity, 12 (1999), pp. 495-512.
6. Y. Brenier, Remarks on the derivation of the hydrostatic Euler equations, Bull. Sci. Math., 127 (2003), 585-595.
7. R. E. Caflisch and M. Sammartino, Existence and singularities for the Prandtl boundary layer equations, ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 80 (2000), pp. 733-744.
8. M. Cannone, M. C. Lombardo, and M. Sammartino, Existence and uniqueness for the Prandtl equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 332 (2001), pp. 277-282.
9. C. Cao, S. Ibrahim, K. Nakanishi, and E. S. Titi, Finite-Time Blowup for the Inviscid Primitive Equations of Oceanic and Atmospheric Dynamics, preprint, arXiv: 1210.7337, 2012.
10. P. Constantin and J. Wu, Inviscid limit for vortex patches, Nonlinearity, 8 (1995), pp. 735-742.
11. P. Constantin and J. Wu, The inviscid limit for non-smooth vorticity, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 45 (1996), pp. 67-81.
12. S. J. Cowley, L. M. Hocking, and O. R. Tutty, The stability of solutions of the classical unsteady boundary-layer equation, Phys. Fluids, 28 (1985), pp. 441-443.
13. E. Weinan, Boundary layer theory and the zero-viscosity limit of the Navier-Stokes equation, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 16 (2000), pp. 207-218.
14. E. Weinan and B. Engquist, Blowup of solutions of the unsteady Prandtl's equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 50 (1997), pp. 1287-1293.
15. F. Gargano, M. Sammartino, and V. Sciacca, Singularity formation for Prandtl's equations, Phys. D, 238 (2009), pp. 1975-1991.
16. D. Gérard-Varet and E. Dormy, On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 23 (2010), pp. 591-609.
17. D. Gérard-Varet and N. Masmoudi, Well-Posedness for the Prandtl System Without Analyticity or Monotonicity, preprint, arXiv: 1305.0221, 2013.
18. D. Gérard-Varet and T. Nguyen, Remarks on the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation, Asymptot. Anal., 77 (2012), pp. 71-88.
19. E. Grenier, On the derivation of homogeneous hydrostatic equations, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 33 (1999), pp. 965-970.
20. E. Grenier, On the nonlinear instability of Euler and Prandtl equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 53 (2000), pp. 1067-1091.
21. E. Grenier, On the stability of boundary layers of incompressible Euler equations, J. Differential Equations, 164 (2000), pp. 180-222.
22. E. Grenier, Y. Guo, and T. Nguyen, Spectral Instability of Characteristic Boundary Layer Flows, preprint, arXiv: 1406.3862, 2014.
23. Y. Guo and T. Nguyen, A note on the Prandtl boundary layers, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 64 (2011), pp. 1416-1438.
24. L. Hong and J. K. Hunter, Singularity formation and instability in the unsteady inviscid and viscous Prandtl equations, Commun. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), pp. 293-316.
25. M. Ignatova, I. Kukavica, and M. Ziane, Local existence of solutions to the free boundary value problem for the primitive equations of the ocean, J. Math. Phys., 53 (2012), 103101.
26. T. Kato, Remarks on zero viscosity limit for nonstationary Navier-Stokes flows with boundary, in Seminar on Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (Berkeley, Calif., 1983), Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 2, Springer, New York, 1984, pp. 85-98.
27. J. P. Kelliher, On Kato's conditions for vanishing viscosity, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 56 (2007), pp. 1711-1721.
28. I. Kukavica, R. Temam, V. Vicol, and M. Ziane, Local existence and uniqueness for the hydrostatic Euler equations on a bounded domain, J. Differential Equations, 250 (2011), pp. 1719-1746.
29. I. Kukavica and V. Vicol, On the analyticity and Gevrey-class regularity up to the boundary for the Euler equations, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), pp. 765-796.
30. I. Kukavica and V. C. Vicol, The domain of analyticity of solutions to the three-dimensional Euler equations in a half space, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 29 (2011), pp. 285-303.
31. I. Kukavica and V. Vicol, On the local existence of analytic solutions to the prandtl boundary layer equations, Commun. Math. Sci., 11 (2013), pp. 269-292.
32. J.-L. Lions, R. Temam, and S. H. Wang, New formulations of the primitive equations of atmosphere and applications, Nonlinearity, 5 (1992), pp. 237-288.
33. J.-L. Lions, R. Temam, and S. H. Wang, On the equations of the large-scale ocean, Nonlinearity, 5 (1992), pp. 1007-1053.
34. P.-L. Lions, Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 1: Incompressible Models, Oxford Lecture Ser. Math. Appl. 3, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
35. M. C. Lombardo, M. Cannone, and M. Sammartino, Well-posedness of the boundary layer equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35 (2003), pp. 987-1004.
36. M. C. Lopes Filho, A. L. Mazzucato, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, Vanishing viscosity limit for incompressible flow inside a rotating circle, Phys. D, 237 (2008), pp. 1324-1333.
37. M. C. Lopes Filho, A. L. Mazzucato, H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, and M. Taylor, Vanishing viscosity limits and boundary layers for circularly symmetric 2D flows, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 39 (2008), pp. 471-513.
38. C. D. Levermore and M. Oliver, Analyticity of solutions for a generalized Euler equation, J. Differential Equations, 133 (1997), pp. 321-339.
39. Y. Maekawa, On the inviscid limit problem of the vorticity equations for viscous incompressible flows in the half plane, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 67 (2014), pp. 1045-1128.
40. N. Masmoudi, The Euler limit of the Navier-Stokes equations, and rotating fluids with boundary, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 142 (1998), pp. 375-394.
41. N. Masmoudi, Examples of singular limits in hydrodynamics, in Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, vol. III, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 195-275.
42. N. Masmoudi, Remarks about the inviscid limit of the navier-stokes system, Comm. Math. Phys., 270 (2007), pp. 777-788.
43. N. Masmoudi and F. Rousset, Uniform regularity for the Navier-Stokes equation with Navier boundary condition, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 203 (2012), pp. 529-575.
44. N. Masmoudi and T. K. Wong, Local-in-time existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Prandtl equations by energy methods, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., arXiv: 1206.3629 [math.AP], 2012.
45. s theory of hydrostatic Euler equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 204 (2012), pp. 231-271.
46. A. Mazzucato and M. Taylor, Vanishing viscosity plane parallel channel flow and related singular perturbation problems, Anal. PDE, 1 (2008), pp. 35-93.
47. O. A. OleѤnik, On the mathematical theory of boundary layer for an unsteady flow of incompressible fluid, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 30 (1967), pp. 951-974.
48. O. A. Oleinik and V. N. Samokhin, Mathematical Models in Boundary Layer Theory, Appl. Math. Math. Comput. 15, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
49. J. Oliger and A. Sundström, Theoretical and practical aspects of some initial boundary value problems in fluid dynamics, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35 (1978), pp. 419-446.
50. M. Oliver and E. S. Titi, On the domain of analyticity of solutions of second order analytic nonlinear differential equations, J. Differential Equations, 174 (2001), pp. 55-74.
51. J. Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.
52. L. Prandtl, Über flüssigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner reibung, Intern. Math. Kongr. 3, Teubner, Heidelberg, 1904, pp. 485-491.
53. M. Renardy, Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 194 (2009), pp. 877-886.
54. M. Renardy, On hydrostatic free surface problems, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 13 (2011), pp. 89-93.
55. A. Rousseau, R. Temam, and J. Tribbia, Boundary conditions for the 2D linearized PEs of the ocean in the absence of viscosity, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 13 (2005), pp. 1257-1276.
56. A. Rousseau, R. Temam, and J. Tribbia, The 3D primitive equations in the absence of viscosity: Boundary conditions and well-posedness in the linearized case, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 89 (2008), pp. 297-319.
57. M. Sammartino and R. E. Caflisch, Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions, of the Navier-Stokes equation on a half-space. I. Existence for Euler and Prandtl equations, Comm. Math. Phys., 192 (1998), pp. 433-461.
58. M. Sammartino and R. E. Caflisch, Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation on a half-space. II. Construction of the Navier-Stokes solution, Comm. Math. Phys., 192 (1998), pp. 463-491.
59. R. Temam and J. Tribbia, Open boundary conditions for the primitive and Boussinesq equations, J. Atmospheric Sci., 60 (2003), pp. 2647-2660.
60. R. Temam and X. Wang, On the behavior of the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations at vanishing viscosity, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4), 25 (1997), pp. 807-828.
61. R. Temam and M. Ziane Some mathematical problems in geophysical fluid dynamics, in Handbook of Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, vol. III, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 535-657.
62. X. Wang, A Kato type theorem on zero viscosity limit of Navier-Stokes flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 50 (2001), pp. 223-241.
63. T. K. Wong, Blowup of solutions of the hydrostatic Euler equations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., arXiv: 1211.0113 [math.AP], 2012.
64. Z. Xin and L. Zhang, On the global existence of solutions to the Prandtl's system, Adv. Math., 181 (2004), pp. 88-133.