Quantitative comparison of mapping methods between Human and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Oellrich, Anika ^a   Gkoutos, Georgios V ^b,c   Hoehndorf, Robert ^b,c   Rebholz Schuhmann, Dietrich ^a  

^a EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919694412     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-S2-S1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rosenthal N, Brown S: The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nature Cell Biology. 2007, 9: 993-999. 10.1038/ncb437.
2. Schofield PN: Phenotype ontologies for mouse and man: bridging the semantic gap. Disease Models Mechanisms. 2010, 3 (5-6): 281-289. 10.1242/dmm.002790.
3. Abbott A: Mouse megascience. Nature. 2010, 465: 526-
4. Collins FS, Finnell RH, Rossant J, Wurst W: A new partner for the international knockout mouse consortium. Cell. 2007, 129 (2): 235-10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.007.
5. Smith CL, Eppig JT: The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information. Genome Biology. 2004, 6: R7-10.1186/gb-2004-6-1-r7.
6. Robinson PN: The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. American journal of human genetics. 2008, 83 (5): 610-615. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.017.
7. Ghazvinian A: Creating mappings for ontologies in biomedicine: simple methods work. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009, 2009: 198-202.
8. Gkoutos GV: Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes. Genome biology. 2005, 6: R8-10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-p8.
9. Mungall C: Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biology. 2010, 11: R2+-
10. Washington NL: Linking Human Diseases to Animal Models Using Ontology-Based Phenotype Annotation. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7 (11): e1000247-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000247.
11. Hoehndorf R, Scho field PN, Gkoutos GV: PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011, 39 (18): e119-10.1093/nar/gkr538. [ http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/18/e119 ]
12. Yao L: Benchmarking Ontologies: Bigger or Better?. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011, 7: e1001055-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001055.
13. OBO foundry: OBO foundry web page. [ http://www.obofoundry.org/ ]
14. HP: HP download page. [ http://compbio.charite.de/svn/hpo/trunk/src/ontology ]
15. Blake JA: The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): premier model organism resource for mammalian genomics and genetics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D842-D848. 10.1093/nar/gkq1008.
16. Amberger J, Bocchini C, Hamosh A: A new face and new challenges for online mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM). Hum Mutat. 2011, 32: 564-567. 10.1002/humu.21466.
17. Jackson laboratory: Download page for Mouse Genome Informatics database report files. [ ftp://ftp.informatics.jax.org/pub/reports/index.html ]
18. Hoehndorf R, Oellrich A, Rebholz-Schuhmann D: Interoperability between phenotype and anatomy ontologies. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26 (24): 3112-8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq578.
19. Hoehndorf R: A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 1001-1008. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr058.
20. Kazakov Y: Consequence-driven reasoning for horn SHIQ ontologies. Proc of IJCAI-09. 2009