Prevalence of visual–functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 300-308

  Nakamura, Masato ^a   Yamagishi, Masakazu ^b   Ueno, Takafumi ^c   Hara, Kazuhiro ^d   Ishiwata, Sugao ^e   Itoh, Tomonori ^f   Hamanaka, Ichiro ^g   Wakatsuki, Tetsuzo ^h   Sugano, Teruyasu ⁱ   Kawai, Kazuya ^j   Akasaka, Takashi ^k   Tanaka, Nobuhiro ^l   Kimura, Takeshi ^m  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY OHASHI MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^b KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c KURUME UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d MITSUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e TORANOMON HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^f IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g Rakuwakai Marutamachi Hospital   (Japan)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

ⁱ YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^j Chikamori Hospital   (Japan)

^k WAKAYAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^l TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^m KYOTO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

Angiographic coronary stenosis; FFR; Functional coronary stenosis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHIC FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE MISMATCH; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PATIENT HISTORY OF THERAPY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REGISTER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; JAPAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84919662539     PISSN: 18684300     EISSN: 18684297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12928-014-0259-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.
2. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.
3. De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.
4. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.
5. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.
6. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.
7. Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–11.
8. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, Kim YT, Yun SC, et al. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36.
9. Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.
10. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.
11. Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.
12. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.
13. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.
14. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–72.
15. Leone AM, De Caterina AR, Basile E, Gardi A, Laezza D, Mazzari MA, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:29–36.
16. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21.
17. Brosh D, Higano ST, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Lerman A. Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Am Heart J. 2005;150:338–43.