Systems Integration in the US Defence Industry

The Business of Systems Integration

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Gholz, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capabilities; Defence industry; Public policy; Systems integration; Weapon systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919617536     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/0199263221.003.0014     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Baldwin, W. L. (1967). The Structure of the Defense Market 1955-1964. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2. Balisle, P. and Bush, T. (2002). 'CEC Provides Theater Air Dominance', US Naval Institute Proceedings, 128/5: 60-2.
3. Baucom, D. (1998). 'The Rise and Fall of the SDI Institute: A Case Study of the Management of the Strategic Defense Initiative', Incomplete Draft, August.
4. Baum, C. (1981). The System Builders: The Story of SDC. Santa Monica: System Development Corporation.
5. Builder, C. H. (1989). The Masks of War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Chuter, A. (2002). 'Honeywell Eyes FCS Systems Integration', Defense News, 29 July-4 August: 4.
7. CotÉ, Jr., O. R. (1995). 'The Politics of Innovative Military Doctrine: The US Navy and Fleet Ballistic Missiles'. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8. Dyer, D. (1998). TRW: Pioneering Technology and Innovation Since 1900. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Friedman, N. (2000). Seapower and Space: From the Dawn of the Missile Age to Net-centric Warfare. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
10. Gholz, E. (1999). 'Wall Street Lacks Realistic View of Defense Business', Defense News, 20 December: 31.
11. Gholz, E. and Sapolsky, H. M. (1999). 'Restructuring the US Defense Industry', International Security, 24/3: 5-51.
12. Harknett, R. J., and The JCISS Study Group (2000). 'The Risks of a Networked Military', Orbis, 4/1: 127-43.
13. Herbert, P. (1988). 'Deciding What Has to be Done: General William E. DePuy and the 1976 Edition of FM 100-5, Operations', Leavenworth Papers, No. 16. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute, US Army Command and General Staff College.
14. Hughes, T. P. (1998). Rescuing Prometheus: Four Monumental Projects that Changed the Modern World. New York: Vintage Books.
15. Jacobs, J. F. (1986). The Sage Air Defense System: A Personal History. Bedford, MA: MITRE.
16. McNaugher, T. L. (1989a). New Weapons, Old Politics: America's Military Procurement Muddle. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. McNaugher, T. L. (1989b). 'Weapons Procurement: The Futility of Reform', in M. Mandelbaum (ed.), America's Defense. New York: Holmes & Meier, 68-112.
18. E. McKinney, E. Gholz, and H. M. Sapolsky (eds.), Acquisition Reform (MIT Lean Aircraft Initiative Policy Working Group Working Paper #1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Michel III, M. L. (1997). Clashes: Air Combat over North Vietnam 1965-1972. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.
20. Mintz, J. (1996). 'Air Force Halts Merger of 2 Companies', Washington Post, 16 November: D1.
21. Office Of Technology Assessment (OTA), US Congress (1995). A History of the Department of Defense Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (OTA-BP-ISS-157). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
22. Pfeffer, J. (1987). 'A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations', in M. S. Mizruchi and M. Schwartz (eds.), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business. New York: Cambridge University Press, 25-55.
23. Rogerson, W. (1998). 'Incentives in Defense Contracting'. Paper presented at the MIT Security Studies Program, October, 1998.
24. Rosen, S. P. (1984). 'Systems Analysis and the Quest for Rational Defense', Public Interest, Summer: 3-17.
25. Rotnam, G. (2002). 'US Navy to Set New CEC Requirements', Defense News, 22-28 July: 44.
26. Sapolsky, H. M. (1972). The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Sapolsky, H. M. (1982). 'Myth and Reality in Project Planning and Control', in F. Davidson and C. L. Meadow (eds.), Macro-engineering and the Future. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 173-82.
28. Sapolsky, H. M. (1990). Science and the Navy: The History of the Office of Naval Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Sapolsky, H. M. and CotÉ Jr., O. R. (1997). 'The Third Battle of the Atlantic', Submarine Review, July: 40-2.
30. Sapolsky, H. M., Gholz, E., and Kaufman, A. (1999). 'Security Lessons from the Cold War', Foreign Affairs, 78/4: 77-89.
31. Smith, B. L. R. (1966). The Future of the Not-for-Profit Corporations (P-3366). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
32. Stanley-Mitchell, E. (2001). 'Technology's Double-edged Sword: The Case of US Army Battlefield Digitization', Defense Analysis, 17/3: 267-88.
33. Svitak, A. (2002). 'Disjointed First Steps: US Services' Transformation Plans Compete, Don't Cooperate', Defense News, 19-25 August: 1.
34. Tumpak, S. (2002). 'Limit Super Primes', Defense News, 15-21 July: 23.
35. US General Accounting Office (1986). Strategic Defense Initiative Program: Expert's Views on DoD's Organizational Options and Plans for SDI Technical Support (GAO/NSIAD-87-43). November. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
36. US General Accounting Office (1996). Federally Funded R&D Centers: Issues Relating to the Management of DoD-Sponsored Centers (GAO/NSIAD-96-112). August. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
37. Wall, R. (2001). 'V-22 Support Fades Amid Accidents, Accusations, Probes', Aviation Week and Space Technology, 29 January: 28.
38. Williams, C. (2001). 'Holding the Line on Infrastructure Spending', in C. Williams (ed.), Holding the Line: US Defense Alternatives for the Early 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 55-77.
39. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.