Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 689-700

  Shi, Chunhu ^a   Zhu, Lin ^a   Wang, Xue ^a   Qin, Chunxia ^a   Xu, Qi ^a   Tian, Jinhui ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Methodological quality; Nursing field; Reporting characteristics; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CHINA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; NURSING CARE;

CHINA; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; HUMANS; NURSING CARE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84919615644     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12255     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48: 167-171.
2. Yuan HB, Qian XL, Zhang MJ. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pelvic floor exercises on stress urinary incontinence. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2004; 39: 171-172.
3. Garg AX, Hackam D, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: When one study is just not enough. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2008; 3: 253-260.
4. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A etal. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1998; 280: 278-280.
5. Mrkobrada M, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Haynes RB etal. Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2008; 3: 1102-1114.
6. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA etal. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2007; 7: 10.
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J etal. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery 2010; 8: 336-341.
8. Xiong Y. Quality appraisal of domestic reports of systematic reviews. Journal of Nursing Science 2010; 25: 80-82.
9. Qiu YQ, He J. Quality appraisal of meta analysis related to domestic nursing journals. Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 2008; 25: 28-31.
10. Su X, Wang WL, Li HP. Analysis of domestic nursing literature systematic review. Journal of Nursing (China) 2008; 15: 14-17.
11. Jin YH, Ma ET, Hua W, Dou HY. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nursing field in China. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2012; 12: 1148-1155.
12. Dai Y, Hu HA. Statistical analysis on paper funds in Chinese journal of nursing in 2005 year. Medical Information 2007; 20: 278-280.
13. Jørgensen AW, Hilden J, Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: Systematic review. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2006; 333: 782.
14. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA etal. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62: 1013-1020.
15. Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ etal. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009; 1: MR000006.
16. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M etal. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007; 2: MR000010.
17. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA etal. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e3081.
18. Ma B, Guo J, Qi G etal. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e20185.
19. Roundtree AK, Kallen MA, Lopez-Olivo MA etal. Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62: 128-137.
20. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1998; 279: 1566-1570.
21. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 289: 454-465.
22. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Abbate A etal. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: Case study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2006; 332: 202-209.
23. Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC etal. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine 2007; 4: e78.
24. Silagy CA, Middleton P, Hopewell S. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: Comparing what was done to what was planned. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002; 287: 2831-2834.
25. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. CMAJ 2007; 176: 1091-1096.
26. Cheng JL. Investigation on cognition state of college nursing students toward nursing scientific research. Chinese Nursing Research 2009; 23: 1023-1025.
27. Lu YZ, Zhen Y. Investigation on nurses'cognition on funded nursing research projects. Journal of Nursing Science 2008; 23: 62-63.
28. Liu K, Guo L, Zhang L. Investigation into nursing staff's cognition status of evidence-based medicine. Journal of Liaoning Medical University 2010; 3: 259-262.
29. Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e35621.
30. Jiao HL, Hu Y, Cao YL etal. A survey of content and form of evidence-based nursing education in Shanghai. Shanghai Nursing 2011; 11: 12-16.
31. Li M, Tan KH, Kuang JH. Investigation on evidence based nursing basic quality of nurses in primary hospital. Nursing Practice and Research 2012; 9: 4-6.