When history moves on: The foundations and diffusion of a second demographic transition

International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 81-118

  Lesthaeghe, Ron ^a   Surkyn, Johan ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919564146     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809648     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Alwin, D. (1989). Changes in qualities valued in children, 1964–1984. Social Science Research, 44(2), 1–42.
2. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Random House.
3. Ariès, P. (1980). Two successive motivations for the declining birth rates in the West. Population and Development Review, 6(4), 645–650.
4. Barber, J. S., Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (2002). The influence of attitudes on family formation processes. in R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions (pp. 45–93). The Hague: Netherland Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
5. Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Calot, G., & Frejka, T. (2001). Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 103–132.
7. Clarkberg, M. (2002). Family formation experiences and changing values: The effects of cohabitation and marriage on the important things in life. in R. Leshtaeghe (Ed.), Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions (pp. 183–250). The Hague: Netherland Interdisciplinary Demography Institute.
8. Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M. & Waite, L. (1995). Attitudes, values and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609–634.
9. Cliquet, R. (1992). The second demographic transition: Fact or fiction? Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Population Studies.
10. Coale, A. J., & Trussell, T. J. (1974). Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Index 40(2), 185–258.
11. Coleman, D. (2003). Why we don’t have to believe without doubting in the Second Demographic Transition: Some agnostic comments. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Association for Population Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
12. Council of Europe. (2004). Recent demographic developments in Europe, 2003 (pp. 66–68). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
13. Dalla Zuanna, G. (2002). The Banquet of Aeolus: A familistic interpretation of Italy’s lowest-low fertility. Demographic Research 4(5), 133–161.
14. Easterlin, R. (1973). Relative economic status and the American fertility swing. in E. Sheldon (Ed.), Family economic behavior (pp. 170–223). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
15. Goldscheider, F., & Waite, L. (1987). Nest-leaving patterns and the transition to marriage for young men and women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 507–516.
16. Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.
17. Inglehart, R. (1970). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Inglehart, R. (1980). Aggregate stability and individual flux: The level of analysis paradox. American Political Science Review, 79, 97–116.
19. International Institute for Population Sciences. (2002). India National Family Health Survey 1998–99 (pp. 87–89). Calverton, MD: ORC-MACRO.
20. Jansen, M., & Kalmijn, M. (2000). Emancipatiewaarden en de levensloop van jong-volwassen vrouwen: Een panelanalyse van wederzijdse invloeden. Sociologische Gids, 47, 293–314.
21. Jansen, M., & Kalmijn, M. (2002). Investment in family life: The impact of value orientations on patterns of consumption, production and reproduction in married and cohabiting couples. in R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions (pp. 129–159). The Hague: Netherland Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
22. Jones, G.W. (2006). Delayed marriage in Pacific Asia, gender relations and the fertility crisis. National University of Singapore, Asia Research Institute Working Papers 61.
23. Kantorova, V. (2004). Education and entry into motherhood: The Czech Republic during state socialism and the transition period, 1970–1997. Demographic Review, S3(10).
24. Kohler, H-P., Billari, F., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680.
25. Kohn, M. L. (1977). Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Lesthaeghe, R. (2001, March). Postponement and recuperation: Recent fertility trends and forecasts in six Western European countries. Paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Below Replacement Fertility, Tokyo.
27. Lesthaeghe, R. (2002). Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions. (NIDI-CBGS Monograph 37). The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
28. Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn J. R. (2002). New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? Economic Survey of Europe, 1(6), 197–216. Geneva: United Nations Commission for Europe.
29. Lesthaeghe, R., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? in R. Lesthaeghe & van de Kaa, D. J. (Eds.), Bevolking: Groei en krimp, mens en maatschappij book supplement (pp. 9–24). Deventer: Van Loghum-Slaterus.
30. Lesthaeghe, R., & Willems, P. (1999). Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the EU? Population and Development Review, 25(1), 211–228.
31. Livi-Bacci, M. (1971). A century of Portuguese fertility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
33. Micheli, G. (1996). New patterns of family formation in Italy. Which tools for which interpretation? Genus, 52(1–2), 15–52.
34. Micheli, G. (2000). Kinship, family and social network: The anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe. Demographic Research, 3(13).
35. Moors, G. (2002). Reciprocal relations between gender role values and family formation. in R. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions (pp. 217–250). The Hague: Netherland Interdisciplinary Demography Institute.
36. Palomba, R. (1995). Italy: The invisible change. in R. Palomba & H. Moors (Eds.), Population, family and welfare (pp. 158–176). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
38. Rabusic, L. (2001). Value change and demographic behaviour in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review 9(1), 99–122.
39. Raymo, J., & Iwasawa, M. (2006, March). Unmarried cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles.
40. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2), 203–234.
41. Rychtarikova, J. (2000). Demographic transition or demographic shock in recent population development in the Czech Republic? Acta Universitas Carolinae Geographica, 1, 89–102.
42. Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., & Kantorova, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population, 19(1), 1–29.
43. Stloukal, L. (1998). Declining nuptiality in the Czech Republic, 1989–1996. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Society for Population Studies, Cambridge, UK.
44. Surkyn, J. (2003, August). Changing attitudes and values across Europe: Social cohesion and the family. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Association for Population Studies(EAPS), session Q1, Warsaw.
45. Thornton, A. (1985). Reciprocal influences of family and religion in a changing world. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 381–394.
46. Thornton, A., Axinn, W., & Hill, D. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628–651.
47. Thornton, A., Binstock, G., & Ghimire, D. (2004, June). International networks, ideas and family change. Paper presented at the Conference on Ideational Factors in International Family Change, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
48. United Nations. (2002). Demographic yearbook 2000, (ST/ESA/STAT/SER.R/31, pp. 125–142). New York: UN Publishing Division.
49. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.
50. van de Kaa, D. J. (1994). The second demographic transition revisited: Theories and expectations. in G. Beets et al. (Eds.), Population and family in the low countries 1993 (pp. 91–126). NIDI-CBGS Monograph 30. Lisse, the Netherlands: Zwets & Zeitlinger.
51. van de Kaa, D. J. (2004). The true communality: in reflexive societies fertility is a derivative. Population Studies 58(1), 77–92.
52. van Rysselt, R. (1989, June). Developments in attitudes and values orientations: A comparison between birth cohorts in the Netherlands over the period 1970–1985. Symposium on Life Histories and Generations at the meeting of the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies, Wassenaar.
53. Zakharov, S., & Ivanova, E. (1996). Fertility decline and recent changes in Russia: On the threshold of the second demographic transition. in J. Davanzo (Ed.), Russia’s Demographic Crisis (pp. 36–82). Santa Monica CA: Rand Corporation.
54. Zakharov, S. (1997, November). Fertility trends in Russia and the European new independent states: Crisis or turning point? Expert Group Meeting on Below-Replacement Fertility, (ESA/P/WP.140). New York: United Nations Population Division.
55. Zeman, K., Sobotka, T., & Kantarova, V. (2001, June). Halfway between socialist greenhouse and postmodern plurality: Life course transitions of young Czech women. Paper presented at the Euresco Conference on the Second Demographic Transition, Bad Herrenalb, session 2B.