The impact of environmental and climate constraints on global food supply

Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 206-234

  Eickhout, Bas ^a   Meijl, Hans Van ^b   Tabeau, Andrzej ^b   Stehfest, Elke ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919540074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203882962     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Alcamo, J., Leemans, R. and Kreileman, G.J.J., 1998. Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model. Pergamon & Elseviers Science, London.
2. Bakkenes, M., Eickhout, B. and Alkemade, J.R.M., 2006. Ecosystem impacts for biodiversity of different stabilization scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 16: 19-28.
3. Bouwman, A.F. and Leemans, R., 1995. The role of forest soils in the global carbon cycle. In: McFee, W.W., Kelly, J.M. (Eds.), Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), Madison, pp. 503-525.
4. Bouwman, A. F., Van der Hoek, K.W., Eickhout, B. and Soenario, I., 2005. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agricultural Systems, 84(2): 121-153.
5. Bruinsma, 2003. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. An FAO perspective. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
6. Brundtland, G., 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 318 pp.
7. Cixous, A.-C., 2006. Le prix de la terre dans les pays européens. Mémoire de Master 2 Recherche en Economie Internationale (2005/2006), Université Paris, France.
8. De Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M. and Sadoulet, E., 1991. Peasant household behavior with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Economic Journal, 101: 1400-1417.
9. Eickhout, B., den Elzen, M.G.J. and Kreileman, G.J.J., 2004. Atmosphere-Ocean System of IMAGE 2.2. A global model approach for climate and sea level projections. (RIVM Report 481508017). Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
10. Eickhout, B., Bouwman, A.F. and Van Zeijts, H., 2006. The role of nitrogen in world food production and environmental sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 116: 4-14.
11. Eickhout, B., Van Meijl, H., Tabeau, A. and Van Rheenen, R., 2007. Economic and ecological consequences of four European land use scenarios. Land Use Policy, 24: 562-575.
12. FAO, 1981. Report on the Agro-Ecological Zones Project. Volume 3. Methodology and Results for South and Central America. World Soil Resources Report 48/3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
13. FAO, 2006a. Livestock's long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Italy. See: http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html.
14. FAO, 2006b. FAOSTAT database collections. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.apps.fao.org
15. Fischer, G., Shah, M. and Van Velthuizen, H., 2002. Climate Change and Agricultural Vulnerability. International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna, Austria.
16. GEO3, 2002. Global Environment Outlook 3. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya.
17. Hertel, T., 1997, Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
18. Hertel, T. and Keeney, R., 2003. Assessing the Impact of WTO Reforms on World Agricultural Markets: A New Approach.
19. Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., Eickhout, B., De Vries, B. and Turkenburg, W., 2005. Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29: 225-257.
20. Huang, H., Van Tongeren, F., Dewbre, F. and Van Meijl, H., 2004. A new representation of agricultural production technology in GTAP. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, June, Washington, USA.
21. IEA, 2004. World energy outlook 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
22. IMAGE Team, 2001. The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios. A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. RIVM CD-ROM publication 481508018, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
23. IPCC, 2007. Impacts, vulnerability and adaptation. Summary for Policy Makers, Working Group II. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report. See http://www.ipcc.ch.
24. Leemans, R. and Van den Born, G.J., 1994. Determining the potential distribution of vegetation, crops and agricultural productivity. In: Alcamo J., editor. IMAGE 2.0-integrated modeling of global climate change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Leemans, R. and Eickhout, B., 2004. Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 14, 219-228.
26. Leemans, R., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B., Bouwman, L. and Schaeffer, M., 2002. The consequences of uncertainties in land use, climate and vegetation responses on the terrestrial carbon. Science in China, 45: 126-141.
27. MA, 2005. Biodiversity Synthesis Report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Report. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.
28. MNP, 2006. Integrated modelling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. Bouwman, A.F., Kram, T. and Klein Goldewijk, K. (Eds.). Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
29. Morita, T. and Robinson, J., 2001. Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications. In: Climate change 2001: mitigation. Report of Working Group III of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 115-166.
30. OECD, 2003. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries 2000. Monitoring and Evaluation. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
31. OECD, 2007. OECD Second Environmental Outlook. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. In press.
32. Parry, M., Arnell, N., McMichael, T., Nicholls, R., Martens, P., Kovats, S., Livermore, M., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A. and Fischer, G., 2001. Millions at risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets. Global Environment Change, 11(3): 1-3.
33. Ricardo, D., 1817. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Timeless series, Empiricus Books, London, UK. ISBN 1902835158.
34. Rose, S., Ahammad, H., Eickhout, B., Fisher, B., Kurosawa, A., Rao, S., Riahi, K. and van Vuuren, D., 2008. Land in climate stabilization modeling: Initial observations. Energy Modeling Forum Report#21, Stanford University, www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/.
35. Rosenzweig, C., Parry, M. and Fischer, G., 1995. World food supply. In: As Climate Changes: International Impacts and Implications, Strzepek, K.M. and Smith, J.B., (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, UK, pp. 27-56.
36. Rotmans, J., De Boois, H. and Swart, R.J., 1990. An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect: the Dutch approach. Climatic Change, 16: 331-356.
37. Rounsevell, M.D.A., Reginster, I., Araujo, M.B., Carter, T.R., Ewert, F., House, J.I., Kankaanpaä, S., Leemans, R. and Metzger, M.J., 2006. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114: 57-68.
38. Strengers, B.J., 2001. The Agricultural Economy Model in IMAGE 2.2. RIVM Report no. 481508015. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. See: http://www.mnp.nl/image.
39. Strengers, B., Leemans, R., Eickhout, B., De Vries, B. and Bouwman, A.F., 2004. The land use projections in the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model. Geojournal, 61: 381-393.
40. Tabeau, A., Eickhout, B. and Van Meijl, H., 2006. Endogenous agricultural land supply: estimation and implementation in the GTAP model. Presented at the Ninth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, June 2006, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
41. Van Meijl, H., Van Rheenen, T., Tabeau, A. and Eickhout, B., 2006. The impact of different policy environments on land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114: 21-38.
42. Van Meijl, H. and Van Tongeren, F.W., 2002. The Agenda 2000 CAP reform, world prices andGATT-WTOexport constraints. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(4): 445-470.
43. Van Vuuren, D., den Elzen, M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B., van Ruijven, B, Wonink, S. and van Houdt, R., 2007. Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of re-duction strategies and costs, Climatic Change, 81: 119-159.