Neurosensory effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation

Brain Stimulation

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 823-831

  Raco, Valerio ^a   Bauer, Robert ^a   Olenik, Mark ^a   Brkic, Diandra ^a   Gharabaghi, Alireza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electrode montage; Frequency; Intensity; Neurosensory side effects; Parameter setting; Study design; Transcranial alternating current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIZZINESS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESSURE; RESPONSE TIME; SENSATION; SKIN SENSATION; TRANSCRANIAL ALTERNATING CURRENT STIMULATION; VISION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BRAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SKIN; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; DIZZINESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOSPHENES; PRESSURE; SENSATION; SKIN; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919484747     PISSN: 1935861X     EISSN: 18764754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. N.E. O'Connell, J. Cossar, and L. Marston Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current Stimulation: Participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2 mA PLoS One 7 2012 e47514
2. P.C. Gandiga, F.C. Hummel, and L.G. Cohen Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation Clin Neurophysiol 117 2006 845 850
3. G.G. Ambrus, H. Al-Moyed, L. Chaieb, L. Sarp, A. Antal, and W. Paulus The fade-in-short stimulation-fade out approach to sham tDCS-reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators Brain Stimul 5 2012 499 504
4. P.S. Boggio, S.P. Rigonatti, and R.B. Ribeiro A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11 2008 249 254
5. U. Palm, E. Reisinger, and D. Keeser Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials Brain Stimul 6 2013 690 695
6. R. Kanai, L. Chaieb, A. Antal, V. Walsh, and W. Paulus Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex Curr Biol 18 2008 1839 1843
7. T. Zaehle, P. Sandmann, J.D. Thorne, L. Jäncke, and C.S. Herrmann Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence BMC Neurosci 12 2011 2
8. R.A. Joundi, N. Jenkinson, J.-S. Brittain, T.Z. Aziz, and P. Brown Driving oscillatory activity in the human cortex enhances motor performance Curr Biol 22 2012 403 407
9. R. Polanía, M.A. Nitsche, C. Korman, G. Batsikadze, and W. Paulus The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance Curr Biol 22 2012 1314 1318
10. R.F. Helfrich, T.R. Schneider, S. Rach, S.A. Trautmann-Lengsfeld, A.K. Engel, and C.S. Herrmann Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation Curr Biol 24 3 2014 333 339
11. J.-S. Brittain, P. Probert-Smith, T.Z. Aziz, and P. Brown Tremor Suppression by Rhythmic transcranial current stimulation Curr Biol 23 5 2014 436 440
12. T. Neuling, S. Rach, and C.S. Herrmann Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states Front Hum Neurosci 7 2013 161
13. M. Feurra, P. Pasqualetti, G. Bianco, E. Santarnecchi, A. Rossi, and S. Rossi State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters J Neurosci 33 2013 17483 17489
14. K.M. Kutchko, and F. Fröhlich Emergence of metastable state dynamics in interconnected cortical networks with propagation delays PLoS Comput Biol 9 2013 e1003304
15. A. Walter, A. Ramos Murguialday, and M. Spüler Coupling BCI and cortical stimulation for brain-state-dependent stimulation: methods for spectral estimation in the presence of stimulation after-effects Front Neural Circuits 6 2012 87
16. A. Gharabaghi, D. Kraus, and M.T. Leão Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation Front Hum Neurosci 8 2014 122
17. C. Poreisz, K. Boros, A. Antal, and W. Paulus Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients Brain Res Bull 72 2007 208 214
18. T. Stephan, A. Deutschländer, and A. Nolte Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation with alternating currents at different frequencies NeuroImage 26 2005 721 732
19. C.M. Schwiedrzik Retina or visual cortex? The site of phosphene induction by transcranial alternating current stimulation Front Integr Neurosci 3 2009 6
20. H. Rohracher Über subjektive Lichterscheinungen bei Reizung mit Wechselströmen Z Sinnesphysiol 1935 164 181
21. R.P. Tuckett Itch evoked by electrical stimulation of the skin J Invest Dermatol 79 1982 368 373
22. P. Minhas, A. Datta, and M. Bikson Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity Clin Neurophysiol 122 2011 637 638
23. Z. Turi, G.G. Ambrus, and K. Janacsek Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation Restor Neurol Neurosci 31 2013 275 285
24. A. Fedorov, S. Jobke, and V. Bersnev Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: a clinical observational study Brain Stimul 4 2011 189 201
25. B.A. Sabel, A.B. Fedorov, N. Naue, A. Borrmann, C. Herrmann, and C. Gall Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy Restor Neurol Neurosci 29 2011 493 505
26. I. Laakso, and A. Hirata Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes J Neural Eng 10 2013 046009
27. J.M. Goldberg, C.E. Smith, and C. Fernández Relation between discharge regularity and responses to externally applied galvanic currents in vestibular nerve afferents of the squirrel monkey J Neurophysiol 51 1984 1236 1256
28. S. Gilman Joint position sense and vibration sense: anatomical organisation and assessment J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73 2002 473 477
29. N.J. Davis, E. Gold, A. Pascual-Leone, and R.M. Bracewell Challenges of proper placebo control for non-invasive brain stimulation in clinical and experimental applications Eur J Neurosci 38 7 2013 2973 2977