-
1
-
-
78649863625
-
A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed
-
Crowe M., Sheppard L. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64(1):79-89.
-
(2011)
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
, vol.64
, Issue.1
, pp. 79-89
-
-
Crowe, M.1
Sheppard, L.2
-
2
-
-
0017360990
-
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
-
Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174.
-
(1977)
Biometrics
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 159-174
-
-
Landis, J.R.1
Koch, G.G.2
-
3
-
-
84855909323
-
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review
-
Pace R., Pluye P., Bartlett G., Macaulay A.C., Salsberg J., Jagosh J., et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2012, 49(1):47-53.
-
(2012)
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
, vol.49
, Issue.1
, pp. 47-53
-
-
Pace, R.1
Pluye, P.2
Bartlett, G.3
Macaulay, A.C.4
Salsberg, J.5
Jagosh, J.6
-
4
-
-
62549147490
-
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews
-
Pluye P., Gagnon M.P., Griffiths F., Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009, 46(4):529-546.
-
(2009)
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
, vol.46
, Issue.4
, pp. 529-546
-
-
Pluye, P.1
Gagnon, M.P.2
Griffiths, F.3
Johnson-Lafleur, J.4
-
5
-
-
84897063471
-
Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews
-
Pluye P., Hong Q.N. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2014, 35:29-45.
-
(2014)
Annu. Rev. Public Health
, vol.35
, pp. 29-45
-
-
Pluye, P.1
Hong, Q.N.2
-
6
-
-
84857851070
-
-
Retrieved from (accessed 14.03.14)
-
Pluye P., Robert E., Cargo M., Bartlett G., O'Cathain A., Griffiths F., et al. Proposal: A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews 2011, Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com (accessed 14.03.14).
-
(2011)
Proposal: A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews
-
-
Pluye, P.1
Robert, E.2
Cargo, M.3
Bartlett, G.4
O'Cathain, A.5
Griffiths, F.6
-
7
-
-
84919454309
-
Systematic mixed studies reviews: reliability testing of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool
-
Retrieved from (accessed 20.08.14)
-
Souto R., Khanassov V., Pluye P., Hong Q.N., Bush P., Vedel I. Systematic mixed studies reviews: reliability testing of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Mixed Methods International Research Association (MMIRA) Conference 2014, Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com (accessed 20.08.14).
-
(2014)
Mixed Methods International Research Association (MMIRA) Conference
-
-
Souto, R.1
Khanassov, V.2
Pluye, P.3
Hong, Q.N.4
Bush, P.5
Vedel, I.6
|