Population matters when modeling hurricane fatalities

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 50, 2014, Pages E5331-E5332

  Bakkensen, Laura A ^a   Larson, William ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b Bureau of Economic Analysis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEATH; GENDER BIAS; HUMAN; HURRICANE; LETTER; MASS DISASTER; POPULATION; POPULATION DENSITY; DISASTER; FEMALE; MALE; METEOROLOGY; NOMENCLATURE;

CYCLONIC STORMS; DISASTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METEOROLOGY; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84919446174     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1417030111     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Jung K, Shavitt S, Viswanathan M, Hilbe JM (2014) Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(24):8782-8787.
2. Malter D (2014) Female hurricanes are not deadlier than male hurricanes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(34):E3496.
3. Pielke RA, Jr, et al. (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900-2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29-42.
4. Jung K, Shavitt S, Viswanathan M, Hilbe JM (2014) Reply to Christensen and Christensen and to Malter: Pitfalls of erroneous analyses of hurricanes names. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(34):E3499-E3500.