Optimization of ADV sampling strategies using DNS of turbulent flow

Journal of Hydraulic Research

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 862-869

  Gil Montero, Vicente G ^a   Romagnoli, Martín ^b   García, Carlos M ^c   Cantero, Mariano I ^d   Scacchi, Graciela ^e  

^a CENTRO ATÓMICO BARILOCHE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^d INSTITUTO BALSEIRO   (Argentina)

^e UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL LITORAL   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Acoustic Doppler velocimeter; direct numerical simulation; sampling strategy

Indexed keywords

DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION; DOPPLER EFFECT; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; SHEAR STRESS; TURBULENT FLOW; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

ACOUSTIC DOPPLER VELOCIMETER; ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS; FILTERING EFFECTS; REYNOLDS SHEAR STRESS; SAMPLING STRATEGIES; TEMPORAL AVERAGING; TURBULENCE PARAMETERS; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY;

SHEAR FLOW;

ACOUSTIC METHOD; CHANNEL HYDRAULICS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; RIVER CHANNEL; SAMPLING; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 84919438891     PISSN: 00221686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2014.967818     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bendat, J., &, Piersol, A. (2000). Random data. New York, USA: Wiley.
2. Blanckaert, K., &, Lemmin, U. (2006). Means of noise reduction in acoustic turbulence measurements. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 44 (1), 3-17. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521657
3. Cantero, M., Lee, J., Balachandar, J., &, García. M. (2007). On the front velocity of gravity currents. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 586, 1-39. doi: 10.1017/S0022112007005769
4. Cortese, T., &, Balachandar, S. (1995). High performance spectral simulation of turbulent flows inmassively parallel machines with distributed memory. International Journal of Supercomputing Applications, 9 (3), 187-204. doi: 10.1177/109434209500900302
5. Doroudian, B., Bagherimiyab, F., &, Lemmin, U. (2010). Improving the accuracy of four-receiver acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows. Limnology and Oceanography Methods, 8, 575-591. doi: 10.4319/lom.2010.8.0575
6. García, C., Cantero, M., Niño, Y., &, García, M. (2005). Turbulence measurements with acoustic Doppler velocimeters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131, 1062-1073. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:12(1062)
7. Goring, D., &, Nikora, V. (2002). Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121 (1), 117-126. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:1(117)
8. Kraus, N., Lohrmann, L., &, Cabrera, R. (1994). New acoustic meter for measuring 3d laboratory flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 120, 406-412. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:3(406)
9. Lhermitte, R., &, Serafin, R. (1984). Pulse to pulse Doppler sonar signal processing techniques. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Tech nology, 1, 293-308. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1984)001<0293:PTPCDS>2.0.CO;2
10. Lohrmann, A., Cabrera, R., &, Kraus, N. (1994). Acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for laboratory use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fundamentals and Advancements in Hydraulic Measurements and Experimentation, ASCE, 351-365.
11. López, F., &, Garcia, M. (2001). Mean flow structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127, 392-402. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:5(392)
12. McLelland, S., &, Nicholas, A. (2000). A new method for evaluating errors in high-frequency ADV measurements. Hydrological Processes, 14, 351-366. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000215)14:2<351::AID-HYP963>3.0.CO;2-K
13. Miller, K., &, Rochwarger, M. (1972). A covariance approach to spectral moment estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information. Theory, 18, 588-596. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054886
14. Nezu, I., &, Nakagawa, H. (1993). Turbulence in open-channel flows. IAHR Monograph Series. Rotterdam, NL: Balkema.
15. Nikora, V., &, Goring, D. (1998). ADV measurements of turbulence: Can we improve their interpretation? Journal Hydraulic Engineering, 124, 630-634. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:6(630)
16. Parsheh, M., Sotiropoulos, F., &, Porté-Agel, F. (2010). Estimation of power spectra of acoustic Doppler velocimetry data contaminated with intermittent spikes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136, 368-378. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000202
17. Precht, E., Janssen, F., &, Huettel, M. (2006). Near-bottom performance of the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV)-a comparative study. Aquatic Ecology, 40, 481-492. doi: 10.1007/s10452-004-8059-y
18. Romagnoli, M., García, C., &, Lopardo, R. (2012). Signal postprocessing technique and uncertainty analysis of ADV turbulence measurements on free hydraulic jumps. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138, 353-357. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000507
19. Rusello, P. (2009). A practical primer for pulse coherent instruments. Technical Report TN-27, Nortek, USA.
20. SonTek. (2001). ADV technical documentation. SonTek/YSI, San Diego, USA.
21. Soulsby, R. (1980). Selecting record length and digitization rate for near-bed turbulence measurements. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 10, 208-219. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<0208:SRLADR>2.0.CO;2
22. Tarrab, L., García, C., Cantero, M., &, Oberg, K. (2012). Role of turbulence fluctuations on uncertainties of acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements. Water Resources Research, 48, 1-12. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012529
23. Voulgaris, G., &, Trowbridge, J. (1998). Evaluation of the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for turbulence measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15 (2), 272-288. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0272:EOTADV>2.0.CO;2
24. Zrnic, D. (1977). Spectral moment estimates from correlated pulse pair. IEEE Transactions Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 13, 344-354. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1977.308467