The patient-centered outcomes research institute: Research done differently

Nursing Research

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 72-77

  Newhouse, Robin ^a   Barksdale, Debra J ^b,c   Miller, Julie Ann ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b Nursing Practice Program   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d Outcomes Research Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical research; Comparative effectiveness research; Nursing research; Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute; PCORI

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; UNITED STATES;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84919430237     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: 15389847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000070     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). AACN position statement on nursing research. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/NsgResearch.pdf
2. Center for Advancing Health. (2010). A new definition o f patient engagement: What is engagement and why is it important. Washington, DC: Author.org. http://www.cfah.org/file/CFAH-Engagement-Behavior-Framework-current.pdf
3. Domecq, J. P., Prutsky, G., Elraiyah, T ., Wang, Z., Nabhan, M., Shippee, N.,...Murad, M. H. (2014). Patient engagement in research: A systematic research. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 89. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-89
4. Fleurence, R. L. , Forsythe, L. P., Lauer,M., Rotter, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Beal, A.,...Selby, J. V. (2014). Engaging patients and stakeholders in research proposal review: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Annals of In ternal Medicine, 161, 122-130. doi:10.7326/M13-2412
5. HealthyPeople.gov. (2014). 2020 topics & objectives-Objectives A-Z. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/default.aspx
6. Hibbard, J.H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R.,&Tusler,M. (2004). Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39, 1005-1026. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004. 00269.x
7. Mullins, C. D., Abdulhalim, A. M., & Lavallee, D. C. (2012). Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA, 307, 1587-1588. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.442
8. National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). National Institute of Nursing Research. Retrieved from http://www.ninr.nih.gov
9. National Research Council. (2001). Envisioning the national health care quality report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record-id=10073
10. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (2014). Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). Retrieved from http://pcori.org/researchwe-support/pcor/
11. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (2014a). PCORI patient and family engagement rubric. Retrieved from http://www.pcori .org/assets/201 4/02/PCORI-Patient-And-Family-Engagement-Rubric.pdf
12. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (2014b). The PCORI matchmaking app challenge. Retrieved from http://www.pcori .org/funding-opportunities/challenge/
13. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (2014c Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards Retrieved fromhttp://www.pcori.org/content/eugene-washington-pcori-engagement-Awards
14. Patient Protection and Affordable Care, 42 U.S.C. }180012010).
15. PCORI Methodology Committee. (2013). The PCORI methodology report. Retrieved from http://www.pcori.org/assets/2013/11/PCORIMethodology-Report.pdf
16. Selby, J. V., & Lipstein, S. H. (2014). PCORI at 3 years-Progress, lessons, and plans. New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 592-595. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1313061
17. Sofaer, S., & Schumann, M. J. (2012). Guiding principle for patient engagement. Washington, DC: Nursing Alliance for Quality Care.
18. Timbie, J. W., Fox, D. S., Van Busum, K., & Schneider, E. C. (2012). Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice.Health Affairs, 31, 2168-2175. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0150