Osteosarcoma: Reliability and quality of the information in the internet;Osteosarkom - Vertrauenswürdigkeit und Qualität der Informationen im Internet

Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 164, Issue 17-18, 2014, Pages 353-357

  Schippinger, Michael ^a   Ruckenstuhl, Paul ^a   Friesenbichler, Jörg ^a   Leithner, Andreas ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Health information; Internet; Osteosarcoma; Quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OSTEOSARCOMA; RELIABILITY; AUSTRIA; BONE TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS;

AUSTRIA; BONE NEOPLASMS; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; OSTEOSARCOMA; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84919395280     PISSN: 00435341     EISSN: 1563258X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10354-014-0304-y     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pusz MD. How good is google? Te quality of otolaryngology information on the internet. Otolaryngol. 2012;147:462–5.
2. Fox S. Health topics. Pew internet and American life project February 1, 2011; http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/ HealthTopics.aspx. Zugegrifen: 4. Jan. 2012.
3. Ybarra ML, Suman M. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int J MedInform. 2006;75:29–41.
4. Hitwise. Digital marketing intelligence. 2013; http://www.hitwise.com/us/datacenter/main/dashboard-23984.html. Zugegrifen: 10. Juli 2013.
5. Dearlove OR, Shapes A, Stone C. Internet is useful for information on rare conditions. BMJ. 1997;315:491.
6. Barker S, Charlton NP, Holstege CP. Accurancy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomus snake bites. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010;21:298–302.
7. Huber SK. WAR 2.0 ODER ICTs4PEACE? Konfiktkom-munikation im social web. Dissertation. Kultur- und Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg, 2011.
8. Schajowicz F, Sissons HA, Sobin LH. The World Health Organization’s histologic classifcation of bone tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1995;75:1208–14.
9. Tapscott D. Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. London: McGraw-Hill; 1998.
10. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6.
11. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105–11.
12. Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient EducCouns. 2002;47:273–5.
13. Discern. Qualitätskriterien für Patienteninformationen. 1997; http://www.discern.de/hintergrund.htm. Zugegrif-fen: 10. Juli 2013.
14. Leithner A. Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients’ information? J Am Infrm Assoc. 2010;17:373–4.
15. Clausen KA, Polen HH, Boulos MN, et al. Scope, completeness and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1814–21.
16. Allam A, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Te impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):100.