Kielland's forceps. from controversy to consensus?

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 8-12

  Nash, Zachary ^a,b   Nathan, Bassem ^c   Mascarenhas, Lawrence ^a,b  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Riverside Hospital   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

fetal malposition; Kielland's forceps; operative vaginal delivery; rotational delivery; second stage delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONSENSUS; FEMALE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; KIELLAND FORCEPS; LABOR STAGE 2; LAW SUIT; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OBSTETRIC FORCEPS; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; BIRTH INJURIES; DEVICE SAFETY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIRTH INJURIES; CONSENSUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR PRESENTATION; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84919360177     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12511     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kielland C,. Forhandlinger i Kristiania kirurgiske forening i aaret 1908. [Negotiations in Kristiania surgical association in the year 1908]. In Norwegian. Norsk Mag Lægevidensk. 1908; 69: 34-42, 44-45.
2. Kielland C,. Über die Anlegung der Zange am nicht rotierten Kopf mit Beschreibung eines neuen Anlegungsmethode. [About the application of the forceps on the unrotated head with description of a new application method]. In German. Monatsschr Geburtshilfe Gynäkol. 1916; 43: 48-78.
3. Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama DK,. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG. 2013; 120: 1277-84.
4. Häger RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Øian P, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 428-34.
5. McKelvey A, Ashe R, McKenna D, Roberts R,. Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: a retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 264-7.
6. Morlando M, Sarno L, Napolitano R, Capone A, Tessitore G, Maruotti GM, et al. Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of caesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 92: 457-60.
7. Stock S, Josephs K, Farquharson S, Love C, Cooper S, Kissack C, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 1032-9.
8. Burke N, Field K, Mujahid F, Morrison J,. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 766-70.
9. Dunn P,. Dr Christian Kielland of Oslo (1871-1941) and his straight forceps. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89: F465-7.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. Practice Bulletin 17. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.
11. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC,. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 1007-10.
12. Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ,. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013; 120: 1526-33.
13. Patel RR, Murphy DJ,. Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1302-5.
14. Bahl R, Strachan BK, Murphy DJ,. Operative vaginal delivery. RCOG Green Top guideline no. 26. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011.
15. van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan A H, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Kluivers K,. Levator ani muscle avulsion during childbirth, a risk prediction model. BJOG. 2014; 121: 1155-63.
16. Le Ray C, Théau A, Goffinet F,. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 695.
17. Murphy D, Pope C, Frost J, Liebling RE,. Women's views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study. BMJ. 2003; 327: 1132.
18. Josephs KS, Denison FC, Akolekar R, Cooper ES, Stock SJ,. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010; 95: Fa9.
19. Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B,. Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled rotational forceps delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 170: 341-7.
20. Bates T, Cecil E, Greene I,. The effect of the EWTD on training in general surgery: an analysis of electronic logbook records. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2007; 89: 106-9.