The fuzzy WOD model with application to biogas plant location

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 239, Issue , 2014, Pages 141-150

  Franco, Camilo ^a   Bojesen, Mikkel ^a   Hougaard, Jens Leth ^a   Nielsen, Kurt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biogas plant location; Decision support; Fuzzy data; Interval degrees; Weighted overlap dominance

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOGAS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; SOFT COMPUTING;

BIOGAS PLANTS; DECISION SUPPORTS; FUZZY DATA; INTERVAL DEGREES; WEIGHTED OVERLAP DOMINANCE;

LOCATION;

EID: 84919355905     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01854-6_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 31, 343–349 (1989)
2. Barrenechea, E., Fernández, A., Herrera, F., Bustince, H.: Construction of intervalvalued fuzzy preference relations using ignorance functions: Interval-valued non dominance criterion. In: Melo-Pinto, P., Couto, P., Serôdio, C., Fodor, J., De Baets, B. (eds.) Eurofuse 2011. AISC, vol. 107, pp. 243–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
3. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R., Albadvi, A., Aghdasi, M.: PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 200, 198–215 (2010)
4. Chen, T., Tsao, C.: The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159, 1410–1428 (2008)
5. Farahani, R., SteadieSeifi, M., Asgari, N.: Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey. Applied Mathematical Modelling 34, 1689–1709 (2010)
6. Goguen, J.: The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese 19, 325–373 (1969)
7. Grattan-Guinness, I.: Fuzzy membership mapped onto interval and many-valued quantities. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 22, 149–160 (1976)
8. Higgs, G.: Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems in waste facility location to enhance public transportation. Waste Management & Research 24, 105–117 (2006)
9. Hougaard, J.L., Nielsen, K.: Weighted Overlap Dominance - A procedure for interactive selection on multidimensional interval data. Applied Mathematical Modelling 35, 3958–3969 (2011)
10. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., Dogan, I.: Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 157, 135–153 (2003)
11. Martínez, L., Ruan, D., Herrera, F.: Computing with words in decision support systems: an overview on models and applications. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3, 382–395 (2010)
12. Montero, J., Gómez, D., Bustince, H.: On the relevance of some families of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158, 2429–2442 (2007)
13. Özturk, M., Pirlot, M., Tsoukias, A.: Representing preferences using intervals. Artificial Intelligence 175, 1194–1222 (2011)
14. Özturk, M., Tsoukias, A.: Bipolar preference modeling and aggregation support. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23, 970–984 (2008)
15. Rodríguez, J.T., Franco, C.A., Montero, J.: On the semantics of bipolarity and fuzziness. In: Melo-Pinto, P., Couto, P., Serôdio, C., Fodor, J., De Baets, B. (eds.) Eurofuse 2011. AISC, vol. 107, pp. 193–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
16. Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 31, 49–73 (1991)
17. Sayadi, M., Heydari, M., Shahanaghi, K.: Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling 33, 2257–2262 (2009)
18. Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Probabilistic Metric Spaces. Elseiver Science Publishing Co., New York (1983)
19. Statistikbanken (2013), http://www.statistikbanken.dk
20. Zadeh, L.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences 8, 199–249 (1975)