Clinical outcome of pedestal cup endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a peri-acetabular tumour

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 96B, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1706-1712

  Bus, M P A ^a   Boerhout, E J ^a   Bramer, J A M ^a,b   Dijkstra, P D S ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; CODEINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; BONE TUMOR; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXCISION; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; HEMIPELVECTOMY; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; METASTASIS; MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMOR SOCIETY SCORE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OBTURATOR NERVE; OPEN REDUCTION; ORTHOPEDIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDESTAL CUP ENDOPROSTHESIS; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PERIACETABULAR TUMOR; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TUMOR RECURRENCE; ACETABULUM; BONE NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; PROSTHESIS; SARCOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HEMIPELVECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SARCOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84919343622     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34622     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Grimer RJ, Chandrasekar CR, Carter SR, et al. Hindquarter amputation: is it still needed and what are the outcomes? Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:127-131.
2. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60-A:731-746.
3. Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Falkinstein Y, Allison DC. Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2831-2837.
4. Fisher NE, Patton JT, Grimer RJ, et al. Ice-cream cone reconstruction of the pelvis: a new type of pelvic replacement: early results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:684-688.
5. Jansen JA, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:324-331.
6. Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:579-587.
7. Sys G, Uyttendaele D, Poffyn B, Verdonk R, Verstraete L. Extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction after malignant tumour resection. Int Orthop 2002;26:174-178.
8. Aljassir F, Beadel GP, Turcotte RE, et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:36-41.
9. Fuchs B, O'Connor MI, Kaufman KR, Padgett DJ, Sim FH. Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;397:29-35.
10. Beadel GP, McLaughlin CE, Wunder JS, et al. Outcome in two groups of patients with allograft-prosthetic reconstruction of pelvic tumor defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:30-35.
11. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. High complication rates with pelvic allografts. Experience of 22 sarcoma resections. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:333-338.
12. Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, et al. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma. Intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1663-1674.
13. Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Gebert C, Jürgens H, Winkelmann W. Functional results and quality of life after treatment of pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:575-582.
14. Ozaki T, Hoffmann C, Hillmann A, et al. Implantation of hemipelvic prosthesis after resection of sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;396:197-205.
15. Bruns J, Luessenhop SL, Dahmen G Sr. Internal hemipelvectomy and endoprosthetic pelvic replacement: long-term follow-up results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:27-31.
16. Jaiswal PK, Aston WJ, Grimer RJ, et al. Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1222-1227.
17. Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W, Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;314:203-213.
18. Angelini A, Drago G, Trovarelli G, Calabrò T, Ruggieri P. Infection after surgical resection for pelvic bone tumors: an analysis of 270 patients from one institution. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:349-359.
19. Witte D, Bernd L, Bruns J, et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:1318-1325.
20. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;153:106-120.
21. Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, et al. Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;393:264-271.
22. Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:418-429.
23. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241-246.
24. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1055-1068.
25. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33(4Suppl):AS264-AS279.
26. Winkelmann WW. Rotationplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:503-523.
27. Schoellner C, Schoellner D. [Pedestal cup operation in acetabular defects after hip cup loosening. A progress report]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000;138:215-221. [In German].
28. Perka C, Schneider F, Labs K. Revision acetabular arthroplasty using a pedestal cup in patients with previous congenital dislocation of the hip - four case reports and review of treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:237-240.
29. Dominkus M, Darwish E, Funovics P. Reconstruction of the pelvis after resection of malignant bone tumours in children and adolescents. Recent Results Cancer Res 2009;179:85-111.
30. Kelly SJ, Incavo SJ, Beynnon B. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:64-71.
31. Gradl G, de Witte PB, Evans BT, et al. Surgical site infection in orthopaedic oncology. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2014;96-A:223-230.
32. Gosheger G, Hardes J, Ahrens H, et al. Silver-coated megaendoprostheses in a rabbit model - an analysis of the infection rate and toxicological side effects. Biomaterials 2004;25:5547-5556.
33. Hardes J, Ahrens H, Gebert C, et al. Lack of toxicological side-effects in silver-coated megaprostheses in humans. Biomaterials 2007;28:2869-2875.
34. Guo W, Li D, Tang X, Yang Y, Ji T. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;461:180-188.