Comparison of texture features derived from static and respiratory-gated PET images in non-small cell lung cancer

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Yip, Stephen ^a   McCall, Keisha ^b   Aristophanous, Michalis ^c   Chen, Aileen B ^a   Aerts, Hugo J W L ^a   Berbeco, Ross ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BREATHING; BUSYNESS; CANCER COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOGENESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COARSENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LONG RUN LOW GRAY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; PET SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RESPIRATORY GATED POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; STATIC POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TEXTURE; TUMOR MOTION; TUMOR VOLUME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LUNG TUMOR; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATORY GATED IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RESPIRATORY-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84919326536     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115510     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, De Leyn PR, Verbeken EK, et al. (1999) Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17: 3201-3206.
2. Phelps ME (2000) Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 9226-9233.
3. Lin P, Koh E-S, Lin M, Vinod SK, Ho-Shon I, et al. (2011) Diagnostic and staging impact of radiotherapy planning FDG-PET-CT in non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology 101: 284-290.
4. Weber WA, Petersen V, Schmidt B, Tyndale-Hines L, Link T, et al. (2003) Positron Emission Tomography in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Prediction of Response to Chemotherapy by Quantitative Assessment of Glucose Use. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21: 2651-2657.
5. de Geus-Oei L-F, Vriens D, van Laarhoven HWM, van der Graaf WTA, Oyen WJG (2009) Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 50: 43S-54S.
6. MacManus M, Nestle U, Rosenzweig KE, Carrio I, Messa C, et al. (2009) Use of PET and PET/CT for Radiation Therapy Planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007. Radiotherapy and Oncology 91: 85-94.
7. Erasmus JJ, Rohren E, Swisher SG (2009) Prognosis and Reevaluation of Lung Cancer by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 6: 171-179.
8. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 50: 122S-150S.
9. Pandit N, Gonen M, Krug L, Larson S (2003) Prognostic value of [18F]FDG-PET imaging in small cell lung cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 30: 78-84.
10. Usmanij EA, Geus-Oei L-Fd, Troost EGC, Peters-Bax L, van der Heijden EHFM, et al. (2013) 18F-FDG PET Early Response Evaluation of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 54: 1528-1534.
11. Zhang H-q, Yu J-m, Meng X, Yue J-b, Feng R, et al. (2011) Prognostic value of serial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. European Journal of Radiology 77: 92-96.
12. Higgins KA, Hoang JK, Roach MC, Chino J, Yoo DS, et al. (2012) Analysis of Pretreatment FDG-PET SUV Parameters in Head-and-Neck Cancer: Tumor SUVmean Has Superior Prognostic Value. International Journal of Radiation Oncology∗Biology∗Physics 82: 548-553.
13. Rizk N, Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, Bains MS, et al. (2006) Preoperative 18[F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Standardized Uptake Values Predict Survival After Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Resection. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 81: 1076-1081.
14. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, et al. (2012) Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing. New England Journal of Medicine 366: 883-892.
15. Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, Roy A, Marsden P, et al. (2013) Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40: 133-140.
16. van Velden F, Cheebsumon P, Yaqub M, Smit E, Hoekstra O, et al. (2011) Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38: 1636-1647.
17. Cheng N-M, Fang Y-H, Yen T-C (2013) The promise and limits of PET texture analysis. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 27: 867-869.
18. Amadasun M, King R (1989) Textural features corresponding to textural properties. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 19: 1264-1274.
19. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F (2004) Texture analysis of medical images. Clinical Radiology 59: 1061-1069.
20. Yu H, Caldwell C, Mah K, Poon I, Balogh J, et al. (2009) Automated Radiation Targeting in Head-and-Neck Cancer Using Region-Based Texture Analysis of PET and CT Images. International Journal of Radiation Oncology∗Biology∗Physics 75: 618-625.
21. Huan Y, Caldwell C, Mah K, Mozeg D (2009) Coregistered FDG PET/CT-Based Textural Characterization of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Treatment Planning. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 28: 374-383.
22. El Naqa I, Grigsby PW, Apte A, Kidd E, Donnelly E, et al. (2009) Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. Pattern Recognition 42: 1162-1171.
23. Tixier F, Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Le Pogam A, Corcos L, et al. (2012) Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 53: 693-700.
24. Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, et al. (2011) Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 52: 369-378.
25. Yang F, Thomas M, Dehdashti F, Grigsby P (2013) Temporal analysis of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity characterized by textural features in cervical cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40: 716-727.
26. Eary JF, O'Sullivan F, O'Sullivan J, Conrad EU (2008) Spatial Heterogeneity in Sarcoma 18F-FDG Uptake as a Predictor of Patient Outcome. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 49: 1973-1979.
27. Cook GJR, Yip C, Siddique M, Goh V, Chicklore S, et al. (2013) Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? Journal of Nuclear Medicine 54: 19-26.
28. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, et al. (2002) Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 43: 876-881.
29. Aristophanous M, Yong Y, Yap JT, Killoran JH, Allen AM, et al. (2012) Evaluating FDG uptake changes between pre and post therapy respiratory gated PET scans. Radiotherapy and Oncology 102: 377-382.
30. Huang T-C, Wang Y-C (2013) Deformation Effect on SUVmax Changes in Thoracic Tumors Using 4-D PET/CT Scan. PLoS ONE 8: e58886.
31. Lupi A, Zaroccolo M, Salgarello M, Malfatti V, Zanco P (2009) The effect of 18F-FDG-PET/CT respiratory gating on detected metabolic activity in lung lesions. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 23: 191-196.
32. Werner MK, Parker JA, Kolodny GM, English JR, Palmer MR (2009) Respiratory Gating Enhances Imaging of Pulmonary Nodules and Measurement of Tracer Uptake in FDG PET/CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 193: 1640-1645.
33. García Vicente AM, Soriano Castrejón AM, Talavera Rubio MP, León Martín AA, Palomar Muñoz AM, et al. (2010) 18F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 24: 207-214.
34. Didierlaurent D, Ribes S, Batatia H, Jaudet C, Dierickx LO, et al. (2012) The retrospective binning method improves the consistency of phase binning in respiratory-gated PET/CT. Physics in Medicine and Biology 57: 7829.
35. Leijenaar RTH, Carvalho S, Velazquez ER, van Elmpt WJC, Parmar C, et al. (2013) Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncologica 52: 1391-1397.
36. Galavis PE, Hollensen C, Jallow N, Paliwal B, Jeraj R (2010) Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncologica 49: 1012-1016.
37. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH (1973) Textural Features for Image Classification. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on SMC-3: 610-621.
38. Galloway MM (1975) Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 4: 172-179.
39. Li XA, Stepaniak C, Gore E (2006) Technical and dosimetric aspects of respiratory gating using a pressure-sensor motion monitoring system. Medical Physics 33: 145-154.
40. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe J-A, Garcia CA, Vanderlinden B, et al. (2014) Tumor Texture Analysis in 18F-FDG PET: Relationships Between Texture Parameters, Histogram Indices, Standardized Uptake Values, Metabolic Volumes, and Total Lesion Glycolysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 55: 414-422.
41. Cheng N-M, Dean Fang Y-H, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Huang C-G, Tsan D-L, et al. (2013) Textural Features of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Images: Prognostic Significance in Patients with Advanced T-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 54: 1703-1709.
42. Fang Y-HD, Lin C-Y, Shih M-J, Wang H-M, Ho T-Y, et al. (2014) Development and Evaluation of an Open-Source Software Package CGITA; for Quantifying Tumor Heterogeneity with Molecular Images. BioMed Research International 2014: 9.
43. Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE 67: 786-804.
44. García Vicente AM, Castrejón AS, León Martín AA, García BG, Pilkington Woll JP, et al. (2011) Value of 4-Dimensional 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Classification of Pulmonary Lesions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 39: 91-99.
45. Guerra L, Ponti E, Elisei F, Bettinardi V, Landoni C, et al. (2012) Respiratory gated PET/CT in a European multicentre retrospective study: added diagnostic value in detection and characterization of lung lesions. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 39: 1381-1390.
46. Cheng G, Torigian D, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2013) When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40: 779-787.
47. Yen R-F, Chen K-C, Lee J-M, Chang Y-C, Wang J, et al. (2008) 18F-FDG PET for the lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: Is dual time point imaging worth the effort? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 35: 1305-1315.
48. Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A (2002) Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 43: 871-875.
49. Dong X, Xing L, Wu P, Fu Z, Wan H, et al. (2013) Three-dimensional positron emission tomography image texture analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: relationship between tumor 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake heterogeneity, maximum standardized uptake value, and tumor stage. Nuclear Medicine Communications 34: 40-46
50. Pan T, Mawlawi O, Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Luo D, et al. (2005) Attenuation Correction of PET Images with Respiration-Averaged CT Images in PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 46: 1481-1487.
51. Park S-J, Ionascu D, Killoran J, Mamede M, Gerbaudo VH, et al. (2008) Evaluation of the combined effects of target size, respiratory motion and background activity on 3D and 4D PET/CT images. Physics in Medicine and Biology 53: 3661.