(n, N) type maintenance policy for multi-component systems with failure interactions

International Journal of Systems Science

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1051-1064

  Zhang, Zhuoqi ^a,b   Wu, Su ^a   Li, Binfeng ^a   Lee, Seungchul ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

failure interaction; maintenance policy; Markov decision processes; multi component system; opportunistic maintenance

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ITERATIVE METHODS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PLANNING;

FAILURE INTERACTIONS; MAINTENANCE POLICY; MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES; MULTI-COMPONENT SYSTEMS; OPPORTUNISTIC MAINTENANCE;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84918836775     PISSN: 00207721     EISSN: 14645319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2013.807386     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barlow, R.E., and Proschan, F. (1965), Mathematical Theory of Reliability, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Cho, D.I., and Parlar, M. (1991). A Survey ofMaintenance Models for Multi-Unit Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 51(1), 1-23.
3. Dekker, R., Wildeman, R.E., and Schouten, F. (1997). A Review of Multi-Component Maintenance Models With Economic Dependence. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 45(3), 411-435.
4. Federgruen, A., Groenevelt, H., and Tijms, H.C. (1984). Coordinated Replenishments in a Multi-Item Inventory SystemWith Compound Poisson Demands. Management Science, 30(3), 344-357.
5. Golmakani, H.R., and Moakedi, H. (2012). Optimal Non-Periodic Inspection Scheme for a Multi-Component Repairable System Using A Search Algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(4), 1038-1047.
6. Golmakani, H.R., and Moakedi, H. (2012). Periodic Inspection Optimization Model for a Multi-Component Repairable System With Failure Interaction. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61(1-4), 295-302.
7. Houbao, X., and Weiwei, H. (2008). Availability Optimisation of Repairable System With Preventive Maintenance Policy. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(6), 655-664.
8. Hu, Q., and Yue, W. (2003). Optimal Replacement of a System According to a Semi-Markov Decision Process in a Semi-Markov Environment. Optimization Methods and Software, 18(2), 181-196.
9. Kurt, M., and Kharoufeh, J.P. (2010). Monotone Optimal Replacement Policies for a Markovian Deteriorating System in a Controllable Environment. Operations Research Letters, 38(4), 273-279.
10. Kurt, M., and Maillart, L.M. (2009). Structured Replacement Policies for a Markov-Modulated Shock Model. Operations Research Letters, 37(4), 280-284.
11. Laggoune, R., Chateauneuf, A., and Aissani, D. (2010). Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for a Multi-Component System With Non-Negligible Replacement Time. International Journal of Systems Science, 41(7), 747-761.
12. Lee, S., Li, L., and Ni, J. (2010). Online Degradation Assessment and Adaptive Fault Detection Using Modified HiddenMarkov Model. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 132(2), 021010.
13. Liu, Y. (2008). Predictive Modeling for Intelligent Maintenance in Complex Semiconductor Manufacturing Processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
14. Murthy, D.N.P., and Nguyen, D.G. (1985). Study of a Multi-Component SystemWith Failure Interaction. European Journal of Operational Research, 21(3), 330-338.
15. Nicolai, R.P., and Dekker, R. (2008). Optimal Maintenance of Multi-Component Systems: A Review. in Complex System Maintenance Handbook, eds. K.A.H Kobbacy, and D.N.P. Murthy, New York: Springer, pp. 263-286. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-84800-011-7-11.
16. Popovic, V.M., Vasic, B.M., Rakicevic, B.B., and Vorotovic, G.S. (2012). Optimisation ofMaintenance Concept Choice Using Risk-Decision Factor-A Case Study. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(10), 1913-1926.
17. Ross, S.M. (1996), Stochastic Processes, New York: Wiley.
18. Sung, C.-K., Sheu, S.-H., Hsu, T.-S., and Chen, Y.-C. (2013). Extended Optimal Replacement Policy for a Two-Unit System With Failure Rate Interaction and External Shocks. International Journal of Systems Science, 44(5), 877-888.
19. Tian, Z.G., and Liao, H.T. (2011). Condition Based Maintenance Optimization for Multi-Component Systems Using Proportional Hazards Model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(5), 581-589.
20. Tijms, H.C. (1994), Stochastic Models: An Algorithm Approach, New York: Wiley.
21. Wang, G.J., and Zhang, Y.L. (2009). A Geometric Process Repair Model for a Two-Component SystemWith Shock Damage Interaction. International Journal of Systems Science, 40(11), 1207-1215.
22. Wijnmalen, D.J.D., and Hontelez, J.A.M. (1997). Coordinated Condition-Based Repair Strategies for Components of a Multi-Component Maintenance SystemWith Discounts. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(1), 52-63.
23. Xu, M., Chen, T., and Yang, X. (2012). Optimal Replacement Policy for Safety-Related Multi-Component Multi-State Systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 87-95.
24. Zhang, Z., Wu, S., Lee, S., and Ni, J. (2013). Modified Iterative Aggregation Procedure for Maintenance Optimisation of Multi-Component Systems With Failure Interaciton. International Journal of Systems Science. DOI:10.1080/00207721.2013.771759. http://www. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207721.2013.771759#