Does prone repositioning before posterior fixation produce greater lordosis in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)?

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 364-369

  Yson, Sharon C ^a   Sembrano, Jonathan N ^a,b   Santos, Edward R G ^a   Luna, Jeffrey T P ^a,b,c   Polly, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Trinity Regional Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraoperative positioning; LLIF; Lordosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT POSITIONING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; BACK; BONE NAIL; BONE SCREW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTURE; PRONE POSITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84918833383     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318268007b     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV, et al. Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:670-674.
2. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:92-97.
3. Musluman AM, Yilmaz A, Cansever T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:488-496.
4. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:567-571.
5. Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(26 Suppl):S281-S286.
6. Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, et al. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(26 Suppl):S331-S337.
7. Vamvanij V, Ferrara LA, Hai Y, et al. Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:E13-E18.
8. Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:139-144.
9. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, et al. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:34-37.
10. Papanastassiou ID, Eleraky M, Vrionis FD. Contralateral femoral nerve compression: An unrecognized complication after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18:149-151.
11. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:682-688.
12. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:2024-2029.
13. Tribus CB, Belanger TA, Zdeblick TA. The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:58-61.
14. Benfanti PL, Geissele AE. The effect of intraoperative hip position on maintenance of lumbar lordosis: a radiographic study of anesthetized patients and unanesthetized volunteers on the Wilson frame. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2299-2303.
15. Harimaya K, Lenke LG, Mishiro T, et al. Increasing lumbar lordosis of adult spinal deformity patients via intraoperative prone positioning. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2406-2412.
16. Peterson MD, Nelson LM, McManus AC, et al. The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis. A radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:1419-1424.
17. Lee JH, Yoon KS, Kang SB, et al. Effect of intraoperative position used in posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the maintenance of lumbar lordosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8:263-270.
18. Bess R BK, Vance R, et al. Lumbar biomechanics with extreme lateral interbody fusion XLIF cage construct International Meeting of Advanced Spine Techniques. Paradise Island, Bahamas 2007.
19. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E9.
20. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, et al. Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E7.
21. Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:1530-1535; discussion 1535-1536.
22. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Yong-Hing K, et al. Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured reliably on radiographs? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:859-864.
23. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:211-215.
24. Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N, et al. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15: 92-96.
25. Damasceno LHF CS, Campos AD, Defino HLA Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of Angle Values and of Vertebral Bodies and Intervertebral Discs Role. Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14:193-198.
26. Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, et al. Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord. 1997;10:380-386.