An assessment tool to help producers improve cow comfort on their farms

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 698-708

  Vasseur, E ^a   Gibbons, J ^a   Rushen, J ^a   Pellerin, D ^b   Pajor, E ^c   Lefebvre, D ^d   de Passille A M ^a  

^a SUMMERLAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d Valacta Inc Dairy Production Centre of Expertise Quebec Atlantics   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment tool; Dairy cow comfort; Freestall; Tiestall

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; BOVINE; CANADA; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ALBERTA; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; ONTARIO; QUEBEC;

EID: 84918824014     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8224     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bockstaller C., Girardin P. How to validate environmental indicators. Agric. Syst. 2003, 76:639-653.
2. de Vries M., Engel B., den Uijl I., van Schaik G., Dijkstra T., de Boer I., Bokkers E. Assessment time of the Welfare Quality protocol for dairy cattle. Anim. Welf. 2012, 22:85-93.
3. Code of Practices for the Care and Handling of Dairy Cattle 2009, DFC-NFACC (Dairy Farmers of Canada and the National Farm Animal Care Council), Dairy Farmers of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
4. Gibbons J., Haley D.B., Higginson Cutler J., Nash C., Zaffino Heyerhoff J., Pellerin D., Adam S., Fournier A., de Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Vasseur E. Technical note: Reliability and validity of a method to measure lameness prevalence of cows in tie-stalls. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97:350-353.
5. Gibbons J., Vasseur E., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M. A training programme to ensure high repeatability of injury scoring of dairy cows. Anim. Welf. 2011, 21:379-388.
6. Ingvartsen K.L., Dewhurst R.J., Friggens N.C. On the relationship between lactational performance and health: Is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 83:277-308.
7. Kielland C., Ruud L.E., Zanella A.J., Østerås O. Prevalence and risk factors for skin lesions on legs of dairy cattle housed in freestalls in Norway. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5487-5496.
8. Mench J.A. Farm animal welfare in the U.S.A.: Farming practices, research, education, regulation, and assurance programs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 113:298-312.
9. Nyman A.K., Lindberg A., Sandgren C.H. Can pre-collected register data be used to identify dairy herds with good cattle welfare?. Acta Vet. Scand. 2011, 53(Suppl. 1):S8.
10. Rushen J., Butterworth A., Swanson J.C. Animal behavior and well-being symposium: Farm animal welfare assurance: Science and application. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89:1219-1228.
11. Rushen J., de Passillé A.M. Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:2965-2972.
12. Rushen J., Weary D.M., Smid V., Plaizier K., Girard C., Hall M. Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Dairy Cattle: Review of Scientific Research on Priority Issues 2009, National Farm Animal Care Council, Canada.
13. Sørensen J.T., Rousing T., Møller S.H., Bonde M., Hegelund L. On-farm welfare assessment systems: What are the recording costs?. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16:237-239.
14. Torsein M., Jansson-Mörk M., Lindberg A., Hallén-Sandgren C., Berg C. Associations between calf mortality during days 1 to 90 and herd-level cow and production variables in large Swedish dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97:6613-6621.
15. Vasseur E., Gibbons J., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M. Development and implementation of a training program to ensure high repeatability of body condition scoring of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:4725-4737.
16. Vasseur E., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., Lefebvre D., Pellerin D. An advisory tool to improve management practices affecting calf and heifer welfare on dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:4414-4426.
17. Vasseur E., Rushen J., Haley D.B., de Passillé A.M. Sampling cows to assess lying time for on-farm animal welfare assessment. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:4968-4977.
18. Webster A.J.F., Main D.C.J., Whay H.R. Welfare assessment: Indices from clinical observation. Anim. Welf. 2004, 13:S93-S98.
19. Whay H.R., Main D.C.J., Green L.E., Webster A.J.F. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: Direct observations and investigation of farm record. Vet. Rec. 2003, 153:197-202.
20. Zaffino Heyerhoff J.C., LeBlanc S., DeVries T., Nash C., Gibbons J., Orsel K., Barkema H., Solano L., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., Haley D. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, hock, knee, and neck injuries on dairy cows in free-stall housing in Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97:173-184.
21. Zurbrigg K., Kelton D., Anderson N., Millman S. Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can. Vet. J. 2005, 46:902-909. a.
22. Zurbrigg K., Kelton D., Anderson N., Millman S. Tie-stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 Ontario dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:3201-3210. b.