What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 584, Issue , 2015, Pages 347-350

  Lee, Minji ^a   Kim, Yun Hee ^a,b   Im, Chang Hwan ^c   Kim, Jung Hoon ^c   Park, Chang hyun ^b   Chang, Won Hyuk ^b   Lee, Ahee ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Electric current density; Motor cortical excitability; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL ELECTRODE; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENSITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; DEVICES; ELECTRODE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84918814241     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.052     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ayache S.S., Farhat W.H., Zouari H.G., Hosseini H., Mylius V., Lefaucheur J.P. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2012, 12:949-972.
2. Bai S., Dokos S., Ho K.A., Loo C. A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression. NeuroImage 2014, 87:332-344.
3. Bai S., Loo C., Dokos S. A review of computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 41:21-35.
4. Butler A.J., Shuster M., O'Hara E., Hurley K., Middlebrooks D., Guilkey K. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. J. Hand Ther. 2013, 26:162-170. quiz 171.
5. Dmochowski J.P., Datta A., Bikson M., Su Y., Parra L.C. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:046011.
6. Feng W.W., Bowden M.G., Kautz S. Review of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke recovery. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2013, 20:68-77.
7. Foerster A., Rocha S., Wiesiolek C., Chagas A.P., Machado G., Silva E., Fregni F., Monte-Silva K. Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 37:786-794.
8. Holdefer R.N., Sadleir R., Russell M.J. Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:1388-1397.
9. Horvath J.C., Carter O., Forte J.D. Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be). Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8:2.
10. Kandel M., Beis J.M., Le Chapelain L., Guesdon H., Paysant J. Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2012, 55:657-680.
11. Miranda P.C., Lomarev M., Hallett M. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:1623-1629.
12. Notturno F., Marzetti L., Pizzella V., Uncini A., Zappasodi F. Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013.
13. O'Shea J., Boudrias M.H., Stagg C.J., Bachtiar V., Kischka U., Blicher J.U., Johansen-Berg H. Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. NeuroImage 2013.
14. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
15. Russell M.J., Goodman T., Pierson R., Shepherd S., Wang Q., Groshong B., Wiley D.F. Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density. J. Biomed. Res. 2013, 27:495-508.
16. Sadleir R.J., Vannorsdall T.D., Schretlen D.J., Gordon B. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model. NeuroImage 2010, 51:1310-1318.
17. Wagner T., Fregni F., Fecteau S., Grodzinsky A., Zahn M., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. NeuroImage 2007, 35:1113-1124.
18. Jung Y.-J., Kim J.-H., Im C.-H. COMETS: a MATLAB toolbox for simulating local electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). BioMed. Eng. Lett. 2013, 3:39-46.