The LUCAS 2 chest compression device is not always efficient: An echographic confirmation

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 23-26

  Giraud, Raphaël ^a,b,c   Siegenthaler, Nils ^a,b,c   Schussler, Olivier ^a,b   Kalangos, Afksendiyos ^a,b   Müller, Hajo ^a   Bendjelid, Karim ^a,b,c   Banfi, Carlo ^a,b,c  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c Geneva Hemodynamic Research Group   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOLOGIST; CASE REPORT; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; HEART MUSCLE INJURY; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSOR; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REPERFUSION INJURY; RESUSCITATION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DEVICES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MALE; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84918781924     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: 10976760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. G. Putzer, P. Braun, and A. Zimmermann LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue - a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study Am J Emerg Med 31 2013 384 389
2. S. Gates, J.L. Smith, and G.J. Ong Effectiveness of the LUCAS device for mechanical chest compression after cardiac arrest: systematic review of experimental, observational and animal studies Heart 98 2012 908 913
3. L.M. Cunningham, A. Mattu, and R.E. O'Connor Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: the importance of uninterrupted chest compressions in cardiac arrest resuscitation Am J Emerg Med 30 2012 1630 1638
4. J.M. Field, M.F. Hazinski, and M.R. Sayre Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care Circulation 122 18 suppl 3 2010 S640 S656
5. K. Sunde, L. Wik, and P.A. Steen Quality of mechanical, manual standard and active compression-decompression CPR on the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model Resuscitation 34 1997 235 242
6. T.M. Olasveengen, L. Wik, and P.A. Steen Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation 76 2008 185 190
7. E.B. Lerner, D. Persse, and C.M. Souders Design of the Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care (CIRC) trial: a new state of the art design for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research Resuscitation 82 2011 294 299
8. S. Rubertsson, J. Silfverstolpe, and L. Rehn The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21 2013 5
9. S. Grmec, and P. Klemen Does the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) concentration have prognostic value during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Eur J Emerg Med 8 2001 263 269
10. C.D. Deakin, L.J. Morrison, and P.T. Morley Part 8: advanced life support: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations Resuscitation 81 suppl 1 2010 e93 e174
11. D.C. Pinto, K. Haden-Pinneri, and J.C. Love Manual and automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of associated injury patterns J Forensic Sci 58 2013 904 909