Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: A single center experience

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 20, Issue 46, 2014, Pages 17578-17587

  Bona, Stefano ^a   Molteni, Mattia ^a   Rosati, Riccardo ^a   Elmore, Ugo ^a   Bagnoli, Pietro ^a   Monzani, Roberta ^a   Caravaca, Monica ^a   Montorsi, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Compliance to enhanced recovery after surgery protocol; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast track surgery; Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ELECTROLYTE DISTURBANCE; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PROGRAM; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FISTULA; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PELVIS ABSCESS; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; RECTUM RESECTION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; TOTAL COLON RESECTION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WOUND DEHISCENCE; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON; CONVALESCENCE; ITALY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RECTUM; REHABILITATION; STANDARDS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLON; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; ITALY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTUM; REOPERATION; STANDARD OF CARE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84918558874     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: 22192840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17578     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726 [PMID: 15894098]
2. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM. Short term benefts for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (3): CD003145 [PMID: 16034888]
3. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477-484 [PMID: 15992696]
4. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 210-218 [PMID: 23395398 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0]
5. Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 816-830 [PMID: 24496745 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2469-5]
6. Pucci MJ, Beekley AC. Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013; 26: 39-46 [PMID: 24436647]
7. Fung AK, Aly EH. Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1353-1364 [PMID: 22961513 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8834]
8. Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y. Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e643-e654 [PMID: 22632808 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03105.x]
9. Bona S, Molteni M, Montorsi M. Minilaparoscopic colorectal resections: technical note. Minim Invasive Surg 2012; 2012: 482079 [PMID: 22548166 DOI: 10.1155/2012/482079]
10. Santoro E, Agresta F, Veltri S, Mulieri G, Bedin N, Mulieri M. Minilaparoscopic colorectal resection: a preliminary experience and an outcomes comparison with classical laparoscopic colon procedures. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1248-1254 [PMID: 17943359]
11. Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 227-230 [PMID: 10100792]
12. Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A. A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93: 583-588 [PMID: 22041232 DOI: 10.1308/147870811X605219]
13. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011; 254: 868-875 [PMID: 21597360 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce]
14. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 189-198 [PMID: 18650627 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a]
15. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AG, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, von Meyenfeldt MF. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 224-231 [PMID: 17205493]
16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213 [PMID: 15273542]
17. Serclová Z, Dytrych P, Marvan J, Nová K, Hankeová Z, Ryska O, Slégrová Z, Buresová L, Trávníková L, Antos F. Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456). Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 618-624 [PMID: 19535182 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.009]
18. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 800-809 [PMID: 16775831]
19. Mastracci TM, Cohen Z, Senagore A. Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery. 24. Fast-track programs in colonic surgery. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Can J Surg 2008; 51: 70-72 [PMID: 18248708]
20. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (2): CD007635 [PMID: 21328298 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2]
21. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010; 29: 434-440 [PMID: 20116145 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004]
22. Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao K, Li G, Liu F, Pan H, Li J. Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1379-1388 [PMID: 22585532 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1880-z]
23. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H. Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1540-1545 [PMID: 11091243]
24. Wang Q, Suo J, Jiang J, Wang C, Zhao YQ, Cao X. Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1009-1013 [PMID: 21985126 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02855.x]
25. Kahokehr A, Robertson P, Sammour T, Soop M, Hill AG. Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1308-1313 [PMID: 20958906 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02453.x]
26. Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW, Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation-is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 45-54 [PMID: 16377496]
27. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, Fearon K, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Hausel J, Nygren J, Andersen J, Revhaug A. Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 2005; 330: 1420-1421 [PMID: 15911535]
28. Hasenberg T, Keese M, Längle F, Reibenwein B, Schindler K, Herold A, Beck G, Post S, Jauch KW, Spies C, Schwenk W, Shang E. 'Fast-track' colonic surgery in Austria and Germany-results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 162-167 [PMID: 18462237 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01559.x]
29. Kehlet H, Williamson R, Büchler MW, Beart RW. A survey of perceptions and attitudes among European surgeons towards the clinical impact and management of postoperative ileus. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 245-250 [PMID: 15859962]
30. Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Gerkin TM, Beard TL, Zingaro WM, Tomaszewski KJ, Walton LK, Poston SA. Association of surgical care practices with length of stay and use of clinical protocols after elective bowel resection: results of a national survey. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 299-304; discussion 304 [PMID: 20226899 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.027]
31. Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M, Chandrasekaran TV, MacFie J. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols - compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1045-1051 [PMID: 21985180 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02856.x]
32. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466-477 [PMID: 15896435]
33. Nygren J, Soop M, Thorell A, Hausel J, Ljungqvist O. An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 978-985 [PMID: 19502866 DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f1416]
34. Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M, Kallam R, MacFie J. Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 754-758 [PMID: 20235087 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6961]
35. Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Dejong C, Andersen J, von Meyenfeldt M, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC. A comparison in five European Centres of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 455-461 [PMID: 15896433]
36. Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1239-1243 [PMID: 19571699 DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0b32d]
37. Sjöstedt L, Hellström R, Stomberg MW. Patients' need for information prior to colonic surgery. Gastroenterol Nurs 2011; 34: 390-397 [PMID: 21979401 DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31822c69b4]
38. Lyon A, Payne CJ, Mackay GJ. Enhanced recovery programme in colorectal surgery: does one size fit all? World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 5661-5663 [PMID: 23155304 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5661]