Access to biobanks: Harmonization across biobank initiatives

Biopreservation and Biobanking

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 415-422

  Verlinden, Michiel ^a   Nys, Herman ^b   Ectors, Nadine ^b,c   Huys, Isabelle ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; BIOETHICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESPONSIBILITY; SPECIALIZATION; STANDARDIZATION; STORAGE; TISSUE PRESERVATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS;

EID: 84918532322     PISSN: 19475535     EISSN: 19475543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2014.0034     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cadigan RJ, Easter MM, Dobson AW, et al. "That's a good question": University researchers' views on ownership and retention of human genetic specimens. Genet Med 2011; 13:569-575.
2. Fortin S, Pathmasiri S, Grintuch R, et al. "Access arrangements" for biobanks: A fine line between facilitating and hindering collaboration. Public Health Genomics. 2011; 14:104-114.
3. Edwards T, Cadigan RJ, Evans JP, et al. Biobanks containing clinical specimens: Defining characteristics, policies, and practices. Clin Biochem 2014;47:245-251.
4. Access to collections of data and materials for health research: A report to the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust [Internet]. Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust; 2006. Available from: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Biomedical-ethics/WTX030843.htm. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
5. Knoppers BM, Chisholm RL, Kaye J, et al. A P3G generic access agreement for population genomic studies. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:384-385.
6. Zatloukal K, Vaught J. What are the next steps to overcoming roadblocks to transnational biobank collaboration? Biopreserv Biobank 2012];10:2-3.
7. Morente MM, Cereceda L, Luna-Crespo F, et al. Managing a biobank network. Biopreserv Biobank 2011;9: 187-90.
8. Scott CT, Caulfield T, Borgelt E, et al. Personal medicine-The new banking crisis. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:141-147.
9. Watson PH, Ravid R, Eng CB, et al. What are the main roadblocks to transnational biobank collaboration, and how can we overcome them? Biopreserv Biobank 2011;9:213-216.
10. Lopez-Guerrero JA, Riegman PHJ, Oosterhuis JW, et al. TuBaFrost 4: Access rules and incentives for a European tumour bank. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2924-2929.
11. Lemrow SM, Colditz GA, Vaught JB, et al. Key elements of access policies for biorepositories associated with population science research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1533-1535.
12. Vaught J, Kelly A, Hewitt R. A review of international biobanks and networks: Success factors and key benchmarks. Biopreserv Biobank 2009;7:143-150.
13. Joly Y, Zeps N, Knoppers BM. Genomic databases access agreements: Legal validity and possible sanctions. Hum Genet 2011;130:441-449.
14. P3G Sample and data Access Policy: Core Elements [Internet]. P3G; 2008. Available from: http://www.p3g.org/biobank-toolkit/p3g-sample-and-data-access-core-elements
15. Creation and Governance of Human Genetic Research Databases [Internet]. OECD; 2006. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/creationandgovernanceof humangeneticresearchdatabases.htm. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
16. Colledge F, Elger B, Howard HC. A review of the barriers to sharing in biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 2013;11: 339-346.
17. Campbell LD, Betsou F, Garcia DL, et al. Development of the ISBER best practices for repositories: collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biological materials for research. Biopreserv Biobank 2012;10:232-233.
18. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman J-J, et al. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: A systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:979-990.
19. Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers BM. Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur Respir J 2007;30:373-382.
20. Bauer K, Taub S, Parsi K. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: A brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor Med Bioeth 2004;25:113-142.
21. Master Z, Nelson E, Murdoch B, et al. Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus. Nat Methods 2012;9:885-888.
22. Henderson GE, Edwards TP, Cadigan RJ, et al. Stewardship practice of U.S. biobanks. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:1-6.
23. Crawford G, Foulds N, Fenwick A, et al. Genetic medicine and incidental findings: It is more complicated than deciding whether to disclose or not. Genet Med 2013;15:896-899.
24. Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding [Internet]. OECD; 2007. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/38500813.pdf. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
25. Yassin R, Lockhart N, González del Riego M, et al. Custodianship as an ethical framework for biospecimen-based research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19: 1012-1015.
26. NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources. 2011. Available from: http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices/2011-NCIBestPractices.pdf. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
27. Material and Data Access Agreement-Core Elements and Generic Clauses [Internet]. P3G; 2008 p. 6. Available from: http://www.p3gobservatory.org/repository/ethics.htm. Last accessed June 10, 2014.
28. Wichmann H-E, Kuhn K, Waldenberger M, et al. Comprehensive catalog of European biobanks. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:795-797.
29. Human biobanks for research: Opinion [Internet]. Berlin: Deutscher Ethikrat; 2010. Available from: http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/stellungnahme-humanbiobanken-fuer-die-forschung.pdf. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
30. Zika E, Paci D, Schulte in den Bäumen T, et al. Biobanks in Europe: Prospects for Harmonisation and Networking. 2010 p. 170. Available from: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=3259. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
31. Riegman PHJ, Morente MM, Betsou F, et al. Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol 2008;2:213-222.
32. Asslaber M, Zatloukal K. Biobanks: Transnational, European and global networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2007;6:193-201.
33. Watson RWG, Kay EW, Smith D. Integrating biobanks: Addressing the practical and ethical issues to deliver a valuable tool for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10: 646-651.
34. O'Brien SJ. Stewardship of human biospecimens, DNA, genotype, and clinical data in the GWAS era. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009;10:193-209.
35. Hakimian R, Korn D. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research. JAMA 2004;292:2500-2505.
36. All for one and one for all. Nat Methods 2009;6:111.
37. Quigley M. Property and the body: Applying Honore. J Med Ethics 2007;33:631-634.
38. Björkman B. Different types-different rights. Distinguishing between different perspectives on ownership of biological material. Sci Eng Ethics 2007;13:221-233.
39. Samples and data for research: Template for access policy development [Internet]. National Cancer Research Institute, the National Cancer Intelligence Network and onCorde UK; 2009 p. 45. Available from: http://www.ncri.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Initiatives-Biobanking-2-Access-template.pdf. Last accessed December 2, 2014.
40. Vaught J, Lockhart NC. The evolution of biobanking best practices. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1569-1575.
41. Verlinden M, Ectors N, Nys H, et al. Access rules within biobanks networks. Biopreserv Biobank 2011;9:304.