Effect of sonication time on enhancement of effective thermal conductivity of nano TiO2–water, ethylene glycol, and paraffin oil nanofluids and models comparisons

Journal of Experimental Nanoscience

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 310-322

  Sonawane, Shriram S ^a   Khedkar, Rohit S ^a   Wasewar, Kailas L ^a  

^a VISVESVARAYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

nanofluids; sonication time; thermal conductivity; TiO2nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; NANOFLUIDICS; NANOPARTICLES; OXIDE MINERALS; PARAFFIN OILS; SOLS; SONICATION; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; VISCOSITY;

BRUGGEMAN MODEL; EFFECTIVE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; MODELS COMPARISONS; NANOFLUIDS; SONICATION TIME; SURFACE INTERACTIONS; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT; TIO2NANOPARTICLES;

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF LIQUIDS;

ETHYLENE GLYCOL; LIQUID PARAFFIN; NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; NANOFLUIDICS; PREDICTION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; ULTRASOUND; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84918514444     PISSN: 17458080     EISSN: 17458099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2013.832421     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Maxwell JC. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. 2nd ed. Vol. 1, Oxford: Clarendon; 1881.
2. Choi SUS. Degradation effects of dilute polymer solutions on turbulent friction and heat transfer behavior. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 1992;41(3):289–307.
3. Westphalen D. Heat transfer enhancement. Am. Soc Heat Refrigerating Air Cond Engineers J. 2006;48:68–71.
4. Patel HE. Thermal conductivities of naked and monolayer protected metal nanoparticle based nanofluids: manifestation of anomalous enhancement and chemical effects. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83:2931–2933.
5. Choi SUS, France DM, Knodel BD. Impact of advanced fluids on costs of district cooling systems. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Conference of the International District Heating and Cooling Association; 1992 Jun 13–17; Danvers, MA, p. 343.
6. Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluid with nanoparticles: developments and application of non-Newtonian flows. San Francisco, CA: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition; 1995.
7. Wang XQ. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci. 2007;46(1):1–19.
8. Zerinc SO. Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a state-of-the-art review. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2010;8:145–170.
9. Lee S. Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. Trans ASME. 1999;121:280–289.
10. Lee S. Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. ASME J Heat Transf. 1999;121:280–289.
11. Wang XB. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle–fluid mixture. J Thermophys Heat Transf. 1999;13:474–480.
12. Xuan Y. Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2000;21:58–64.
13. Eastman JA. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;78:718–720.
14. Xie H. Thermal conductivity of suspensions containing nanosized SiC particles. Int J Thermophys. 2002;23:571–580.
15. Wong KFV. Transport properties of alumina nanofluids. Nanotechnology 2008;19:345–702.
16. Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C. Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 2008;47(5):560–568.
17. Li CH. Experimental investigation of temperature and volume fraction variations on the effective thermal conductivity of nanoparticle suspensions (nanofluids). J Appl Phys. 2006;99:084314–084318.
18. Khedkar RS. Influence of CuO nanoparticles in enhancing the thermal conductivity of water and mono-ethylene glycol based nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2012;39:665–669.
19. 2nanoparticles prepared using an aqueous peroxotitanate solution. Ceram Int. 2004;30:1365–1368.
20. 2water based nanofluids. Therm Sci. 2005;44:367–373.
21. 2-water nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2009;33:706–714.
22. Zhu H. A novel one-step chemical method for preparation of copper nanofluids. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;227:100–103.
23. 2nanoparticles by hydrolysis and peptization of titanium isopropoxide solution. Semiconductor Phys, Quant Electron Optoelectron. 2006;9(2):65–68.
24. Yu W, Xie H, Chen W. Experimental investigation on thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing graphene oxide nanosheets. J Appl Phys. 2010;107(9):094317–094317-6.
25. Keblinski P. Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45:855–863.
26. Moghadassi AR, Masoud Hosseini S, Henneke DE. Effect of CuO nanoparticles in enhancing the thermal conductivities of monoethylene glycol and paraffin fluids. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:1900–1904.
27. Hamilton RL, Crosser OK. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundamen. 1962;1(3):187–191.
28. Bruggeman DAG. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen I. dielektrizitatskonstanten und leitfahigkeiten der mischkorper aus isotropen substanzen [Calculation of various physical constants of heterogeneous substances III. The elastic constants of the quasi-isotropic mixing body isotropic substance]. Annalen der Physik 1935;14:636–679.