Toward a theory of agent-based systemic situational awareness

Human Performance Situation Awareness and Automation: Current Research and Trends

Volumn 1-2, Issue , 2004, Pages 83-87

  Walker, Guy ^a   Salmon, Paul ^a   Green, Damian ^a   Stanton, Neville ^b   Baber, Chris ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agents; Driving; Dynamic; Shared SA; Systems; Teams; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917456440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610997     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Adams , M.J. , Tenney , Y.J. and Pew , R.W. , 1995, Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems, Human Factors 37, 85-104
2. Ashleigh , M.J. & Stanton , N.A. 2001, Trust: key elements in human supervisory control domains, Cognition, Work & Technology, 3, 92-100.
3. Baber , C .; Walker , G .; Salmon , P. and Stanton , N. A. (2004) Observation Study Conducted at the Fire Service Training College. Human Factors Integration - Defence Technology Centre Report.
4. Bedny , G. & Meister , D. 1999 Theory Of Activity And Situation Awareness International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 3, 63-72
5. Endlsey M. R. 1995, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Human Factors, 37, 32-64
6. Jentsch , F. , Barnett , J. & Bowers C. A. 1999, Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situation awareness. Human Factors, 41, 1-14
7. Hollnagel , E. 1993, Human Reliability Analysis - Context and Control. London: Academic Press.
8. Kaber D. B. & Endsley M. R. 1997, Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety, Process Safety 16, 126-131
9. Muir , B. M. 1994, Trust in automation: Part 1. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1905-1922.
10. Muir , B. M. & Moray , N. 1996, Trust in automation: Part 2. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39, 429-460.
11. Rasmussen , J. 1986, Information Processing and Human Machine Interaction. New York: North-Holland.
12. Salas , E. , Prince , C. & Baker D. P. 1995, Situation awareness in team performance - implications for measurement and training, Human Factors 37, 123-136
13. Smith , K. & Hancock , P. A. 1995, Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness, Human Factors 37, 137-148
14. Stanton , N. A. & Ashleigh , M. (2000) A field study of team working in a new human supervisory control system. Ergonomics 43, 1190-1209.
15. Singeton , T. 1989, The Mind at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Stanton , N. A .; Ashleigh , M. J .; Roberts , A, D. and Xu , F. 2004, Levels of abstraction in human supervisory control teams. Submitted to Computers, Technology and Work
17. Vicente , K. 1999, Cognitive Work Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Walker , G. H. , Stanton , N.A. , and Young , M.S. 2001, Where is computing driving cars? A technology trajectory of vehicle design. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 13, 203-229.