Is there a normative deficit in the theory of hegemony?

LACLAU: A Critical Reader

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 113-122

  Critchley, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917441615     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203714720     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S. (2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, London and New York: Verso.
2. Critchley, S. (1992) The Ethics of Deconstruction, Oxford: Blackwell; 2nd expanded edn, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
3. Critchley, S. (2000a) ‘Demanding approval: on the ethics of Alain Badiou’, Radical Philosophy, 100 (March): 16-24.
4. Critchley, S. (2000b) ‘Remarks on Derrida and Habermas’, Constellations, 7(4): 455-65.
5. Laclau, E. (2000) ‘Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics’, in J. Butler et al., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, London and New York: Verso.
6. Mouffe, C. (ed.) (1996) Deconstruction and Pragmatism, London and New York: Routledge.
7. Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations, tr. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.