The technology integration assessment instrument: Understanding planned use of technology by classroom teachers

Classroom Integration of Type II Uses of Technology in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 49-62

  Britten, Jody S ^a   Cassady, Jerrel C ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Integration; Lesson plans; Planning; Process oriented; Product oriented; Technology integration assessment instrument

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917432146     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v22n03_05     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Bober, M. J. (2002). Teacher outcomes: Changed pedagogy. In J. Johnston & L. Toms Barker (Eds.), Assessing the impact of technology in teaching and learning (pp. 87-118). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
2. Brooks-Young, S. (2002). Making technology standards work for you–A guide for school administrators. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
3. Burke, J. (2000). New directions: Teacher technology standards. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
4. Cradler, J. (1992). Comprehensive study of educational technology programs in California authorized from 1984-1992. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
5. Cuban, L. (2001) Teachers’ infrequent computer use in classrooms. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum, and professional development (pp. 121-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A., & Pease S. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 285-237.
7. Dockstader, J. (1999). Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and how of technology integration. T.H.E. Journal, 26(6), 73-74.
8. MacArthur, C. (2001). Technology implementation in special education. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum, and professional development (pp. 115-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9. Maddux, C. (1986). Microcomputers in education and counseling: Problems and cautions. Techniques, 2(1), 9-14.
10. Maddux, C., & Cummings, R. (1986). Educational computing at the crossroads: Type I or Type II uses to predominate? Educational Technology, 26(7), 34-38.
11. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
12. NETS Project. (2000). National educational technology standards for students–Connecting curriculum and technology. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
13. NETS Project. (2003). National educational technology standards for teachers–Resources for assessment. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
14. Roblyer, M. (2003). Getting our NETS worth: The role of ISTE’s National Educational Technology Standards. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(8), 6-13.
15. Turnbaugh Lockwood, A. (1999). Standards: From policy to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/teachtech/.
17. Yepes-Baraya, M. (2002). Technology integration. In J. Johnston & L. Toms Barker (Eds.), Assessing the impact of technology in teaching and learning (pp. 139-160). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.