Effecting development: Bureaucratic knowledges, cynicism, and the desire for development in the Indian Himalaya

Differentiating Development: Beyond an Anthropology of Critique

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 193-209

  Mathur, Nayanika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917431870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Baviskar, A. 1997. 'Tribal Politics and Discourses of Environmentalism', Contributions to Indian Sociology 31(2): 195-223.
2. Bhatt, C.P. and S. S. Kunwar. 1982. Hugging the Himalaya: The Chipko Experience, Gopeshwar: Dasholi Gram Swaraj Samiti
3. Edelman, M. and A. Haugerud. 2005. The Anthropology of Development and Globalization: From Classical Political Economy to Contemporary Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
4. Ferguson, J. 1994. The Anti-politics Machine: "Development", Depoliticisation and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Government of India. 2008. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS): 3rd Edition. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development.
6. Guha, R. 2001. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalayas. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7. Gupta, A. 1998. Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
8. Herzfeld, M. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York and London: Routledge.
9. Li, T. M. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
10. Mathur, N. 2010. 'Paper Tiger? The Everyday Life of the State in the Indian Himalaya', Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
11. Mawdsley, E. E. 1996. 'The Uttarakhand Agitation and the Other Backward Classes', Economic and Political Weekly 27: 205-210.
12. Mawdsley, E. E. 1997. 'Nonsecessionist Regionalism in India: The Uttarakhand Separate State Movement', Environment and Planning A 29(12): 2217-2235.
13. Mawdsley, E. E. 1998. 'After Chipko: From Environment to Region in Uttaranchal', Journal of Peasant Studies 25(4): 36-54.
14. Mosse, D. 2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.
15. Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2002. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
16. Pandian, A. 2008. 'Devoted to Development: Moral Progress, Ethical Work, and Divine Favour in South India', Anthropological Theory 8: 159-176.
17. Parry, J. 1999. 'Lords of Labour: Working and Shirking in Bhilai', Contributions to Indian Sociology 33(1-2): 107-140.
18. Pigg, S. L. 1992. 'Inventing Social Categories through Place: Social Representations and Development in Nepal', Comparative Studies in Society and History 34(3): 491-513.
19. Riles, A. 2001. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
20. Riles, A. 2006. 'Introduction: In Response', in A. Riles (ed.), Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 1-40.
21. Shiva, V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
22. Sinha, S. 2003.'Development Counter-narratives: Taking Social Movements Seriously', in K. Sivaramakrishnan and A. Agrawal (eds), Regional Modernities: The Cultural Politics of Development in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 286-312.